summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp196
1 files changed, 145 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 61b4df40964c..a479d1027533 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -455,6 +455,85 @@ void Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
}
}
+void Sema::diagnoseExprIntendedAsTemplateName(Scope *S, ExprResult TemplateName,
+ SourceLocation Less,
+ SourceLocation Greater) {
+ if (TemplateName.isInvalid())
+ return;
+
+ DeclarationNameInfo NameInfo;
+ CXXScopeSpec SS;
+ LookupNameKind LookupKind;
+
+ DeclContext *LookupCtx = nullptr;
+ NamedDecl *Found = nullptr;
+
+ // Figure out what name we looked up.
+ if (auto *ME = dyn_cast<MemberExpr>(TemplateName.get())) {
+ NameInfo = ME->getMemberNameInfo();
+ SS.Adopt(ME->getQualifierLoc());
+ LookupKind = LookupMemberName;
+ LookupCtx = ME->getBase()->getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ Found = ME->getMemberDecl();
+ } else {
+ auto *DRE = cast<DeclRefExpr>(TemplateName.get());
+ NameInfo = DRE->getNameInfo();
+ SS.Adopt(DRE->getQualifierLoc());
+ LookupKind = LookupOrdinaryName;
+ Found = DRE->getFoundDecl();
+ }
+
+ // Try to correct the name by looking for templates and C++ named casts.
+ struct TemplateCandidateFilter : CorrectionCandidateCallback {
+ TemplateCandidateFilter() {
+ WantTypeSpecifiers = false;
+ WantExpressionKeywords = false;
+ WantRemainingKeywords = false;
+ WantCXXNamedCasts = true;
+ };
+ bool ValidateCandidate(const TypoCorrection &Candidate) override {
+ if (auto *ND = Candidate.getCorrectionDecl())
+ return isAcceptableTemplateName(ND->getASTContext(), ND, true);
+ return Candidate.isKeyword();
+ }
+ };
+
+ DeclarationName Name = NameInfo.getName();
+ if (TypoCorrection Corrected =
+ CorrectTypo(NameInfo, LookupKind, S, &SS,
+ llvm::make_unique<TemplateCandidateFilter>(),
+ CTK_ErrorRecovery, LookupCtx)) {
+ auto *ND = Corrected.getFoundDecl();
+ if (ND)
+ ND = isAcceptableTemplateName(Context, ND,
+ /*AllowFunctionTemplates*/ true);
+ if (ND || Corrected.isKeyword()) {
+ if (LookupCtx) {
+ std::string CorrectedStr(Corrected.getAsString(getLangOpts()));
+ bool DroppedSpecifier = Corrected.WillReplaceSpecifier() &&
+ Name.getAsString() == CorrectedStr;
+ diagnoseTypo(Corrected,
+ PDiag(diag::err_non_template_in_member_template_id_suggest)
+ << Name << LookupCtx << DroppedSpecifier
+ << SS.getRange(), false);
+ } else {
+ diagnoseTypo(Corrected,
+ PDiag(diag::err_non_template_in_template_id_suggest)
+ << Name, false);
+ }
+ if (Found)
+ Diag(Found->getLocation(),
+ diag::note_non_template_in_template_id_found);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ Diag(NameInfo.getLoc(), diag::err_non_template_in_template_id)
+ << Name << SourceRange(Less, Greater);
+ if (Found)
+ Diag(Found->getLocation(), diag::note_non_template_in_template_id_found);
+}
+
/// ActOnDependentIdExpression - Handle a dependent id-expression that
/// was just parsed. This is only possible with an explicit scope
/// specifier naming a dependent type.
