diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp index 80b1cc192a88a..11808f8995fef 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp @@ -741,6 +741,11 @@ void X86FrameLowering::emitStackProbeCall(MachineFunction &MF, bool InProlog) const { bool IsLargeCodeModel = MF.getTarget().getCodeModel() == CodeModel::Large; + // FIXME: Add retpoline support and remove this. + if (Is64Bit && IsLargeCodeModel && STI.useRetpoline()) + report_fatal_error("Emitting stack probe calls on 64-bit with the large " + "code model and retpoline not yet implemented."); + unsigned CallOp; if (Is64Bit) CallOp = IsLargeCodeModel ? X86::CALL64r : X86::CALL64pcrel32; @@ -2345,6 +2350,10 @@ void X86FrameLowering::adjustForSegmentedStacks( // This solution is not perfect, as it assumes that the .rodata section // is laid out within 2^31 bytes of each function body, but this seems // to be sufficient for JIT. + // FIXME: Add retpoline support and remove the error here.. + if (STI.useRetpoline()) + report_fatal_error("Emitting morestack calls on 64-bit with the large " + "code model and retpoline not yet implemented."); BuildMI(allocMBB, DL, TII.get(X86::CALL64m)) .addReg(X86::RIP) .addImm(0) |