summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp')
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp467
1 files changed, 410 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp b/test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp
index cc47c92360a57..7e678a1ec78d4 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/auto-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp
@@ -1,8 +1,25 @@
-// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG %s > %t 2>&1
-// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++98 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=false %s > %t 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,CXX98,WARNINGS,CXX98-WARNINGS %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++98 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=true %s > %t 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,CXX98,ANALYZER,CXX98-ANALYZER %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=false %s > %t 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,CXX11,WARNINGS,CXX11-WARNINGS %s
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=true %s > %t 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,CXX11,ANALYZER,CXX11-ANALYZER %s
+
+// This file tests how we construct two different flavors of the Clang CFG -
+// the CFG used by the Sema analysis-based warnings and the CFG used by the
+// static analyzer. The difference in the behavior is checked via FileCheck
+// prefixes (WARNINGS and ANALYZER respectively). When introducing new analyzer
+// flags, no new run lines should be added - just these flags would go to the
+// respective line depending on where is it turned on and where is it turned
+// off. Feel free to add tests that test only one of the CFG flavors if you're
+// not sure how the other flavor is supposed to work in your case.
class A {
public:
+ int x;
+
// CHECK: [B1 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
@@ -32,12 +49,14 @@ extern const bool UV;
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B1]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: const A &b = a;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.9], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (BindTemporary)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B1.7] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: [B1.8]
@@ -57,9 +76,292 @@ void test_const_ref() {
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B1]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A [2])
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX98-ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX98-NEXT: 3: [B1.2].x
+// CXX98-NEXT: 4: [B1.3]
+// CXX98-NEXT: 5: const int &x = A().x;
+// CXX98-NEXT: 6: [B1.5].~A() (Implicit destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 3: [B1.2]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 4: [B1.3].x
+// CXX11-NEXT: 5: [B1.4] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const int)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 6: const int &x = A().x;
+// CXX11-NEXT: 7: [B1.6].~A() (Implicit destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
+void test_const_ref_to_field() {
+ const int &x = A().x;
+}
+
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX98-ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX98-NEXT: 3: A::x
+// CXX98-NEXT: 4: &[B1.3]
+// CXX98-NEXT: 5: [B1.2] .* [B1.4]
+// CXX98-NEXT: 6: [B1.5]
+// CXX98-NEXT: 7: const int &x = A() .* &A::x;
+// CXX98-NEXT: 8: [B1.7].~A() (Implicit destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 3: [B1.2]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 4: A::x
+// CXX11-NEXT: 5: &[B1.4]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 6: [B1.3] .* [B1.5]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const int)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 8: const int &x = A() .* &A::x;
+// CXX11-NEXT: 9: [B1.8].~A() (Implicit destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
+void test_pointer_to_member() {
+ const int &x = A().*&A::x;
+}
+
+// FIXME: There should be automatic destructors at the end of scope.
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.4], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 5: {[B1.4]}
+// CHECK-NEXT: 6: B b = {A()};
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 7: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 7: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.10], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B1.7] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 9: [B1.8] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 10: [B1.9]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 11: {[B1.10]}
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 12: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 12: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.15], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 13: [B1.12] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 14: [B1.13] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 15: [B1.14]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 16: {[B1.15]}
+// CHECK-NEXT: 17: {[B1.10], [B1.15]}
+// CHECK-NEXT: 18: B bb[2] = {A(), A()};
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
+void test_aggregate_lifetime_extension() {
+ struct B {
+ const A &x;
+ };
+
+ B b = {A()};
+ B bb[2] = {A(), A()};
+}
+
+// In C++98 such class 'C' will not be an aggregate.
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+// FIXME: There should be automatic destructors at the end of the scope.
+// CXX11: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CXX11-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
+// CXX11: [B1]
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], [B1.4], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 4: [B1.3]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 5: [B1.4] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.7], [B1.9], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 8: [B1.7] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 9: [B1.8]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 10: [B1.9] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CXX11-NEXT: 11: {[B1.2], [B1.7]}
+// CXX11-NEXT: 12: [B1.11] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 13: [B1.12]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 14: {[B1.13]}
+// Double curly braces trigger regexps, escape as per FileCheck manual.
+// CXX11-NEXT: 15: C c = {{[{][{]}}A(), A(){{[}][}]}};
+// CXX11-NEXT: 16: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 17: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 18: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 18: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.19], [B1.21], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 19: [B1.18] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 20: [B1.19] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 21: [B1.20]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 22: [B1.21] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 23: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 23: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.24], [B1.26], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 24: [B1.23] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 25: [B1.24] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 26: [B1.25]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 27: [B1.26] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CXX11-NEXT: 28: {[B1.19], [B1.24]}
+// CXX11-NEXT: 29: [B1.28] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 30: [B1.29]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 31: {[B1.30]}
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 32: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 32: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.33], [B1.35], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 33: [B1.32] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 34: [B1.33] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 35: [B1.34]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 36: [B1.35] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// CXX11-WARNINGS-NEXT: 37: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// CXX11-ANALYZER-NEXT: 37: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.38], [B1.40], class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 38: [B1.37] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 39: [B1.38] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 40: [B1.39]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 41: [B1.40] (CXXConstructExpr, const class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CXX11-NEXT: 42: {[B1.33], [B1.38]}
+// CXX11-NEXT: 43: [B1.42] (BindTemporary)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 44: [B1.43]
+// CXX11-NEXT: 45: {[B1.44]}
+// Double curly braces trigger regexps, escape as per FileCheck manual.