@@ -1251,8 +1330,8 @@ Sema::CheckClassTemplate(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK,
auto *Tmpl = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Hidden)->getDescribedClassTemplate();
assert(Tmpl && "original definition of a class template is not a "
"class template?");
- makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden, KWLoc);
- makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Tmpl, KWLoc);
+ makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden);
+ makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Tmpl);
return Def;
}
@@ -7352,7 +7431,7 @@ Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec,
NamedDecl *Hidden = nullptr;
if (Def && SkipBody && !hasVisibleDefinition(Def, &Hidden)) {
SkipBody->ShouldSkip = true;
- makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden, KWLoc);
+ makeMergedDefinitionVisible(Hidden);
// From here on out, treat this as just a redeclaration.
TUK = TUK_Declaration;
} else if (Def) {
@@ -7825,6 +7904,9 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(
// C++11 [dcl.constexpr]p1: An explicit specialization of a constexpr
// function can differ from the template declaration with respect to
// the constexpr specifier.
+ // FIXME: We need an update record for this AST mutation.
+ // FIXME: What if there are multiple such prior declarations (for instance,
+ // from different modules)?
Specialization->setConstexpr(FD->isConstexpr());
}
@@ -7872,9 +7954,11 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionTemplateSpecialization(
// flag to not-deleted, so that we can inherit that information from 'FD'.
if (Specialization->isDeleted() && !SpecInfo->isExplicitSpecialization() &&
!Specialization->getCanonicalDecl()->isReferenced()) {
+ // FIXME: This assert will not hold in the presence of modules.
assert(
Specialization->getCanonicalDecl() == Specialization &&
"This must be the only existing declaration of this specialization");
+ // FIXME: We need an update record for this AST mutation.
Specialization->setDeletedAsWritten(false);
}
SpecInfo->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
@@ -7987,8 +8071,11 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, LookupResult &Previous) {
return false;
}
- // If this is a friend, just bail out here before we start turning
- // things into explicit specializations.
+ // A member specialization in a friend declaration isn't really declaring
+ // an explicit specialization, just identifying a specific (possibly implicit)
+ // specialization. Don't change the template specialization kind.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Is this really valid? Other compilers reject.
if (Member->getFriendObjectKind() != Decl::FOK_None) {
// Preserve instantiation information.
if (InstantiatedFrom && isa<CXXMethodDecl>(Member)) {
@@ -8038,66 +8125,36 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, LookupResult &Previous) {
false))
return true;
- // Note that this is an explicit instantiation of a member.
- // the original declaration to note that it is an explicit specialization
- // (if it was previously an implicit instantiation). This latter step
- // makes bookkeeping easier.
- if (isa<FunctionDecl>(Member)) {
+ // Note that this member specialization is an "instantiation of" the
+ // corresponding member of the original template.
+ if (auto *MemberFunction = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(Member)) {
FunctionDecl *InstantiationFunction = cast<FunctionDecl>(Instantiation);
if (InstantiationFunction->getTemplateSpecializationKind() ==
TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
- InstantiationFunction->setTemplateSpecializationKind(
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- InstantiationFunction->setLocation(Member->getLocation());
// Explicit specializations of member functions of class templates do not
// inherit '=delete' from the member function they are specializing.
if (InstantiationFunction->isDeleted()) {
+ // FIXME: This assert will not hold in the presence of modules.
assert(InstantiationFunction->getCanonicalDecl() ==
InstantiationFunction);
+ // FIXME: We need an update record for this AST mutation.
