1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp
index 2818c9d9fd4ae..f4d2e32cef111 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckObjCDealloc.cpp
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ public:
                                      const CallEvent *Call,
                                      PointerEscapeKind Kind) const;
   void checkPreStmt(const ReturnStmt *RS, CheckerContext &C) const;
-  void checkEndFunction(CheckerContext &Ctx) const;
+  void checkEndFunction(const ReturnStmt *RS, CheckerContext &Ctx) const;
 
 private:
   void diagnoseMissingReleases(CheckerContext &C) const;
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ void ObjCDeallocChecker::checkPostObjCMessage(
 /// Check for missing releases even when -dealloc does not call
 /// '[super dealloc]'.
 void ObjCDeallocChecker::checkEndFunction(
-    CheckerContext &C) const {
+    const ReturnStmt *RS, CheckerContext &C) const {
   diagnoseMissingReleases(C);
 }
 
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ void ObjCDeallocChecker::diagnoseMissingReleases(CheckerContext &C) const {
       continue;
 
     // Prevents diagnosing multiple times for the same instance variable
-    // at, for example, both a return and at the end of of the function.
+    // at, for example, both a return and at the end of the function.
     NewUnreleased = F.remove(NewUnreleased, IvarSymbol);
 
     if (State->getStateManager()
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ ObjCDeallocChecker::findPropertyOnDeallocatingInstance(
 bool ObjCDeallocChecker::diagnoseExtraRelease(SymbolRef ReleasedValue,
                                               const ObjCMethodCall &M,
                                               CheckerContext &C) const {
-  // Try to get the region from which the the released value was loaded.
+  // Try to get the region from which the released value was loaded.
   // Note that, unlike diagnosing for missing releases, here we don't track
   // values that must not be released in the state. This is because even if
   // these values escape, it is still an error under the rules of MRR to