4 files changed, 0 insertions, 150 deletions

diff --git a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/.categories b/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/.categories
deleted file mode 100644
index 897e40a99dda..000000000000
--- a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/.categories
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-expression
diff --git a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/Makefile b/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/Makefile
deleted file mode 100644
index a10791d58907..000000000000
--- a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/Makefile
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-LEVEL = ../../make
-
-C_SOURCES := locking.c
-ENABLE_THREADS := YES
-
-include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.rules
diff --git a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/TestExprDoesntBlock.py b/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/TestExprDoesntBlock.py
deleted file mode 100644
index a498f0a360ee..000000000000
--- a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/TestExprDoesntBlock.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-"""
-Test that expr will time out and allow other threads to run if it blocks.
-"""
-
-from __future__ import print_function
-
-
-import os
-import time
-import re
-import lldb
-from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
-from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
-from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
-
-
-class ExprDoesntDeadlockTestCase(TestBase):
-
-    mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
-
-    @expectedFailureAll(oslist=['freebsd'], bugnumber='llvm.org/pr17946')
-    @expectedFailureAll(
-        oslist=["windows"],
-        bugnumber="Windows doesn't have pthreads, test needs to be ported")
-    @add_test_categories(["basic_process"])
-    def test_with_run_command(self):
-        """Test that expr will time out and allow other threads to run if it blocks."""
-        self.build()
-        exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
-
-        # Create a target by the debugger.
-        target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)
-        self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)
-
-        # Now create a breakpoint at source line before call_me_to_get_lock
-        # gets called.
-
-        main_file_spec = lldb.SBFileSpec("locking.c")
-        breakpoint = target.BreakpointCreateBySourceRegex(
-            'Break here', main_file_spec)
-        if self.TraceOn():
-            print("breakpoint:", breakpoint)
-        self.assertTrue(breakpoint and
-                        breakpoint.GetNumLocations() == 1,
-                        VALID_BREAKPOINT)
-
-        # Now launch the process, and do not stop at entry point.
-        process = target.LaunchSimple(
-            None, None, self.get_process_working_directory())
-        self.assertTrue(process, PROCESS_IS_VALID)
-
-        # Frame #0 should be on self.line1 and the break condition should hold.
-        from lldbsuite.test.lldbutil import get_stopped_thread
-        thread = get_stopped_thread(process, lldb.eStopReasonBreakpoint)
-        self.assertTrue(
-            thread.IsValid(),
-            "There should be a thread stopped due to breakpoint condition")
-
-        frame0 = thread.GetFrameAtIndex(0)
-
-        var = frame0.EvaluateExpression("call_me_to_get_lock()")
-        self.assertTrue(var.IsValid())
-        self.assertTrue(var.GetValueAsSigned(0) == 567)
diff --git a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/locking.c b/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/locking.c
deleted file mode 100644
index fae9979611d5..000000000000
--- a/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/expr-doesnt-deadlock/locking.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-#include <pthread.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-
-pthread_mutex_t contended_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
-
-pthread_mutex_t control_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
-pthread_cond_t  control_condition;
-
-pthread_mutex_t thread_started_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
-pthread_cond_t  thread_started_condition;
-
-// This function runs in a thread.  The locking dance is to make sure that 
-// by the time the main thread reaches the pthread_join below, this thread
-// has for sure acquired the contended_mutex.  So then the call_me_to_get_lock
-// function will block trying to get the mutex, and only succeed once it
-// signals this thread, then lets it run to wake up from the cond_wait and
-// release the mutex.
-
-void *
-lock_acquirer_1 (void *input)
-{
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&contended_mutex);
-  
-  // Grab this mutex, that will ensure that the main thread
-  // is in its cond_wait for it (since that's when it drops the mutex.
-
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_started_mutex);
-  pthread_mutex_unlock(&thread_started_mutex);
-
-  // Now signal the main thread that it can continue, we have the contended lock
-  // so the call to call_me_to_get_lock won't make any progress till  this
-  // thread gets a chance to run.
-
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&control_mutex);
-
-  pthread_cond_signal (&thread_started_condition);
-
-  pthread_cond_wait (&control_condition, &control_mutex);
-
-  pthread_mutex_unlock (&contended_mutex);
-  return NULL;
-}
-
-int
-call_me_to_get_lock ()
-{
-  pthread_cond_signal (&control_condition);
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&contended_mutex);
-  return 567;
-}
-
-int main ()
-{
-  pthread_t thread_1;
-
-  pthread_cond_init (&control_condition, NULL);
-  pthread_cond_init (&thread_started_condition, NULL);
-
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&thread_started_mutex);
-
-  pthread_create (&thread_1, NULL, lock_acquirer_1, NULL);
-  
-  pthread_cond_wait (&thread_started_condition, &thread_started_mutex);
-
-  pthread_mutex_lock (&control_mutex);
-  pthread_mutex_unlock (&control_mutex);
-
-  // Break here.  At this point the other thread will have the contended_mutex,
-  // and be sitting in its cond_wait for the control condition.  So there is
-  // no way that our by-hand calling of call_me_to_get_lock will proceed
-  // without running the first thread at least somewhat.
-
-  call_me_to_get_lock();
-  pthread_join (thread_1, NULL);
-
-  return 0;
-
-}