InstantiationFunction->setDeletedAsWritten(false);
}
}
- cast<FunctionDecl>(Member)->setInstantiationOfMemberFunction(
- cast<CXXMethodDecl>(InstantiatedFrom),
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- MarkUnusedFileScopedDecl(InstantiationFunction);
- } else if (isa<VarDecl>(Member)) {
- VarDecl *InstantiationVar = cast<VarDecl>(Instantiation);
- if (InstantiationVar->getTemplateSpecializationKind() ==
- TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
- InstantiationVar->setTemplateSpecializationKind(
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- InstantiationVar->setLocation(Member->getLocation());
- }
-
- cast<VarDecl>(Member)->setInstantiationOfStaticDataMember(
+ MemberFunction->setInstantiationOfMemberFunction(
+ cast<CXXMethodDecl>(InstantiatedFrom), TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
+ } else if (auto *MemberVar = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Member)) {
+ MemberVar->setInstantiationOfStaticDataMember(
cast<VarDecl>(InstantiatedFrom), TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- MarkUnusedFileScopedDecl(InstantiationVar);
- } else if (isa<CXXRecordDecl>(Member)) {
- CXXRecordDecl *InstantiationClass = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Instantiation);
- if (InstantiationClass->getTemplateSpecializationKind() ==
- TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
- InstantiationClass->setTemplateSpecializationKind(
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- InstantiationClass->setLocation(Member->getLocation());
- }
-
- cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Member)->setInstantiationOfMemberClass(
- cast<CXXRecordDecl>(InstantiatedFrom),
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- } else {
- assert(isa<EnumDecl>(Member) && "Only member enums remain");
- EnumDecl *InstantiationEnum = cast<EnumDecl>(Instantiation);
- if (InstantiationEnum->getTemplateSpecializationKind() ==
- TSK_ImplicitInstantiation) {
- InstantiationEnum->setTemplateSpecializationKind(
- TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
- InstantiationEnum->setLocation(Member->getLocation());
- }
-
- cast<EnumDecl>(Member)->setInstantiationOfMemberEnum(
+ } else if (auto *MemberClass = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Member)) {
+ MemberClass->setInstantiationOfMemberClass(
+ cast<CXXRecordDecl>(InstantiatedFrom), TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
+ } else if (auto *MemberEnum = dyn_cast<EnumDecl>(Member)) {
+ MemberEnum->setInstantiationOfMemberEnum(
cast<EnumDecl>(InstantiatedFrom), TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
+ } else {
+ llvm_unreachable("unknown member specialization kind");
}
// Save the caller the trouble of having to figure out which declaration
@@ -8107,6 +8164,43 @@ Sema::CheckMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member, LookupResult &Previous) {
return false;
}
+/// Complete the explicit specialization of a member of a class template by
+/// updating the instantiated member to be marked as an explicit specialization.
+///
+/// \param OrigD The member declaration instantiated from the template.
+/// \param Loc The location of the explicit specialization of the member.
+template<typename DeclT>
+static void completeMemberSpecializationImpl(Sema &S, DeclT *OrigD,
+ SourceLocation Loc) {
+ if (OrigD->getTemplateSpecializationKind() != TSK_ImplicitInstantiation)
+ return;
+
+ // FIXME: Inform AST mutation listeners of this AST mutation.
+ // FIXME: If there are multiple in-class declarations of the member (from
+ // multiple modules, or a declaration and later definition of a member type),
+ // should we update all of them?
+ OrigD->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK_ExplicitSpecialization);
+ OrigD->setLocation(Loc);
+}
+
+void Sema::CompleteMemberSpecialization(NamedDecl *Member,
+ LookupResult &Previous) {
+ NamedDecl *Instantiation = cast<NamedDecl>(Member->getCanonicalDecl());
+ if (Instantiation == Member)
+ return;
+
+ if (auto *Function = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Instantiation))
+ completeMemberSpecializationImpl(*this, Function, Member->getLocation());
+ else if (auto *Var = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(Instantiation))
+ completeMemberSpecializationImpl(*this, Var, Member->getLocation());
+ else if (auto *Record = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Instantiation))
+ completeMemberSpecializationImpl(*this, Record, Member->getLocation());
+ else if (auto *Enum = dyn_cast<EnumDecl>(Instantiation))
+ completeMemberSpecializationImpl(*this, Enum, Member->getLocation());
+ else
+ llvm_unreachable("unknown member specialization kind");
+}
+
/// \brief Check the scope of an explicit instantiation.
///
/// \returns true if a serious error occurs, false otherwise.