summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp405
1 files changed, 303 insertions, 102 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
index d46eb896e549..9c1dba355b48 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
@@ -21,17 +21,24 @@
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineMemOperand.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/PseudoSourceValue.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterPressure.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCInstrItineraries.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
using namespace llvm;
+static cl::opt<bool> EnableAASchedMI("enable-aa-sched-mi", cl::Hidden,
+ cl::ZeroOrMore, cl::init(false),
+ cl::desc("Enable use of AA during MI GAD construction"));
+
ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf,
const MachineLoopInfo &mli,
const MachineDominatorTree &mdt,
@@ -40,7 +47,7 @@ ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf,
: ScheduleDAG(mf), MLI(mli), MDT(mdt), MFI(mf.getFrameInfo()),
InstrItins(mf.getTarget().getInstrItineraryData()), LIS(lis),
IsPostRA(IsPostRAFlag), UnitLatencies(false), CanHandleTerminators(false),
- LoopRegs(MLI, MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) {
+ LoopRegs(MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) {
assert((IsPostRA || LIS) && "PreRA scheduling requires LiveIntervals");
DbgValues.clear();
assert(!(IsPostRA && MRI.getNumVirtRegs()) &&
@@ -126,7 +133,8 @@ static const Value *getUnderlyingObjectForInstr(const MachineInstr *MI,
return 0;
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *BB) {
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *bb) {
+ BB = bb;
LoopRegs.Deps.clear();
if (MachineLoop *ML = MLI.getLoopFor(BB))
if (BB == ML->getLoopLatch())
@@ -134,7 +142,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *BB) {
}
void ScheduleDAGInstrs::finishBlock() {
- // Nothing to do.
+ // Subclasses should no longer refer to the old block.
+ BB = 0;
}
/// Initialize the map with the number of registers.
@@ -159,7 +168,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::enterRegion(MachineBasicBlock *bb,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator begin,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator end,
unsigned endcount) {
- BB = bb;
+ assert(bb == BB && "startBlock should set BB");
RegionBegin = begin;
RegionEnd = end;
EndIndex = endcount;
@@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDataDeps(SUnit *SU,
unsigned SpecialAddressLatency = ST.getSpecialAddressLatency();
unsigned DataLatency = SU->Latency;
- for (const uint16_t *Alias = TRI->getOverlaps(MO.getReg()); *Alias; ++Alias) {
+ for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true);
+ Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) {
if (!Uses.contains(*Alias))
continue;
std::vector<SUnit*> &UseList = Uses[*Alias];
@@ -261,10 +271,12 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDataDeps(SUnit *SU,
// Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use
// information (if any), and then allow the target to
// perform its own adjustments.
- const SDep& dep = SDep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, *Alias);
+ SDep dep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, *Alias);
if (!UnitLatencies) {
- computeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
- ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
+ unsigned Latency = computeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, dep);
+ dep.setLatency(Latency);
+
+ ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, dep);
}
UseSU->addPred(dep);
}
@@ -285,7 +297,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
// TODO: Using a latency of 1 here for output dependencies assumes
// there's no cost for reusing registers.
SDep::Kind Kind = MO.isUse() ? SDep::Anti : SDep::Output;
- for (const uint16_t *Alias = TRI->getOverlaps(MO.getReg()); *Alias; ++Alias) {
+ for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true);
+ Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) {
if (!Defs.contains(*Alias))
continue;
std::vector<SUnit *> &DefList = Defs[*Alias];
@@ -398,9 +411,10 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegDefDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
const MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr();
unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(OperIdx).getReg();
- // SSA defs do not have output/anti dependencies.
+ // Singly defined vregs do not have output/anti dependencies.
// The current operand is a def, so we have at least one.
- if (llvm::next(MRI.def_begin(Reg)) == MRI.def_end())
+ // Check here if there are any others...
+ if (MRI.hasOneDef(Reg))
return;
// Add output dependence to the next nearest def of this vreg.
@@ -410,7 +424,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegDefDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
// uses. We're conservative for now until we have a way to guarantee the uses
// are not eliminated sometime during scheduling. The output dependence edge
// is also useful if output latency exceeds def-use latency.
- VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = findVRegDef(Reg);
+ VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg);
if (DefI == VRegDefs.end())
VRegDefs.insert(VReg2SUnit(Reg, SU));
else {
@@ -436,10 +450,11 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
// Lookup this operand's reaching definition.
assert(LIS && "vreg dependencies requires LiveIntervals");
- SlotIndex UseIdx = LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI).getRegSlot();
- LiveInterval *LI = &LIS->getInterval(Reg);
- VNInfo *VNI = LI->getVNInfoBefore(UseIdx);
+ LiveRangeQuery LRQ(LIS->getInterval(Reg), LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI));
+ VNInfo *VNI = LRQ.valueIn();
+
// VNI will be valid because MachineOperand::readsReg() is checked by caller.
+ assert(VNI && "No value to read by operand");
MachineInstr *Def = LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(VNI->def);
// Phis and other noninstructions (after coalescing) have a NULL Def.
if (Def) {
@@ -449,11 +464,13 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
// Create a data dependence.
//
// TODO: Handle "special" address latencies cleanly.
- const SDep &dep = SDep(DefSU, SDep::Data, DefSU->Latency, Reg);
+ SDep dep(DefSU, SDep::Data, DefSU->Latency, Reg);
if (!UnitLatencies) {
// Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use information, then
// allow the target to perform its own adjustments.
- computeOperandLatency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
+ unsigned Latency = computeOperandLatency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
+ dep.setLatency(Latency);
+
const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>();
ST.adjustSchedDependency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep));
}
@@ -462,11 +479,217 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) {
}
// Add antidependence to the following def of the vreg it uses.
- VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = findVRegDef(Reg);
+ VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg);
if (DefI != VRegDefs.end() && DefI->SU != SU)
DefI->SU->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Anti, 0, Reg));
}
+/// Return true if MI is an instruction we are unable to reason about
+/// (like a call or something with unmodeled side effects).
+static inline bool isGlobalMemoryObject(AliasAnalysis *AA, MachineInstr *MI) {
+ if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
+ (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() &&
+ (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA))))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+// This MI might have either incomplete info, or known to be unsafe
+// to deal with (i.e. volatile object).
+static inline bool isUnsafeMemoryObject(MachineInstr *MI,
+ const MachineFrameInfo *MFI) {
+ if (!MI || MI->memoperands_empty())
+ return true;
+ // We purposefully do no check for hasOneMemOperand() here
+ // in hope to trigger an assert downstream in order to
+ // finish implementation.
+ if ((*MI->memoperands_begin())->isVolatile() ||
+ MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects())
+ return true;
+
+ const Value *V = (*MI->memoperands_begin())->getValue();
+ if (!V)
+ return true;
+
+ V = getUnderlyingObject(V);
+ if (const PseudoSourceValue *PSV = dyn_cast<PseudoSourceValue>(V)) {
+ // Similarly to getUnderlyingObjectForInstr:
+ // For now, ignore PseudoSourceValues which may alias LLVM IR values
+ // because the code that uses this function has no way to cope with
+ // such aliases.
+ if (PSV->isAliased(MFI))
+ return true;
+ }
+ // Does this pointer refer to a distinct and identifiable object?
+ if (!isIdentifiedObject(V))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// This returns true if the two MIs need a chain edge betwee them.
+/// If these are not even memory operations, we still may need
+/// chain deps between them. The question really is - could
+/// these two MIs be reordered during scheduling from memory dependency
+/// point of view.
+static bool MIsNeedChainEdge(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ MachineInstr *MIa,
+ MachineInstr *MIb) {
+ // Cover a trivial case - no edge is need to itself.
+ if (MIa == MIb)
+ return false;
+
+ if (isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIa, MFI) || isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIb, MFI))
+ return true;
+
+ // If we are dealing with two "normal" loads, we do not need an edge
+ // between them - they could be reordered.
+ if (!MIa->mayStore() && !MIb->mayStore())
+ return false;
+
+ // To this point analysis is generic. From here on we do need AA.
+ if (!AA)
+ return true;
+
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOa = *MIa->memoperands_begin();
+ MachineMemOperand *MMOb = *MIb->memoperands_begin();
+
+ // FIXME: Need to handle multiple memory operands to support all targets.
