diff options
| author | Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> | 2017-05-22 19:43:28 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> | 2017-05-22 19:43:28 +0000 |
| commit | b5630dbadf9a2a06754194387d6b0fd9962a67f1 (patch) | |
| tree | 3fe1e2bc0dc2823ab21f06959fbb3eaca317ea29 /test/Transforms/JumpThreading | |
| parent | 7af96fb3afd6725a2824a0a5ca5dad34e5e0b056 (diff) | |
Notes
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Transforms/JumpThreading')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/Transforms/JumpThreading/assume.ll | 44 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/Transforms/JumpThreading/fold-not-thread.ll | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/Transforms/JumpThreading/guards.ll | 94 |
3 files changed, 140 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/assume.ll b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/assume.ll index 53010b71c728..3a039676e172 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/assume.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/assume.ll @@ -56,6 +56,50 @@ return: ; preds = %entry, %if.then ret i32 %retval.0 } +@g = external global i32 + +; Check that we do prove a fact using an assume within the block. +; FIXME: We can fold the assume based on the semantics of assume. +; CHECK-LABEL: @can_fold_assume +; CHECK: %notnull = icmp ne i32* %array, null +; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 %notnull) +; CHECK-NEXT: ret void +define void @can_fold_assume(i32* %array) { + %notnull = icmp ne i32* %array, null + call void @llvm.assume(i1 %notnull) + br i1 %notnull, label %normal, label %error + +normal: + ret void + +error: + store atomic i32 0, i32* @g unordered, align 4 + ret void +} + +declare void @f(i1) +declare void @exit() +; We can fold the assume but not the uses before the assume. +define void @dont_fold_incorrectly(i32* %array) { +; CHECK-LABEL:@dont_fold_incorrectly +; CHECK: @f(i1 %notnull) +; CHECK-NEXT: exit() +; CHECK-NEXT: assume(i1 %notnull) +; CHECK-NEXT: ret void + %notnull = icmp ne i32* %array, null + call void @f(i1 %notnull) + call void @exit() + call void @llvm.assume(i1 %notnull) + br i1 %notnull, label %normal, label %error + +normal: + ret void + +error: + store atomic i32 0, i32* @g unordered, align 4 + ret void +} + ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1 diff --git a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/fold-not-thread.ll b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/fold-not-thread.ll index 06ddc10e02b6..f05169b31bc8 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/fold-not-thread.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/fold-not-thread.ll @@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ L3: ret void } -; Make sure we can do the RAUW for %add... +; FIXME: Make sure we can do the RAUW for %add... ; ; CHECK-LABEL: @rauw_if_possible( -; CHECK: call void @f4(i32 96) +; CHECK: call void @f4(i32 %add) define void @rauw_if_possible(i32 %value) nounwind { entry: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %value, 32 diff --git a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/guards.ll b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/guards.ll index eac2b5dcd85f..c5f72b113efc 100644 --- a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/guards.ll +++ b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/guards.ll @@ -181,3 +181,97 @@ Exit: ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void ret void } + +declare void @never_called() + +; Assume the guard is always taken and we deoptimize, so we never reach the +; branch below that guard. We should *never* change the behaviour of a guard from +; `must deoptimize` to `may deoptimize`, since this affects the program +; semantics. +define void @dont_fold_guard(i8* %addr, i32 %i, i32 %length) { +; CHECK-LABEL: dont_fold_guard +; CHECK: experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) + +entry: + br label %BBPred + +BBPred: + %cond = icmp eq i8* %addr, null + br i1 %cond, label %zero, label %not_zero + +zero: + unreachable + +not_zero: + %c1 = icmp ult i32 %i, %length + %c2 = icmp eq i32 %i, 0 + %wide.chk = and i1 %c1, %c2 + call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %wide.chk) [ "deopt"() ] + br i1 %c2, label %unreachedBB2, label %unreachedBB1 + +unreachedBB2: + call void @never_called() + ret void + +unreachedBB1: + ret void +} + + +; same as dont_fold_guard1 but condition %cmp is not an instruction. +; We cannot fold the guard under any circumstance. +; FIXME: We can merge unreachableBB2 into not_zero. +define void @dont_fold_guard2(i8* %addr, i1 %cmp, i32 %i, i32 %length) { +; CHECK-LABEL: dont_fold_guard2 +; CHECK: guard(i1 %cmp) + +entry: + br label %BBPred + +BBPred: + %cond = icmp eq i8* %addr, null + br i1 %cond, label %zero, label %not_zero + +zero: + unreachable + +not_zero: + call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ] + br i1 %cmp, label %unreachedBB2, label %unreachedBB1 + +unreachedBB2: + call void @never_called() + ret void + +unreachedBB1: + ret void +} + +; Same as dont_fold_guard1 but use switch instead of branch. +; triggers source code `ProcessThreadableEdges`. +declare void @f(i1) +define void @dont_fold_guard3(i1 %cmp1, i32 %i) nounwind { +; CHECK-LABEL: dont_fold_guard3 +; CHECK-LABEL: L2: +; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %i, 0 +; CHECK-NEXT: guard(i1 %cmp) +; CHECK-NEXT: @f(i1 %cmp) +; CHECK-NEXT: ret void +entry: + br i1 %cmp1, label %L0, label %L3 +L0: + %cmp = icmp eq i32 %i, 0 + call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %cmp) [ "deopt"() ] + switch i1 %cmp, label %L3 [ + i1 false, label %L1 + i1 true, label %L2 + ] + +L1: + ret void +L2: + call void @f(i1 %cmp) + ret void +L3: + ret void +} |
