diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp | 405 |
1 files changed, 303 insertions, 102 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp index d46eb896e549..9c1dba355b48 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp @@ -21,17 +21,24 @@ #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineMemOperand.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/PseudoSourceValue.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterPressure.h" #include "llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.h" #include "llvm/MC/MCInstrItineraries.h" #include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h" #include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h" #include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h" #include "llvm/Target/TargetSubtargetInfo.h" +#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" #include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h" using namespace llvm; +static cl::opt<bool> EnableAASchedMI("enable-aa-sched-mi", cl::Hidden, + cl::ZeroOrMore, cl::init(false), + cl::desc("Enable use of AA during MI GAD construction")); + ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf, const MachineLoopInfo &mli, const MachineDominatorTree &mdt, @@ -40,7 +47,7 @@ ScheduleDAGInstrs::ScheduleDAGInstrs(MachineFunction &mf, : ScheduleDAG(mf), MLI(mli), MDT(mdt), MFI(mf.getFrameInfo()), InstrItins(mf.getTarget().getInstrItineraryData()), LIS(lis), IsPostRA(IsPostRAFlag), UnitLatencies(false), CanHandleTerminators(false), - LoopRegs(MLI, MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) { + LoopRegs(MDT), FirstDbgValue(0) { assert((IsPostRA || LIS) && "PreRA scheduling requires LiveIntervals"); DbgValues.clear(); assert(!(IsPostRA && MRI.getNumVirtRegs()) && @@ -126,7 +133,8 @@ static const Value *getUnderlyingObjectForInstr(const MachineInstr *MI, return 0; } -void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *BB) { +void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *bb) { + BB = bb; LoopRegs.Deps.clear(); if (MachineLoop *ML = MLI.getLoopFor(BB)) if (BB == ML->getLoopLatch()) @@ -134,7 +142,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::startBlock(MachineBasicBlock *BB) { } void ScheduleDAGInstrs::finishBlock() { - // Nothing to do. + // Subclasses should no longer refer to the old block. + BB = 0; } /// Initialize the map with the number of registers. @@ -159,7 +168,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::enterRegion(MachineBasicBlock *bb, MachineBasicBlock::iterator begin, MachineBasicBlock::iterator end, unsigned endcount) { - BB = bb; + assert(bb == BB && "startBlock should set BB"); RegionBegin = begin; RegionEnd = end; EndIndex = endcount; @@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDataDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned SpecialAddressLatency = ST.getSpecialAddressLatency(); unsigned DataLatency = SU->Latency; - for (const uint16_t *Alias = TRI->getOverlaps(MO.getReg()); *Alias; ++Alias) { + for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true); + Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) { if (!Uses.contains(*Alias)) continue; std::vector<SUnit*> &UseList = Uses[*Alias]; @@ -261,10 +271,12 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDataDeps(SUnit *SU, // Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use // information (if any), and then allow the target to // perform its own adjustments. - const SDep& dep = SDep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, *Alias); + SDep dep(SU, SDep::Data, LDataLatency, *Alias); if (!UnitLatencies) { - computeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep)); - ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep)); + unsigned Latency = computeOperandLatency(SU, UseSU, dep); + dep.setLatency(Latency); + + ST.adjustSchedDependency(SU, UseSU, dep); } UseSU->addPred(dep); } @@ -285,7 +297,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addPhysRegDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { // TODO: Using a latency of 1 here for output dependencies assumes // there's no cost for reusing registers. SDep::Kind Kind = MO.isUse() ? SDep::Anti : SDep::Output; - for (const uint16_t *Alias = TRI->getOverlaps(MO.getReg()); *Alias; ++Alias) { + for (MCRegAliasIterator Alias(MO.getReg(), TRI, true); + Alias.isValid(); ++Alias) { if (!Defs.contains(*Alias)) continue; std::vector<SUnit *> &DefList = Defs[*Alias]; @@ -398,9 +411,10 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegDefDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { const MachineInstr *MI = SU->getInstr(); unsigned Reg = MI->getOperand(OperIdx).getReg(); - // SSA defs do not have output/anti dependencies. + // Singly defined vregs do not have output/anti dependencies. // The current operand is a def, so we have at least one. - if (llvm::next(MRI.def_begin(Reg)) == MRI.def_end()) + // Check here if there are any others... + if (MRI.hasOneDef(Reg)) return; // Add output dependence to the next nearest def of this vreg. @@ -410,7 +424,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegDefDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { // uses. We're conservative for now until