diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'examples/python/scripted_step.py')
-rw-r--r-- | examples/python/scripted_step.py | 244 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 244 deletions
diff --git a/examples/python/scripted_step.py b/examples/python/scripted_step.py deleted file mode 100644 index 453b5e229fb4..000000000000 --- a/examples/python/scripted_step.py +++ /dev/null @@ -1,244 +0,0 @@ -############################################################################# -# This script contains two trivial examples of simple "scripted step" classes. -# To fully understand how the lldb "Thread Plan" architecture works, read the -# comments at the beginning of ThreadPlan.h in the lldb sources. The python -# interface is a reduced version of the full internal mechanism, but captures -# most of the power with a much simpler interface. -# -# But I'll attempt a brief summary here. -# Stepping in lldb is done independently for each thread. Moreover, the stepping -# operations are stackable. So for instance if you did a "step over", and in -# the course of stepping over you hit a breakpoint, stopped and stepped again, -# the first "step-over" would be suspended, and the new step operation would -# be enqueued. Then if that step over caused the program to hit another breakpoint, -# lldb would again suspend the second step and return control to the user, so -# now there are two pending step overs. Etc. with all the other stepping -# operations. Then if you hit "continue" the bottom-most step-over would complete, -# and another continue would complete the first "step-over". -# -# lldb represents this system with a stack of "Thread Plans". Each time a new -# stepping operation is requested, a new plan is pushed on the stack. When the -# operation completes, it is pushed off the stack. -# -# The bottom-most plan in the stack is the immediate controller of stepping, -# most importantly, when the process resumes, the bottom most plan will get -# asked whether to set the program running freely, or to instruction-single-step -# the current thread. In the scripted interface, you indicate this by returning -# False or True respectively from the should_step method. -# -# Each time the process stops the thread plan stack for each thread that stopped -# "for a reason", Ii.e. a single-step completed on that thread, or a breakpoint -# was hit), is queried to determine how to proceed, starting from the most -# recently pushed plan, in two stages: -# -# 1) Each plan is asked if it "explains" the stop. The first plan to claim the -# stop wins. In scripted Thread Plans, this is done by returning True from -# the "explains_stop method. This is how, for instance, control is returned -# to the User when the "step-over" plan hits a breakpoint. The step-over -# plan doesn't explain the breakpoint stop, so it returns false, and the -# breakpoint hit is propagated up the stack to the "base" thread plan, which -# is the one that handles random breakpoint hits. -# -# 2) Then the plan that won the first round is asked if the process should stop. -# This is done in the "should_stop" method. The scripted plans actually do -# three jobs in should_stop: -# a) They determine if they have completed their job or not. If they have -# they indicate that by calling SetPlanComplete on their thread plan. -# b) They decide whether they want to return control to the user or not. -# They do this by returning True or False respectively. -# c) If they are not done, they set up whatever machinery they will use -# the next time the thread continues. -# -# Note that deciding to return control to the user, and deciding your plan -# is done, are orthgonal operations. You could set up the next phase of -# stepping, and then return True from should_stop, and when the user next -# "continued" the process your plan would resume control. Of course, the -# user might also "step-over" or some other operation that would push a -# different plan, which would take control till it was done. -# -# One other detail you should be aware of, if the plan below you on the -# stack was done, then it will be popped and the next plan will take control -# and its "should_stop" will be called. -# -# Note also, there should be another method called when your plan is popped, -# to allow you to do whatever cleanup is required. I haven't gotten to that -# yet. For now you should do that at the same time you mark your plan complete. -# -# 3) After the round of negotiation over whether to stop or not is done, all the -# plans get asked if they are "stale". If they are say they are stale -# then they will get popped. This question is asked with the "is_stale" method. -# -# This is useful, for instance, in the FinishPrintAndContinue plan. What might -# happen here is that after continuing but before the finish is done, the program -# could hit another breakpoint and stop. Then the user could use the step -# command repeatedly until they leave the frame of interest by stepping. -# In that case, the step plan is the one that will be responsible for stopping, -# and the finish plan won't be asked should_stop, it will just be asked if it -# is stale. In this case, if the