summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp')
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp b/test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp
index 70d3f0c748203..656f91189b4fe 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/copypaste/macro-complexity.cpp
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -analyzer-config alpha.clone.CloneChecker:MinimumCloneComplexity=10 -verify %s
// Tests that the complexity value of a macro expansion is about the same as
-// the complexity value of a normal function call and the the macro body doesn't
+// the complexity value of a normal function call and the macro body doesn't
// influence the complexity. See the CloneSignature class in CloneDetection.h
// for more information about complexity values of clones.
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ int manualMacroClone(int a, int b) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}}
}
// Now we actually use the macro to generate the same AST as above. They
-// shouldn't be reported because the macros only slighly increase the complexity
+// shouldn't be reported because the macros only slightly increase the complexity
// value and the resulting code will never pass the MinimumCloneComplexity
// constraint.