we have a way to guarantee the uses // are not eliminated sometime during scheduling. The output dependence edge // is also useful if output latency exceeds def-use latency. - VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = findVRegDef(Reg); + VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg); if (DefI == VRegDefs.end()) VRegDefs.insert(VReg2SUnit(Reg, SU)); else { @@ -436,10 +450,11 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { // Lookup this operand's reaching definition. assert(LIS && "vreg dependencies requires LiveIntervals"); - SlotIndex UseIdx = LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI).getRegSlot(); - LiveInterval *LI = &LIS->getInterval(Reg); - VNInfo *VNI = LI->getVNInfoBefore(UseIdx); + LiveRangeQuery LRQ(LIS->getInterval(Reg), LIS->getInstructionIndex(MI)); + VNInfo *VNI = LRQ.valueIn(); + // VNI will be valid because MachineOperand::readsReg() is checked by caller. + assert(VNI && "No value to read by operand"); MachineInstr *Def = LIS->getInstructionFromIndex(VNI->def); // Phis and other noninstructions (after coalescing) have a NULL Def. if (Def) { @@ -449,11 +464,13 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { // Create a data dependence. // // TODO: Handle "special" address latencies cleanly. - const SDep &dep = SDep(DefSU, SDep::Data, DefSU->Latency, Reg); + SDep dep(DefSU, SDep::Data, DefSU->Latency, Reg); if (!UnitLatencies) { // Adjust the dependence latency using operand def/use information, then // allow the target to perform its own adjustments. - computeOperandLatency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep)); + unsigned Latency = computeOperandLatency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep)); + dep.setLatency(Latency); + const TargetSubtargetInfo &ST = TM.getSubtarget<TargetSubtargetInfo>(); ST.adjustSchedDependency(DefSU, SU, const_cast<SDep &>(dep)); } @@ -462,11 +479,217 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::addVRegUseDeps(SUnit *SU, unsigned OperIdx) { } // Add antidependence to the following def of the vreg it uses. - VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = findVRegDef(Reg); + VReg2SUnitMap::iterator DefI = VRegDefs.find(Reg); if (DefI != VRegDefs.end() && DefI->SU != SU) DefI->SU->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Anti, 0, Reg)); } +/// Return true if MI is an instruction we are unable to reason about +/// (like a call or something with unmodeled side effects). +static inline bool isGlobalMemoryObject(AliasAnalysis *AA, MachineInstr *MI) { + if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() || + (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() && + (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)))) + return true; + return false; +} + +// This MI might have either incomplete info, or known to be unsafe +// to deal with (i.e. volatile object). +static inline bool isUnsafeMemoryObject(MachineInstr *MI, + const MachineFrameInfo *MFI) { + if (!MI || MI->memoperands_empty()) + return true; + // We purposefully do no check for hasOneMemOperand() here + // in hope to trigger an assert downstream in order to + // finish implementation. + if ((*MI->memoperands_begin())->isVolatile() || + MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects()) + return true; + + const Value *V = (*MI->memoperands_begin())->getValue(); + if (!V) + return true; + + V = getUnderlyingObject(V); + if (const PseudoSourceValue *PSV = dyn_cast<PseudoSourceValue>(V)) { + // Similarly to getUnderlyingObjectForInstr: + // For now, ignore PseudoSourceValues which may alias LLVM IR values + // because the code that uses this function has no way to cope with + // such aliases. + if (PSV->isAliased(MFI)) + return true; + } + // Does this pointer refer to a distinct and identifiable object? + if (!isIdentifiedObject(V)) + return true; + + return false; +} + +/// This returns true if the two MIs need a chain edge betwee them. +/// If these are not even memory operations, we still may need +/// chain deps between them. The question really is - could +/// these two MIs be reordered during scheduling from memory dependency +/// point of view. +static bool MIsNeedChainEdge(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI, + MachineInstr *MIa, + MachineInstr *MIb) { + // Cover a trivial case - no edge is need to itself. + if (MIa == MIb) + return false; + + if (isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIa, MFI) || isUnsafeMemoryObject(MIb, MFI)) + return true; + + // If we are dealing with two "normal" loads, we do not need an edge + // between them - they could be reordered. + if (!MIa->mayStore() && !MIb->mayStore()) + return false; + + // To this point analysis is generic. From here on we do need AA. + if (!AA) + return true; + + MachineMemOperand *MMOa = *MIa->memoperands_begin(); + MachineMemOperand *MMOb = *MIb->memoperands_begin(); + + // FIXME: Need to handle multiple memory operands to support all targets. + if (!MIa->hasOneMemOperand() || !MIb->hasOneMemOperand()) + llvm_unreachable("Multiple memory operands."); + + // The following interface to AA is fashioned after DAGCombiner::isAlias + // and operates with MachineMemOperand offset with some