aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/print/hugelatex
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* - update to 1.4.1Dirk Meyer2010-03-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Reviewed by: exp8 run on pointyhat Supported by: miwi Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=251605
* - update to jpeg-8Dirk Meyer2010-02-051-1/+1
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=249285
* - bump all port that indirectly depends on libjpeg and have not yet been ↵Dirk Meyer2009-07-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | bumped or updated Requested by: edwin Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=238701
* - Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/.Florent Thoumie2007-05-191-0/+1
| | | | | | | | - Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}. - Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=191544
* In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase.Edwin Groothuis2005-11-041-5/+5
| | | | | | | [*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=147178
* Reset maintainer at his request. From the email:Mark Linimon2005-09-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical of patches that "fix it". It may be obviated completely by more recent teTeX distributions. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=143161
* This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still brokenKris Kennaway2005-07-231-0/+2
| | | | | | | at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=139936
* BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plistKris Kennaway2005-03-261-0/+2
| | | | | | | Approved by: portmgr (self) Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=131971
* Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me:Mark Linimon2003-10-162-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port should simply be removed. I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one. Could LaTeX users weigh in on this? PR: ports/50094, ports/51837 Submitted by: Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre Approved by: murray (maintainer) Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=91454
* BROKEN: Bad pkg-plistKris Kennaway2003-05-061-0/+2
| | | | Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=80229
* Clear moonlight beckons.Ade Lovett2003-03-072-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment, And be calm ports tree. E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=77045
* Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command;Akinori MUSHA2002-01-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to the echo command. Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=53958
* Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latexMurray Stokely2001-09-085-0/+61
with higher default limits. Obtained from: NetBSD Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=47516
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-17 01:36:35 +0000