diff options
author | Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-11-04 14:58:56 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-11-04 14:58:56 +0000 |
commit | 36bf506ad3c99a309ca8bd73bd03563d8d068ac0 (patch) | |
tree | b4dc751bcee540346911aa4115729eff2f991657 /lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp | |
parent | f9666f9b3a3d26810deae8cd54feb6e47ecee61a (diff) |
Notes
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp | 51 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp index 2518ce152090..cf90aba86b30 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp @@ -177,7 +177,24 @@ void RegScavenger::forward() { if (!Reg || isReserved(Reg)) continue; if (MO.isUse()) { - assert(isUsed(Reg) && "Using an undefined register!"); + if (!isUsed(Reg)) { + // Check if it's partial live: e.g. + // D0 = insert_subreg D0<undef>, S0 + // ... D0 + // The problem is the insert_subreg could be eliminated. The use of + // D0 is using a partially undef value. This is not *incorrect* since + // S1 is can be freely clobbered. + // Ideally we would like a way to model this, but leaving the + // insert_subreg around causes both correctness and performance issues. + bool SubUsed = false; + for (const unsigned *SubRegs = TRI->getSubRegisters(Reg); + unsigned SubReg = *SubRegs; ++SubRegs) + if (isUsed(SubReg)) { + SubUsed = true; + break; + } + assert(SubUsed && "Using an undefined register!"); + } assert((!EarlyClobberRegs.test(Reg) || MI->isRegTiedToDefOperand(i)) && "Using an early clobbered register!"); } else { @@ -227,7 +244,7 @@ unsigned RegScavenger::FindUnusedReg(const TargetRegisterClass *RC) const { /// /// No more than InstrLimit instructions are inspected. /// -unsigned RegScavenger::findSurvivorReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI, +unsigned RegScavenger::findSurvivorReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator StartMI, BitVector &Candidates, unsigned InstrLimit, MachineBasicBlock::iterator &UseMI) { @@ -235,19 +252,37 @@ unsigned RegScavenger::findSurvivorReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI, assert(Survivor > 0 && "No candidates for scavenging"); MachineBasicBlock::iterator ME = MBB->getFirstTerminator(); - assert(MI != ME && "MI already at terminator"); + assert(StartMI != ME && "MI already at terminator"); + MachineBasicBlock::iterator RestorePointMI = StartMI; + MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI = StartMI; + bool inVirtLiveRange = false; for (++MI; InstrLimit > 0 && MI != ME; ++MI, --InstrLimit) { + bool isVirtKillInsn = false; + bool isVirtDefInsn = false; // Remove any candidates touched by instruction. for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) { const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i); - if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isUndef() || !MO.getReg() || - TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) + if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isUndef() || !MO.getReg()) continue; + if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) { + if (MO.isDef()) + isVirtDefInsn = true; + else if (MO.isKill()) + isVirtKillInsn = true; + continue; + } Candidates.reset(MO.getReg()); for (const unsigned *R = TRI->getAliasSet(MO.getReg()); *R; R++) Candidates.reset(*R); } + // If we're not in a virtual reg's live range, this is a valid + // restore point. + if (!inVirtLiveRange) RestorePointMI = MI; + + // Update whether we're in the live range of a virtual register + if (isVirtKillInsn) inVirtLiveRange = false; + if (isVirtDefInsn) inVirtLiveRange = true; // Was our survivor untouched by this instruction? if (Candidates.test(Survivor)) @@ -259,9 +294,13 @@ unsigned RegScavenger::findSurvivorReg(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI, Survivor = Candidates.find_first(); } + // If we ran off the end, that's where we want to restore. + if (MI == ME) RestorePointMI = ME; + assert (RestorePointMI != StartMI && + "No available scavenger restore location!"); // We ran out of candidates, so stop the search. - UseMI = MI; + UseMI = RestorePointMI; return Survivor; } |