diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp | 264 |
1 files changed, 264 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..396e0ed2e76c --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@ +//===- AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes.cpp ----------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// This is a variant of the UnifyDivergentExitNodes pass. Rather than ensuring +// there is at most one ret and one unreachable instruction, it ensures there is +// at most one divergent exiting block. +// +// StructurizeCFG can't deal with multi-exit regions formed by branches to +// multiple return nodes. It is not desirable to structurize regions with +// uniform branches, so unifying those to the same return block as divergent +// branches inhibits use of scalar branching. It still can't deal with the case +// where one branch goes to return, and one unreachable. Replace unreachable in +// this case with a return. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "AMDGPU.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/LegacyDivergenceAnalysis.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" +#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h" +#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h" +#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Function.h" +#include "llvm/IR/InstrTypes.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Type.h" +#include "llvm/Pass.h" +#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h" +#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" +#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils.h" + +using namespace llvm; + +#define DEBUG_TYPE "amdgpu-unify-divergent-exit-nodes" + +namespace { + +class AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes : public FunctionPass { +public: + static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid + + AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes() : FunctionPass(ID) { + initializeAMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodesPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); + } + + // We can preserve non-critical-edgeness when we unify function exit nodes + void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override; + bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override; +}; + +} // end anonymous namespace + +char AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes::ID = 0; + +char &llvm::AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodesID = AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes::ID; + +INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes, DEBUG_TYPE, + "Unify divergent function exit nodes", false, false) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LegacyDivergenceAnalysis) +INITIALIZE_PASS_END(AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes, DEBUG_TYPE, + "Unify divergent function exit nodes", false, false) + +void AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const{ + // TODO: Preserve dominator tree. + AU.addRequired<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); + + AU.addRequired<LegacyDivergenceAnalysis>(); + + // No divergent values are changed, only blocks and branch edges. + AU.addPreserved<LegacyDivergenceAnalysis>(); + + // We preserve the non-critical-edgeness property + AU.addPreservedID(BreakCriticalEdgesID); + + // This is a cluster of orthogonal Transforms + AU.addPreservedID(LowerSwitchID); + FunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU); + + AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>(); +} + +/// \returns true if \p BB is reachable through only uniform branches. +/// XXX - Is there a more efficient way to find this? +static bool isUniformlyReached(const LegacyDivergenceAnalysis &DA, + BasicBlock &BB) { + SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> Stack; + SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 8> Visited; + + for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(&BB)) + Stack.push_back(Pred); + + while (!Stack.empty()) { + BasicBlock *Top = Stack.pop_back_val(); + if (!DA.isUniform(Top->getTerminator())) + return false; + + for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(Top)) { + if (Visited.insert(Pred).second) + Stack.push_back(Pred); + } + } + + return true; +} + +static BasicBlock *unifyReturnBlockSet(Function &F, + ArrayRef<BasicBlock *> ReturningBlocks, + const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, + StringRef Name) { + // Otherwise, we need to insert a new basic block into the function, add a PHI + // nodes (if the function returns values), and convert all of the return + // instructions into unconditional branches. + BasicBlock *NewRetBlock = BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), Name, &F); + + PHINode *PN = nullptr; + if (F.getReturnType()->isVoidTy()) { + ReturnInst::Create(F.getContext(), nullptr, NewRetBlock); + } else { + // If the function doesn't return void... add a PHI node