src-test/sys/alpha/Makefile, branch main FreeBSD source tree https://cgit-dev.freebsd.org/src-test/atom?h=main 2006-05-11T22:25:28Z First pass at removing Alpha kernel support. 2006-05-11T22:25:28Z John Baldwin jhb@FreeBSD.org 2006-05-11T22:25:28Z urn:sha1:67ab9fd759b279032e61486b28c4ad9b76885671 - change the example of compiling only specific modules to not contain 2006-05-07T18:12:18Z Alexander Leidinger netchild@FreeBSD.org 2006-05-07T18:12:18Z urn:sha1:f4eb4717097d01015245162be8f513be6e10ba30 the linux module, since it is not cross-platform - move linprocfs from "files" and "options" to architecture specific files, since it only makes sense to build this for those architectures, where we also have a linuxolator - disable the build of the linuxolator on our tier-2 architecture "Alpha": * we don't have a linux_base port which supports Alpha and at the same time is not outdated/obsoleted upstream/in a good condition/ currently working * the upcomming new default linux base port is based upon Fedora Core 3 (security support via http://www.fedoralegacy.org), which isn't available for Alpha (like the current default linux base port which is based upon Red Hat 8) * nobody answered my request for testing it ~1 month ago on current@ and alpha@ (it doesn't surprises me, see above) * a SoC student wouldn't have to waste time on something which nobody is willing to test This does not remove the alpha specific MD files of the linuxolator yet. Discussed on: arch (mostly silence) Spiritual support by: scottl Add a dopey makefile to do the tags dance, which is probably not perfect 2000-12-31T23:26:34Z Matt Jacob mjacob@FreeBSD.org 2000-12-31T23:26:34Z urn:sha1:32f73b1c3e662790ded6b171921f8256cb8a754f but is better than nothing by a good deal.