+ if (!MIa->hasOneMemOperand() || !MIb->hasOneMemOperand())
+ llvm_unreachable("Multiple memory operands.");
+
+ // The following interface to AA is fashioned after DAGCombiner::isAlias
+ // and operates with MachineMemOperand offset with some important
+ // assumptions:
+ // - LLVM fundamentally assumes flat address spaces.
+ // - MachineOperand offset can *only* result from legalization and
+ // cannot affect queries other than the trivial case of overlap
+ // checking.
+ // - These offsets never wrap and never step outside
+ // of allocated objects.
+ // - There should never be any negative offsets here.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Modify API to hide this math from "user"
+ // FIXME: Even before we go to AA we can reason locally about some
+ // memory objects. It can save compile time, and possibly catch some
+ // corner cases not currently covered.
+
+ assert ((MMOa->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+ assert ((MMOb->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset");
+
+ int64_t MinOffset = std::min(MMOa->getOffset(), MMOb->getOffset());
+ int64_t Overlapa = MMOa->getSize() + MMOa->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+ int64_t Overlapb = MMOb->getSize() + MMOb->getOffset() - MinOffset;
+
+ AliasAnalysis::AliasResult AAResult = AA->alias(
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOa->getValue(), Overlapa,
+ MMOa->getTBAAInfo()),
+ AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOb->getValue(), Overlapb,
+ MMOb->getTBAAInfo()));
+
+ return (AAResult != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias);
+}
+
+/// This recursive function iterates over chain deps of SUb looking for
+/// "latest" node that needs a chain edge to SUa.
+static unsigned
+iterateChainSucc(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb, SUnit *ExitSU, unsigned *Depth,
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> &Visited) {
+ if (!SUa || !SUb || SUb == ExitSU)
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // Remember visited nodes.
+ if (!Visited.insert(SUb))
+ return *Depth;
+ // If there is _some_ dependency already in place, do not
+ // descend any further.
+ // TODO: Need to make sure that if that dependency got eliminated or ignored
+ // for any reason in the future, we would not violate DAG topology.
+ // Currently it does not happen, but makes an implicit assumption about
+ // future implementation.
+ //
+ // Independently, if we encounter node that is some sort of global
+ // object (like a call) we already have full set of dependencies to it
+ // and we can stop descending.
+ if (SUa->isSucc(SUb) ||
+ isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, SUb->getInstr()))
+ return *Depth;
+
+ // If we do need an edge, or we have exceeded depth budget,
+ // add that edge to the predecessors chain of SUb,
+ // and stop descending.
+ if (*Depth > 200 ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr())) {
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ return *Depth;
+ }
+ // Track current depth.
+ (*Depth)++;
+ // Iterate over chain dependencies only.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator I = SUb->Succs.begin(), E = SUb->Succs.end();
+ I != E; ++I)
+ if (I->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SUa, I->getSUnit(), ExitSU, Depth, Visited);
+ return *Depth;
+}
+
+/// This function assumes that "downward" from SU there exist
+/// tail/leaf of already constructed DAG. It iterates downward and
+/// checks whether SU can be aliasing any node dominated
+/// by it.
+static void adjustChainDeps(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SU, SUnit *ExitSU, std::set<SUnit *> &CheckList,
+ unsigned LatencyToLoad) {
+ if (!SU)
+ return;
+
+ SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> Visited;
+ unsigned Depth = 0;
+
+ for (std::set<SUnit *>::iterator I = CheckList.begin(), IE = CheckList.end();
+ I != IE; ++I) {
+ if (SU == *I)
+ continue;
+ if (MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SU->getInstr(), (*I)->getInstr())) {
+ unsigned Latency = ((*I)->getInstr()->mayLoad()) ? LatencyToLoad : 0;
+ (*I)->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, Latency, /*Reg=*/0,
+ /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ }
+ // Now go through all the chain successors and iterate from them.
+ // Keep track of visited nodes.
+ for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator J = (*I)->Succs.begin(),
+ JE = (*I)->Succs.end(); J != JE; ++J)
+ if (J->isCtrl())
+ iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SU, J->getSUnit(),
+ ExitSU, &Depth, Visited);
+ }
+}
+
+/// Check whether two objects need a chain edge, if so, add it
+/// otherwise remember the rejected SU.