to the block... + PN = PHINode::Create(F.getReturnType(), ReturningBlocks.size(), + "UnifiedRetVal"); + NewRetBlock->getInstList().push_back(PN); + ReturnInst::Create(F.getContext(), PN, NewRetBlock); + } + + // Loop over all of the blocks, replacing the return instruction with an + // unconditional branch. + for (BasicBlock *BB : ReturningBlocks) { + // Add an incoming element to the PHI node for every return instruction that + // is merging into this new block... + if (PN) + PN->addIncoming(BB->getTerminator()->getOperand(0), BB); + + // Remove and delete the return inst. + BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); + BranchInst::Create(NewRetBlock, BB); + } + + for (BasicBlock *BB : ReturningBlocks) { + // Cleanup possible branch to unconditional branch to the return. + simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, {2}); + } + + return NewRetBlock; +} + +bool AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes::runOnFunction(Function &F) { + auto &PDT = getAnalysis<PostDominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getPostDomTree(); + if (PDT.getRoots().size() <= 1) + return false; + + LegacyDivergenceAnalysis &DA = getAnalysis<LegacyDivergenceAnalysis>(); + + // Loop over all of the blocks in a function, tracking all of the blocks that + // return. + SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ReturningBlocks; + SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> UnreachableBlocks; + + // Dummy return block for infinite loop. + BasicBlock *DummyReturnBB = nullptr; + + for (BasicBlock *BB : PDT.getRoots()) { + if (isa<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator())) { + if (!isUniformlyReached(DA, *BB)) + ReturningBlocks.push_back(BB); + } else if (isa<UnreachableInst>(BB->getTerminator())) { + if (!isUniformlyReached(DA, *BB)) + UnreachableBlocks.push_back(BB); + } else if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator())) { + + ConstantInt *BoolTrue = ConstantInt::getTrue(F.getContext()); + if (DummyReturnBB == nullptr) { + DummyReturnBB = BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), + "DummyReturnBlock", &F); + Type *RetTy = F.getReturnType(); + Value *RetVal = RetTy->isVoidTy() ? nullptr : UndefValue::get(RetTy); + ReturnInst::Create(F.getContext(), RetVal, DummyReturnBB); + ReturningBlocks.push_back(DummyReturnBB); + } + + if (BI->isUnconditional()) { + BasicBlock *LoopHeaderBB = BI->getSuccessor(0); + BI->eraseFromParent(); // Delete the unconditional branch. + // Add a new conditional branch with a dummy edge to the return block. + BranchInst::Create(LoopHeaderBB, DummyReturnBB, BoolTrue, BB); + } else { // Conditional branch. + // Create a new transition block to hold the conditional branch. + BasicBlock *TransitionBB = BB->splitBasicBlock(BI, "TransitionBlock"); + + // Create a branch that will always branch to the transition block and + // references DummyReturnBB. + BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); + BranchInst::Create(TransitionBB, DummyReturnBB, BoolTrue, BB); + } + } + } + + if (!UnreachableBlocks.empty()) { + BasicBlock *UnreachableBlock = nullptr; + + if (UnreachableBlocks.size() == 1) { + UnreachableBlock = UnreachableBlocks.front(); + } else { + UnreachableBlock = BasicBlock::Create(F.getContext(), + "UnifiedUnreachableBlock", &F); + new UnreachableInst(F.getContext(), UnreachableBlock); + + for (BasicBlock *BB : UnreachableBlocks) { + // Remove and delete the unreachable inst. + BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); + BranchInst::Create(UnreachableBlock, BB); + } + } + + if (!ReturningBlocks.empty()) { + // Don't create a new unreachable inst if we have a return. The + // structurizer/annotator can't handle the multiple exits + + Type *RetTy = F.getReturnType(); + Value *RetVal = RetTy->isVoidTy() ? nullptr : UndefValue::get(RetTy); + // Remove and delete the unreachable inst. + UnreachableBlock->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); + + Function *UnreachableIntrin = + Intrinsic::getDeclaration(F.getParent(), Intrinsic::amdgcn_unreachable); + + // Insert a call to an intrinsic tracking that this is an unreachable + // point, in case we want to kill the active lanes or something later. + CallInst::Create(UnreachableIntrin, {}, "", UnreachableBlock); + + // Don't create a scalar trap. We would only want to trap if this code was + // really reached, but a scalar trap would happen even if no lanes + // actually reached here. + ReturnInst::Create(F.getContext(), RetVal, UnreachableBlock); + ReturningBlocks.push_back(UnreachableBlock); + } + } + + // Now handle return blocks. + if (ReturningBlocks.empty()) + return false; // No blocks return + + if (ReturningBlocks.size() == 1) + return false; // Already has a single return block + + const TargetTransformInfo &TTI + = getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>().getTTI(F); + + unifyReturnBlockSet(F, ReturningBlocks, TTI, "UnifiedReturnBlock"); + return true; +} |
