aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/INDEX-5
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* "Another Patch in the File (part 2)" by Port FloydKris Kennaway2004-10-141-10559/+11735
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | o/~ We don't need no engineering We dont need no source control No crypto checksums on the distfiles Porters leave them files alone Hey! Porters! Leave them files alone! All in all it's just another patch in the file. All in all you're just another patch in the file. We don't need no engineering We dont need no source control No crypto checksums on the distfiles Porters leave them files alone Hey! Porters! Leave them files alone! All in all it's just another patch in the file. All in all you're just another patch in the file. "Wrong, pointy hat!" "If you don't fix yer ports, you can't have any packages! How can you have any packages if you don't fix yer ports?" "You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds! Stand still, laddy!" o/~ This is the official INDEX for 5.3-RELEASE, with 11735 ports. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=119461
* New INDEX-5 for 5.x, with 10559 portsKris Kennaway2004-03-151-8167/+9003
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=104122
* Yakety, yak, slip that tag...Joe Marcus Clarke2004-02-141-7/+7
| | | | | | | Once more for 5.2.1-RELEASE. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=100899
* Update the 5.2.1 INDEX with the recent XFree86-Server fixes.Joe Marcus Clarke2004-02-111-7/+7
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=100707
* Fixing kuserJoe Marcus Clarke2004-01-271-5/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Don't delete the root account The tag has been slipped This is the 5.2.1-RELEASE INDEX file (now with 9723 ports). Haiku by: kris (lyrics printed with permission of Obsecurity Records) Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=99243
* This is the 5.2-RELEASE INDEX-5 file. As I was looking back on the daysJoe Marcus Clarke2003-12-051-5970/+5972
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | leading up to the src and ports freeze, one thing stood out. My freebsd-current mail folder had was larger than a Slashdot thread on Microsoft acquiring RedHat. Was all of this patches to fix the 5.2-RELEASE TODO items? Nope. But it was part of FreeBSD none-the-less. So, in honor of those countless messages, I proudly present "Bikeshed," a song sung to the tune of Devo's classic, "Whip it." Paint that shed Restart the same old thread Flame that list Now everyone is pissed When 5.2-RELEASE comes along You must bikeshed We need a new commit song Call it "Bikeshed" The developer is wrong You must bikeshed! Dynamically link /sbin You must bikeshed Do the same to /bin You must bikeshed No one gets their way When they bikeshed I say bikeshed! Paint it blue This INDEX-5 file contains 9724 ports (no, it's not prime). Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=95107
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9722 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-11-241-4087/+4296
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=94749
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9513 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-10-191-6995/+7472
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=91620
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9036 ports (37 fewer than last time due toKris Kennaway2003-08-161-1666/+1629
| | | | | | | the recent reaping spree) Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=87018
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9073 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-08-041-5583/+5790
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=86270
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 8866 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-06-221-5592/+5767
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=83427
* Regenerate INDEX for the usual last-minute tag slippage.Kris Kennaway2003-06-011-56/+56
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=81947
* _Bughunter_Kris Kennaway2003-05-311-3878/+3937
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (with apologies to Front 242) Dedicated to Alan L. Cox. o/~ Freeze! Send SIGKILL or die! This page is unclaimed, it's alone and anonymous, But written in the code it's got the marks of a genius. I'm locking down this RAM, to share it with other RAM, To share it with other RAM, on 10 CPUs at least. I'm locking down this RAM, I know the rules of the game. I'm able to rewrite them to realize our aim: I'm locking down this RAM to make us rich and famous! One: you lock the mutex, Two: you cache some files, Three: you download from the net, and Four: you crash VM! You crash VM! o/~ This is the INDEX for 5.1, with 8691 ports. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=81782
* New INDEX for 5.1, with 8632 portsKris Kennaway2003-05-171-5729/+5854
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=81143
* New INDEX for 5.0, with 8507 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-04-181-4423/+4598
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=79249
* New INDEX for 5.0, with 8332 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-03-161-4504/+4624
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=77143
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 8212 portsKris Kennaway2003-02-091-5078/+5407
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=75167
* Last-minute update to include new isc-dhcp3 in RELEASE_5_0_0 index.Kris Kennaway2003-01-161-2/+2
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=73228
* Patch up INDEX for RELEASE_5_0_0 to include last-minute postgresql andKris Kennaway2003-01-121-37/+37
| | | | | | | gdm2 changes. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=72963
* Should auld releases be forgot,Kris Kennaway2003-01-011-3646/+3631
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | And never brought to mind? Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? And ports of auld lang syne, my dear, And ports of auld lang syne. Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? This is the INDEX for 5.0-RELEASE (barring last-minute changes), with 7883 ports. 7883 is a prime number! Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=72004
* Add a separate INDEX file for 5.0 systems. This is necessary becauseKris Kennaway2002-12-051-0/+7898
ports built on 4.x and 5.0 have substantially different dependency lists (mostly due to various system components being moved out of the base system and into the ports tree, such as perl). Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=71387
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-17 21:36:28 +0000