+static inline
+void addChainDependency (AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI,
+ SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb,
+ std::set<SUnit *> &RejectList,
+ unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0,
+ bool isNormalMemory = false) {
+ // If this is a false dependency,
+ // do not add the edge, but rememeber the rejected node.
+ if (!EnableAASchedMI ||
+ MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr()))
+ SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency, /*Reg=*/0,
+ isNormalMemory));
+ else {
+ // Duplicate entries should be ignored.
+ RejectList.insert(SUb);
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tReject chain dep between SU("
+ << SUa->NodeNum << ") and SU("
+ << SUb->NodeNum << ")\n");
+ }
+}
+
/// Create an SUnit for each real instruction, numbered in top-down toplological
/// order. The instruction order A < B, implies that no edge exists from B to A.
///
@@ -502,7 +725,11 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::initSUnits() {
}
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
+/// If RegPressure is non null, compute register pressure as a side effect. The
+/// DAG builder is an efficient place to do it because it already visits
+/// operands.
+void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA,
+ RegPressureTracker *RPTracker) {
// Create an SUnit for each real instruction.
initSUnits();
@@ -518,6 +745,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
// that are known not to alias
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *> AliasMemDefs, NonAliasMemDefs;
std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> > AliasMemUses, NonAliasMemUses;
+ std::set<SUnit*> RejectMemNodes;
// Remove any stale debug info; sometimes BuildSchedGraph is called again
// without emitting the info from the previous call.
@@ -553,6 +781,10 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
PrevMI = MI;
continue;
}
+ if (RPTracker) {
+ RPTracker->recede();
+ assert(RPTracker->getPos() == prior(MII) && "RPTracker can't find MI");
+ }
assert((!MI->isTerminator() || CanHandleTerminators) && !MI->isLabel() &&
"Cannot schedule terminators or labels!");
@@ -587,11 +819,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
// after stack slots are lowered to actual addresses.
// TODO: Use an AliasAnalysis and do real alias-analysis queries, and
// produce more precise dependence information.
-#define STORE_LOAD_LATENCY 1
- unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0;
- if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() ||
- (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() &&
- (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)))) {
+ unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = MI->mayStore() ? 1 : 0;
+ if (isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, MI)) {
// Be conservative with these and add dependencies on all memory
// references, even those that are known to not alias.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
@@ -603,36 +832,48 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
}
- NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
- NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// Add SU to the barrier chain.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
BarrierChain = SU;
+ // This is a barrier event that acts as a pivotal node in the DAG,
+ // so it is safe to clear list of exposed nodes.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
+ RejectMemNodes.clear();
+ NonAliasMemDefs.clear();
+ NonAliasMemUses.clear();
// fall-through
new_alias_chain:
// Chain all possibly aliasing memory references though SU.
- if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ if (AliasChain) {
+ unsigned ChainLatency = 0;
+ if (AliasChain->getInstr()->mayLoad())
+ ChainLatency = TrueMemOrderLatency;
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes,
+ ChainLatency);
+ }
AliasChain = SU;
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = AliasMemDefs.begin(),
- E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
- }
+ E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
for (std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> >::iterator I =
AliasMemUses.begin(), E = AliasMemUses.end(); I != E; ++I) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
}
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
PendingLoads.clear();
AliasMemDefs.clear();
AliasMemUses.clear();
} else if (MI->mayStore()) {
bool MayAlias = true;
- TrueMemOrderLatency = STORE_LOAD_LATENCY;
if (const Value *V = getUnderlyingObjectForInstr(MI, MFI, MayAlias)) {
// A store to a specific PseudoSourceValue. Add precise dependencies.
// Record the def in MemDefs, first adding a dep if there is
@@ -642,8 +883,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE) {
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes,
+ 0, true);
I->second = SU;
} else {
if (MayAlias)
@@ -658,20 +899,28 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemUses.end() : NonAliasMemUses.end());
if (J != JE) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = J->second.size(); i != e; ++i)
- J->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency,
- /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, J->second[i], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency, true);
J->second.clear();
}
if (MayAlias) {
// Add dependencies from all the PendingLoads, i.e. loads
// with no underlying object.
for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k)
- PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
// Add dependence on alias chain, if needed.
if (AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
+ // But we also should check dependent instructions for the
+ // SU in question.