important + // assumptions: + // - LLVM fundamentally assumes flat address spaces. + // - MachineOperand offset can *only* result from legalization and + // cannot affect queries other than the trivial case of overlap + // checking. + // - These offsets never wrap and never step outside + // of allocated objects. + // - There should never be any negative offsets here. + // + // FIXME: Modify API to hide this math from "user" + // FIXME: Even before we go to AA we can reason locally about some + // memory objects. It can save compile time, and possibly catch some + // corner cases not currently covered. + + assert ((MMOa->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset"); + assert ((MMOb->getOffset() >= 0) && "Negative MachineMemOperand offset"); + + int64_t MinOffset = std::min(MMOa->getOffset(), MMOb->getOffset()); + int64_t Overlapa = MMOa->getSize() + MMOa->getOffset() - MinOffset; + int64_t Overlapb = MMOb->getSize() + MMOb->getOffset() - MinOffset; + + AliasAnalysis::AliasResult AAResult = AA->alias( + AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOa->getValue(), Overlapa, + MMOa->getTBAAInfo()), + AliasAnalysis::Location(MMOb->getValue(), Overlapb, + MMOb->getTBAAInfo())); + + return (AAResult != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias); +} + +/// This recursive function iterates over chain deps of SUb looking for +/// "latest" node that needs a chain edge to SUa. +static unsigned +iterateChainSucc(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI, + SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb, SUnit *ExitSU, unsigned *Depth, + SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> &Visited) { + if (!SUa || !SUb || SUb == ExitSU) + return *Depth; + + // Remember visited nodes. + if (!Visited.insert(SUb)) + return *Depth; + // If there is _some_ dependency already in place, do not + // descend any further. + // TODO: Need to make sure that if that dependency got eliminated or ignored + // for any reason in the future, we would not violate DAG topology. + // Currently it does not happen, but makes an implicit assumption about + // future implementation. + // + // Independently, if we encounter node that is some sort of global + // object (like a call) we already have full set of dependencies to it + // and we can stop descending. + if (SUa->isSucc(SUb) || + isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, SUb->getInstr())) + return *Depth; + + // If we do need an edge, or we have exceeded depth budget, + // add that edge to the predecessors chain of SUb, + // and stop descending. + if (*Depth > 200 || + MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr())) { + SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0, + /*isNormalMemory=*/true)); + return *Depth; + } + // Track current depth. + (*Depth)++; + // Iterate over chain dependencies only. + for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator I = SUb->Succs.begin(), E = SUb->Succs.end(); + I != E; ++I) + if (I->isCtrl()) + iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SUa, I->getSUnit(), ExitSU, Depth, Visited); + return *Depth; +} + +/// This function assumes that "downward" from SU there exist +/// tail/leaf of already constructed DAG. It iterates downward and +/// checks whether SU can be aliasing any node dominated +/// by it. +static void adjustChainDeps(AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI, + SUnit *SU, SUnit *ExitSU, std::set<SUnit *> &CheckList, + unsigned LatencyToLoad) { + if (!SU) + return; + + SmallPtrSet<const SUnit*, 16> Visited; + unsigned Depth = 0; + + for (std::set<SUnit *>::iterator I = CheckList.begin(), IE = CheckList.end(); + I != IE; ++I) { + if (SU == *I) + continue; + if (MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SU->getInstr(), (*I)->getInstr())) { + unsigned Latency = ((*I)->getInstr()->mayLoad()) ? LatencyToLoad : 0; + (*I)->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, Latency, /*Reg=*/0, + /*isNormalMemory=*/true)); + } + // Now go through all the chain successors and iterate from them. + // Keep track of visited nodes. + for (SUnit::const_succ_iterator J = (*I)->Succs.begin(), + JE = (*I)->Succs.end(); J != JE; ++J) + if (J->isCtrl()) + iterateChainSucc (AA, MFI, SU, J->getSUnit(), + ExitSU, &Depth, Visited); + } +} + +/// Check whether two objects need a chain edge, if so, add it +/// otherwise remember the rejected SU. +static inline +void addChainDependency (AliasAnalysis *AA, const MachineFrameInfo *MFI, + SUnit *SUa, SUnit *SUb, + std::set<SUnit *> &RejectList, + unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0, + bool isNormalMemory = false) { + // If this is a false dependency, + // do not add the edge, but rememeber the rejected node. + if (!EnableAASchedMI || + MIsNeedChainEdge(AA, MFI, SUa->getInstr(), SUb->getInstr())) + SUb->addPred(SDep(SUa, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency, /*Reg=*/0, + isNormalMemory)); + else { + // Duplicate entries should be ignored. + RejectList.insert(SUb); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tReject chain dep between SU(" + << SUa->NodeNum << ") and SU(" + << SUb->NodeNum << ")\n"); + } +} + /// Create an SUnit for