vendor/clang/clang-release_33-r183502

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/test/Analysis/reference.cpp b/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
index 8dd0baf8c3c8..1dabe7bc1a3d 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/reference.cpp
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void testRetroactiveNullReference(int *x) {
   // "null reference". So the 'if' statement ought to be dead code.
   // However, Clang (and other compilers) don't actually check that a pointer
   // value is non-null in the implementation of references, so it is possible
-  // to produce a supposed "null reference" at runtime. The analyzer shoeuld
+  // to produce a supposed "null reference" at runtime. The analyzer should
   // still warn when it can prove such errors.
   int &y = *x;
   if (x != 0)
@@ -224,3 +224,13 @@ namespace rdar11212286 {
     return *x; // no-warning
   }
 }
+
+namespace PR15694 {
+  class C {
+    bool bit : 1;
+    template <class T> void bar(const T &obj) {}
+    void foo() {
+      bar(bit); // don't crash
+    }
+  };
+}