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes,
+ TrueMemOrderLatency);
}
// Add dependence on barrier chain, if needed.
+ // There is no point to check aliasing on barrier event. Even if
+ // SU and barrier _could_ be reordered, they should not. In addition,
+ // we have lost all RejectMemNodes below barrier.
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
} else {
@@ -688,7 +937,6 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
/*isArtificial=*/true));
} else if (MI->mayLoad()) {
bool MayAlias = true;
- TrueMemOrderLatency = 0;
if (MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)) {
// Invariant load, no chain dependencies needed!
} else {
@@ -700,8 +948,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE =
((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end());
if (I != IE)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0,
- /*isNormalMemory=*/true));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes, 0, true);
if (MayAlias)
AliasMemUses[V].push_back(SU);
else
@@ -711,15 +958,16 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
// potentially aliasing stores.
for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I =
AliasMemDefs.begin(), E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I)
- I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes);
PendingLoads.push_back(SU);
MayAlias = true;
}
-
+ if (MayAlias)
+ adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, /*Latency=*/0);
// Add dependencies on alias and barrier chains, if needed.
if (MayAlias && AliasChain)
- AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
+ addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes);
if (BarrierChain)
BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0));
}
@@ -735,8 +983,9 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) {
}
void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
- // Compute the latency for the node.
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) {
+ // Compute the latency for the node. We only provide a default for missing
+ // itineraries. Empty itineraries still have latency properties.
+ if (!InstrItins) {
SU->Latency = 1;
// Simplistic target-independent heuristic: assume that loads take
@@ -748,63 +997,15 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeLatency(SUnit *SU) {
}
}
-void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeOperandLatency(SUnit *Def, SUnit *Use,
- SDep& dep) const {
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty())
- return;
-
+unsigned ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeOperandLatency(SUnit *Def, SUnit *Use,
+ const SDep& dep,
+ bool FindMin) const {
// For a data dependency with a known register...
if ((dep.getKind() != SDep::Data) || (dep.getReg() == 0))
- return;
-
- const unsigned Reg = dep.getReg();
-
- // ... find the definition of the register in the defining
- // instruction
- MachineInstr *DefMI = Def->getInstr();
- int DefIdx = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg);
- if (DefIdx != -1) {
- const MachineOperand &MO = DefMI->getOperand(DefIdx);
- if (MO.isReg() && MO.isImplicit() &&
- DefIdx >= (int)DefMI->getDesc().getNumOperands()) {
- // This is an implicit def, getOperandLatency() won't return the correct
- // latency. e.g.
- // %D6<def>, %D7<def> = VLD1q16 %R2<kill>, 0, ..., %Q3<imp-def>
- // %Q1<def> = VMULv8i16 %Q1<kill>, %Q3<kill>, ...
- // What we want is to compute latency between def of %D6/%D7 and use of
- // %Q3 instead.
- unsigned Op2 = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg, false, true, TRI);
- if (DefMI->getOperand(Op2).isReg())
- DefIdx = Op2;
- }
- MachineInstr *UseMI = Use->getInstr();
- // For all uses of the register, calculate the maxmimum latency
- int Latency = -1;
- if (UseMI) {
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseMI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
- const MachineOperand &MO = UseMI->getOperand(i);
- if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse())
- continue;
- unsigned MOReg = MO.getReg();
- if (MOReg != Reg)
- continue;
-
- int UseCycle = TII->getOperandLatency(InstrItins, DefMI, DefIdx,
- UseMI, i);
- Latency = std::max(Latency, UseCycle);
- }
- } else {
- // UseMI is null, then it must be a scheduling barrier.
- if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty())
- return;
- unsigned DefClass = DefMI->getDesc().getSchedClass();
- Latency = InstrItins->getOperandCycle(DefClass, DefIdx);
- }
+ return 1;
- // If we found a latency, then replace the existing dependence latency.
- if (Latency >= 0)
- dep.setLatency(Latency);
- }
+ return TII->computeOperandLatency(InstrItins, TRI, Def->getInstr(),
+ Use->getInstr(), dep.getReg(), FindMin);
}
void ScheduleDAGInstrs::dumpNode(const SUnit *SU) const {