each real instruction, numbered in top-down toplological /// order. The instruction order A < B, implies that no edge exists from B to A. /// @@ -502,7 +725,11 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::initSUnits() { } } -void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { +/// If RegPressure is non null, compute register pressure as a side effect. The +/// DAG builder is an efficient place to do it because it already visits +/// operands. +void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA, + RegPressureTracker *RPTracker) { // Create an SUnit for each real instruction. initSUnits(); @@ -518,6 +745,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { // that are known not to alias std::map<const Value *, SUnit *> AliasMemDefs, NonAliasMemDefs; std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> > AliasMemUses, NonAliasMemUses; + std::set<SUnit*> RejectMemNodes; // Remove any stale debug info; sometimes BuildSchedGraph is called again // without emitting the info from the previous call. @@ -553,6 +781,10 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { PrevMI = MI; continue; } + if (RPTracker) { + RPTracker->recede(); + assert(RPTracker->getPos() == prior(MII) && "RPTracker can't find MI"); + } assert((!MI->isTerminator() || CanHandleTerminators) && !MI->isLabel() && "Cannot schedule terminators or labels!"); @@ -587,11 +819,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { // after stack slots are lowered to actual addresses. // TODO: Use an AliasAnalysis and do real alias-analysis queries, and // produce more precise dependence information. -#define STORE_LOAD_LATENCY 1 - unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = 0; - if (MI->isCall() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects() || - (MI->hasVolatileMemoryRef() && - (!MI->mayLoad() || !MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)))) { + unsigned TrueMemOrderLatency = MI->mayStore() ? 1 : 0; + if (isGlobalMemoryObject(AA, MI)) { // Be conservative with these and add dependencies on all memory // references, even those that are known to not alias. for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = @@ -603,36 +832,48 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i) I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency)); } - NonAliasMemDefs.clear(); - NonAliasMemUses.clear(); // Add SU to the barrier chain. if (BarrierChain) BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); BarrierChain = SU; + // This is a barrier event that acts as a pivotal node in the DAG, + // so it is safe to clear list of exposed nodes. + adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); + RejectMemNodes.clear(); + NonAliasMemDefs.clear(); + NonAliasMemUses.clear(); // fall-through new_alias_chain: // Chain all possibly aliasing memory references though SU. - if (AliasChain) - AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); + if (AliasChain) { + unsigned ChainLatency = 0; + if (AliasChain->getInstr()->mayLoad()) + ChainLatency = TrueMemOrderLatency; + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes, + ChainLatency); + } AliasChain = SU; for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k) - PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = AliasMemDefs.begin(), - E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) { - I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); - } + E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes); for (std::map<const Value *, std::vector<SUnit *> >::iterator I = AliasMemUses.begin(), E = AliasMemUses.end(); I != E; ++I) { for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->second.size(); i != e; ++i) - I->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second[i], RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); } + adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); PendingLoads.clear(); AliasMemDefs.clear(); AliasMemUses.clear(); } else if (MI->mayStore()) { bool MayAlias = true; - TrueMemOrderLatency = STORE_LOAD_LATENCY; if (const Value *V = getUnderlyingObjectForInstr(MI, MFI, MayAlias)) { // A store to a specific PseudoSourceValue. Add precise dependencies. // Record the def in MemDefs, first adding a dep if there is @@ -642,8 +883,8 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE = ((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end()); if (I != IE) { - I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0, - /*isNormalMemory=*/true)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes, + 0, true); I->second = SU; } else { if (MayAlias) @@ -658,20 +899,28 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { ((MayAlias) ? AliasMemUses.end() : NonAliasMemUses.end()); if (J != JE) { for (unsigned i = 0, e = J->second.size(); i != e; ++i) - J->second[i]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency, - /*Reg=*/0, /*isNormalMemory=*/true)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, J->second[i], RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency, true); J->second.clear(); } if (MayAlias) { // Add dependencies from all the PendingLoads, i.e. loads // with no underlying object. for (unsigned k = 0, m = PendingLoads.size(); k != m; ++k) - PendingLoads[k]->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, TrueMemOrderLatency)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, PendingLoads[k], RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); // Add dependence on alias chain, if needed. if (AliasChain) - AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes); + // But we also should check dependent instructions for the + // SU in question. + adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, + TrueMemOrderLatency); } // Add dependence on barrier chain, if needed. + // There is no point to check aliasing on barrier event. Even if + // SU and barrier _could_ be reordered, they should not. In addition, + // we have lost all RejectMemNodes below barrier. if (BarrierChain) BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); } else { @@ -688,7 +937,6 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { /*isArtificial=*/true)); } else if (MI->mayLoad()) { bool MayAlias = true; - TrueMemOrderLatency = 0; if (MI->isInvariantLoad(AA)) { // Invariant load, no chain dependencies needed! } else { @@ -700,8 +948,7 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator IE = ((MayAlias) ? AliasMemDefs.end() : NonAliasMemDefs.end()); if (I != IE) - I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0, /*Reg=*/0, - /*isNormalMemory=*/true)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes, 0, true); if (MayAlias) AliasMemUses[V].push_back(SU); else @@ -711,15 +958,16 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { // potentially aliasing stores. for (std::map<const Value *, SUnit *>::iterator I = AliasMemDefs.begin(), E = AliasMemDefs.end(); I != E; ++I) - I->second->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, I->second, RejectMemNodes); PendingLoads.push_back(SU); MayAlias = true; } - + if (MayAlias) + adjustChainDeps(AA, MFI, SU, &ExitSU, RejectMemNodes, /*Latency=*/0); // Add dependencies on alias and barrier chains, if needed. if (MayAlias && AliasChain) - AliasChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); + addChainDependency(AA, MFI, SU, AliasChain, RejectMemNodes); if (BarrierChain) BarrierChain->addPred(SDep(SU, SDep::Order, /*Latency=*/0)); } @@ -735,8 +983,9 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph(AliasAnalysis *AA) { } void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeLatency(SUnit *SU) { - // Compute the latency for the node. - if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) { + // Compute the latency for the node. We only provide a default for missing + // itineraries. Empty itineraries still have latency properties. + if (!InstrItins) { SU->Latency = 1; // Simplistic target-independent heuristic: assume that loads take @@ -748,63 +997,15 @@ void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeLatency(SUnit *SU) { } } -void ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeOperandLatency(SUnit *Def, SUnit *Use, - SDep& dep) const { - if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) - return; - +unsigned ScheduleDAGInstrs::computeOperandLatency(SUnit *Def, SUnit *Use, + const SDep& dep, + bool FindMin) const { // For a data dependency with a known register... if ((dep.getKind() != SDep::Data) || (dep.getReg() == 0)) - return; - - const unsigned Reg = dep.getReg(); - - // ... find the definition of the register in the defining - // instruction - MachineInstr *DefMI = Def->getInstr(); - int DefIdx = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg); - if (DefIdx != -1) { - const MachineOperand &MO = DefMI->getOperand(DefIdx); - if (MO.isReg() && MO.isImplicit() && - DefIdx >= (int)DefMI->getDesc().getNumOperands()) { - // This is an implicit def, getOperandLatency() won't return the correct - // latency. e.g. - // %D6<def>, %D7<def> = VLD1q16 %R2<kill>, 0, ..., %Q3<imp-def> - // %Q1<def> = VMULv8i16 %Q1<kill>, %Q3<kill>, ... - // What we want is to compute latency between def of %D6/%D7 and use of - // %Q3 instead. - unsigned Op2 = DefMI->findRegisterDefOperandIdx(Reg, false, true, TRI); - if (DefMI->getOperand(Op2).isReg()) - DefIdx = Op2; - } - MachineInstr *UseMI = Use->getInstr(); - // For all uses of the register, calculate the maxmimum latency - int Latency = -1; - if (UseMI) { - for (unsigned i = 0, e = UseMI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) { - const MachineOperand &MO = UseMI->getOperand(i); - if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse()) - continue; - unsigned MOReg = MO.getReg(); - if (MOReg != Reg) - continue; - - int UseCycle = TII->getOperandLatency(InstrItins, DefMI, DefIdx, - UseMI, i); - Latency = std::max(Latency, UseCycle); - } - } else { - // UseMI is null, then it must be a scheduling barrier. - if (!InstrItins || InstrItins->isEmpty()) - return; - unsigned DefClass = DefMI->getDesc().getSchedClass(); - Latency = InstrItins->getOperandCycle(DefClass, DefIdx); - } + return 1; - // If we found a latency, then replace the existing dependence latency. - if (Latency >= 0) - dep.setLatency(Latency); - } + return TII->computeOperandLatency(InstrItins, TRI, Def->getInstr(), + Use->getInstr(), dep.getReg(), FindMin); } void ScheduleDAGInstrs::dumpNode(const SUnit *SU) const { |