| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/85225
Submitted by: maintainer
Approved by: portmgr (linimon)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=140968
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=28926
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=28727
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=24933
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=17706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to change pkg/PLIST when adding MLINKS support.
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=13226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix pkg_delete while I'm here.
Gee, wouldn't it be nice if bsd.port.mk had support for MLINKs? ;-)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=12587
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=12567
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=11274
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=5067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PLISTs.
Note: I know that this is going to break some symlinks and/or .so
includes, I will back some of these out as I run into these during
package building.
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=4578
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=4535
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=2747
|
|
please check out the PLIST!
The port is still IS_INTERACTIVE and NO_PACKAGE, too many questions
asked by the configure script it doesn't seem to make sense to build
a package. If someone with elm knowledge can check this, that will
be great too.
Suggested by: jkh, ache
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=2057
|