+// CXX11-NEXT: 46: {{[{][{]}}[B1.30]}, {[B1.44]{{[}][}]}}
+// Double curly braces trigger regexps, escape as per FileCheck manual.
+// CXX11-NEXT: 47: C cc[2] = {{[{][{][{]}}A(), A(){{[}][}]}}, {{[{][{]}}A(), A(){{[}][}][}]}};
+// CXX11-NEXT: 48: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 49: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 50: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: 51: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CXX11-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
+// CXX11-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
+// CXX11: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CXX11-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
+void test_aggregate_array_lifetime_extension() {
+ struct C {
+ const A (&z)[2];
+ };
+
+ // Until C++17 there are elidable copies here, so there should be 9 temporary
+ // destructors of A()s. There are no destructors of 'c' and 'cc' because this
+ // aggregate has no destructor. Instead, arrays are lifetime-extended,
+ // and copies of A()s within them need to be destroyed via automatic
+ // destructors.
+ C c = {{A(), A()}};
+ C cc[2] = {{{A(), A()}}, {{A(), A()}}};
+}
+#endif
+
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], [B1.4], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B1.4] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 6: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.7], [B1.9], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B1.7] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 9: [B1.8]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 10: [B1.9] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 11: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 11: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.12], [B1.14], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 12: [B1.11] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 13: [B1.12] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 14: [B1.13]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 15: [B1.14] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 16: {[B1.7], [B1.12]}
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 17: {[B1.2], {[B1.7], [B1.12]}}
+// CHECK-NEXT: 18: D d = {A(), {A(), A()}};
+// CHECK-NEXT: 19: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 20: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 21: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 22: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 22: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.23], [B1.25], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 23: [B1.22] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 24: [B1.23] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 25: [B1.24]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 26: [B1.25] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 27: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 27: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.28], [B1.30], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 28: [B1.27] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 29: [B1.28] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 30: [B1.29]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 31: [B1.30] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 32: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 32: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.33], [B1.35], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 33: [B1.32] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 34: [B1.33] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 35: [B1.34]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 36: [B1.35] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 37: {[B1.28], [B1.33]}
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 38: {[B1.23], {[B1.28], [B1.33]}}
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 39: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 39: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.40], [B1.42], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 40: [B1.39] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 41: [B1.40] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 42: [B1.41]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 43: [B1.42] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 44: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 44: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.45], [B1.47], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 45: [B1.44] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 46: [B1.45] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 47: [B1.46]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 48: [B1.47] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 49: A() (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 49: A() (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.50], [B1.52], class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 50: [B1.49] (BindTemporary)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 51: [B1.50] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 52: [B1.51]
+// CHECK-NEXT: 53: [B1.52] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 54: {[B1.45], [B1.50]}
+// FIXME: Why does it look as if the initializer list consumes uncopied objects?
+// CHECK-NEXT: 55: {[B1.40], {[B1.45], [B1.50]}}
+// Double curly braces trigger regexps, escape as per FileCheck manual.
+// CHECK-NEXT: 56: {{[{][{]}}[B1.23], {[B1.28], [B1.33]{{[}][}]}}, {[B1.40], {[B1.45], [B1.50]{{[}][}][}]}}
+// Double curly braces trigger regexps, escape as per FileCheck manual.
+// CHECK-NEXT: 57: D dd[2] = {{[{][{]}}A(), {A(), A(){{[}][}]}}, {A(), {A(), A(){{[}][}][}]}};
+// CHECK-NEXT: 58: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 59: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 60: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 61: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 62: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 63: ~A() (Temporary object destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 64: [B1.57].~D() (Implicit destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: 65: [B1.18].~D() (Implicit destructor)
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
+// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
+void test_aggregate_with_nontrivial_own_destructor() {
+ struct D {
+ A y;
+ A w[2];
+ };
+
+ // Until C++17 there are elidable copies here, so there should be 9 temporary
+ // destructors of A()s. Destructors of 'd' and 'dd' should implicitly
+ // take care of the copies, so there should not be automatic destructors
+ // for copies of A()s.
