summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp')
-rw-r--r--test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp21
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..7237fbf9db7f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/cxx03-aligned-allocation-unscoped-enum.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++03 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu %s \
+// RUN: -faligned-allocation -emit-llvm -o - -Wno-c++11-extensions | FileCheck %s
+
+// Ensure Clang doesn't confuse std::align_val_t with the sized deallocation
+// parameter when the enum type is unscoped. Libc++ does this in C++03 in order
+// to support aligned allocation in that dialect.
+
+using size_t = __decltype(sizeof(0));
+
+namespace std {
+enum align_val_t : size_t {};
+}
+_Static_assert(__is_same(__underlying_type(std::align_val_t), size_t), "");
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void @_Z1fPi(
+void f(int *p) {
+ // CHECK-NOT: call void @_ZdlPvSt11align_val_t(
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZdlPv(
+ // CHECK: ret void
+ delete p;
+}