step_out plan that the FinishPrintAndContinue -# plan is driving is stale, so is ours, and it is time to do our printing. -# -# Both examples show stepping through an address range for 20 bytes from the -# current PC. The first one does it by single stepping and checking a condition. -# It doesn't, however handle the case where you step into another frame while -# still in the current range in the starting frame. -# -# That is better handled in the second example by using the built-in StepOverRange -# thread plan. -# -# To use these stepping modes, you would do: -# -# (lldb) command script import scripted_step.py -# (lldb) thread step-scripted -C scripted_step.SimpleStep -# or -# -# (lldb) thread step-scripted -C scripted_step.StepWithPlan - -import lldb - - -class SimpleStep: - - def __init__(self, thread_plan, dict): - self.thread_plan = thread_plan - self.start_address = thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPC() - - def explains_stop(self, event): - # We are stepping, so if we stop for any other reason, it isn't - # because of us. - if self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetStopReason() == lldb.eStopReasonTrace: - return True - else: - return False - - def should_stop(self, event): - cur_pc = self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPC() - - if cur_pc < self.start_address or cur_pc >= self.start_address + 20: - self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) - return True - else: - return False - - def should_step(self): - return True - - -class StepWithPlan: - - def __init__(self, thread_plan, dict): - self.thread_plan = thread_plan - self.start_address = thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0).GetPCAddress() - self.step_thread_plan = thread_plan.QueueThreadPlanForStepOverRange( - self.start_address, 20) - - def explains_stop(self, event): - # Since all I'm doing is running a plan, I will only ever get askedthis - # if myplan doesn't explain the stop, and in that caseI don'teither. - return False - - def should_stop(self, event): - if self.step_thread_plan.IsPlanComplete(): - self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) - return True - else: - return False - - def should_step(self): - return False - -# Here's another example which does "step over" through the current function, -# and when it stops at each line, it checks some condition (in this example the -# value of a variable) and stops if that condition is true. - - -class StepCheckingCondition: - - def __init__(self, thread_plan, dict): - self.thread_plan = thread_plan - self.start_frame = thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0) - self.queue_next_plan() - - def queue_next_plan(self): - cur_frame = self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0) - cur_line_entry = cur_frame.GetLineEntry() - start_address = cur_line_entry.GetStartAddress() - end_address = cur_line_entry.GetEndAddress() - line_range = end_address.GetFileAddress() - start_address.GetFileAddress() - self.step_thread_plan = self.thread_plan.QueueThreadPlanForStepOverRange( - start_address, line_range) - - def explains_stop(self, event): - # We are stepping, so if we stop for any other reason, it isn't - # because of us. - return False - - def should_stop(self, event): - if not self.step_thread_plan.IsPlanComplete(): - return False - - frame = self.thread_plan.GetThread().GetFrameAtIndex(0) - if not self.start_frame.IsEqual(frame): - self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) - return True - - # This part checks the condition. In this case we are expecting - # some integer variable called "a", and will stop when it is 20. - a_var = frame.FindVariable("a") - - if not a_var.IsValid(): - print "A was not valid." - return True - - error = lldb.SBError() - a_value = a_var.GetValueAsSigned(error) - if not error.Success(): - print "A value was not good." - return True - - if a_value == 20: - self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) - return True - else: - self.queue_next_plan() - return False - - def should_step(self): - return True - -# Here's an example that steps out of the current frame, gathers some information -# and then continues. The information in this case is rax. Currently the thread -# plans are not a safe place to call lldb command-line commands, so the information -# is gathered through SB API calls. - - -class FinishPrintAndContinue: - - def __init__(self, thread_plan, dict): - self.thread_plan = thread_plan - self.step_out_thread_plan = thread_plan.QueueThreadPlanForStepOut( - 0, True) - self.thread = self.thread_plan.GetThread() - - def is_stale(self): - if self.step_out_thread_plan.IsPlanStale(): - self.do_print() - return True - else: - return False - - def explains_stop(self, event): - return False - - def should_stop(self, event): - if self.step_out_thread_plan.IsPlanComplete(): - self.do_print() - self.thread_plan.SetPlanComplete(True) - return False - - def do_print(self): - frame_0 = self.thread.frames[0] - rax_value = frame_0.FindRegister("rax") - if rax_value.GetError().Success(): - print "RAX on exit: ", rax_value.GetValue() - else: - print "Couldn't get rax value:", rax_value.GetError().GetCString() |