+ D d = {A(), {A(), A()}};
+ D dd[2] = {{A(), {A(), A()}}, {A(), {A(), A()}}};
+}
+
+// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
+// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
+// CHECK: [B1]
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A [2])
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A [2])
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a[2];
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A [0])
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A [0])
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.4], class A [0])
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b[0];
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B1.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
@@ -74,15 +376,19 @@ void test_array() {
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B1]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A c;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 5: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 5: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 5: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.6], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B1.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 9: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 9: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 9: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.10], class A)
// CHECK: 10: A b;
// CHECK: 11: [B1.10].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK: 12: [B1.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -101,7 +407,8 @@ void test_scope() {
// CHECK: [B4 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B3
// CHECK: [B1]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B3.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -115,9 +422,11 @@ void test_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B3
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B3.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -137,7 +446,8 @@ void test_return() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B7
// CHECK: [B1]
// CHECK: l1:
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B6.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -145,7 +455,8 @@ void test_return() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B3
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A b;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B2.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B6.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -170,9 +481,11 @@ void test_return() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B6
// CHECK: [B6]
// CHECK: l0:
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B6.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A b;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B6.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B6.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -180,7 +493,8 @@ void test_return() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B7 B5
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B5 B4
// CHECK: [B7]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B7.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B8
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B6
@@ -207,23 +521,27 @@ l1:
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B3
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B2.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B4
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B4
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B4]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B4.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B4.4] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 5: [B4.4] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 5: [B4.4] (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.6], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: A b = a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B4.7] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -247,14 +565,16 @@ void test_if_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B8
// CHECK: [B1]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: [B8.6].~A() (Implicit destructor)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: A e;
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B8.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B5
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B2.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B4.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -268,7 +588,8 @@ void test_if_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B4
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B4]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B4.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -276,7 +597,8 @@ void test_if_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B8
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B3 B2
// CHECK: [B5]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B5.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B5.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B7.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -290,7 +612,8 @@ void test_if_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B7
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B7]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B7.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B7.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -298,11 +621,13 @@ void test_if_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B8
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B6 B5
// CHECK: [B8]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B8.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B8.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B8.4] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 5: [B8.4] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 5: [B8.4] (CXXConstructExpr, [B8.6], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: A b = a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B8.7] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -340,7 +665,8 @@ void test_if_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B3
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B4
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B4.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -349,7 +675,8 @@ void test_if_jumps() {
// CHECK: [B4]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B4.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b = a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B4.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -361,7 +688,8 @@ void test_if_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B5
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B3 B1
// CHECK: [B5]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B5.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B6
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B4
@@ -377,7 +705,8 @@ void test_while_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B11
// CHECK: [B1]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: [B10.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: A e;
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B11.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -387,7 +716,8 @@ void test_while_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B6
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B10
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -425,7 +755,8 @@ void test_while_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: Preds (1): B9
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B9]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B9.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -435,7 +766,8 @@ void test_while_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: [B10]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B10.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, [B10.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b = a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B10.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -447,7 +779,8 @@ void test_while_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B11
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B9 B1
// CHECK: [B11]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B11.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B12
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B10
@@ -474,7 +807,8 @@ void test_while_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B3 B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B2.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B4
@@ -492,7 +826,8 @@ void test_do_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: [B12 (ENTRY)]
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B11
// CHECK: [B1]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B11.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -505,7 +840,8 @@ void test_do_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B6
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B10 B1
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -540,7 +876,8 @@ void test_do_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: Preds (1): B9
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B9]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B9.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A b;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -551,7 +888,8 @@ void test_do_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B9
// CHECK: [B11]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B11.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B12
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B9
@@ -577,7 +915,8 @@ void test_do_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B2
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B2.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -592,7 +931,8 @@ void test_do_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B4
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
@@ -608,14 +948,16 @@ void test_switch_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B2
// CHECK: [B1]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: [B2.6].~A() (Implicit destructor)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: A g;
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B2.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (3): B3 B7 B2
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
// CHECK: [B2]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B2.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B2.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -635,7 +977,8 @@ void test_switch_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: Preds (2): B2 B4
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B4]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A f;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B4.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B8.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -661,7 +1004,8 @@ void test_switch_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B8]
// CHECK: case 0:
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B8.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B8.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -696,7 +1040,8 @@ void test_switch_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B3
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B4
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A c;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B4.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -705,7 +1050,8 @@ void test_switch_jumps() {
// CHECK: [B4]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: a
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B4.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] (CXXConstructExpr, [B4.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b = a;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B4.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -717,7 +1063,8 @@ void test_switch_jumps() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B5
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B3 B1
// CHECK: [B5]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B5.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B6
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B4
@@ -733,7 +1080,8 @@ void test_for_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: [B1]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: [B10.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B11.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A f;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B1.4].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B11.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -743,7 +1091,8 @@ void test_for_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B6
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B10
// CHECK: [B3]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B3.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A e;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.2].~A() (Implicit destructor)
@@ -781,7 +1130,8 @@ void test_for_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: Preds (1): B9
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
// CHECK: [B9]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B9.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A d;
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: UV
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B9.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, _Bool)
@@ -791,7 +1141,8 @@ void test_for_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK: [B10]
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: b
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B10.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: [B10.2] (CXXConstructExpr, [B10.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A c = b;
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: c
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B10.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const class A)
@@ -803,9 +1154,11 @@ void test_for_implicit_scope() {
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B2 B11
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B9 B1
// CHECK: [B11]
-// CHECK-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B11.2], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: A a;
-// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
+// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B11.4], class A)
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A b;
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B12
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B10