summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp119
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..789232e0f5ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+//===- MakeGuardsExplicit.cpp - Turn guard intrinsics into guard branches -===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This pass lowers the @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic to the new form of
+// guard represented as widenable explicit branch to the deopt block. The
+// difference between this pass and LowerGuardIntrinsic is that after this pass
+// the guard represented as intrinsic:
+//
+// call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %old_cond) [ "deopt"() ]
+//
+// transforms to a guard represented as widenable explicit branch:
+//
+// %widenable_cond = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
+// br i1 (%old_cond & %widenable_cond), label %guarded, label %deopt
+//
+// Here:
+// - The semantics of @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition allows to replace
+// %widenable_cond with the construction (%widenable_cond & %any_other_cond)
+// without loss of correctness;
+// - %guarded is the lower part of old guard intrinsic's parent block split by
+// the intrinsic call;
+// - %deopt is a block containing a sole call to @llvm.experimental.deoptimize
+// intrinsic.
+//
+// Therefore, this branch preserves the property of widenability.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/MakeGuardsExplicit.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/GuardUtils.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/Pass.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/GuardUtils.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+namespace {
+struct MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
+ static char ID;
+ MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
+ initializeMakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
+ }
+
+ bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
+};
+}
+
+static void turnToExplicitForm(CallInst *Guard, Function *DeoptIntrinsic) {
+ // Replace the guard with an explicit branch (just like in GuardWidening).
+ BasicBlock *BB = Guard->getParent();
+ makeGuardControlFlowExplicit(DeoptIntrinsic, Guard);
+ BranchInst *ExplicitGuard = cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
+ assert(ExplicitGuard->isConditional() && "Must be!");
+
+ // We want the guard to be expressed as explicit control flow, but still be
+ // widenable. For that, we add Widenable Condition intrinsic call to the
+ // guard's condition.
+ IRBuilder<> B(ExplicitGuard);
+ auto *WidenableCondition =
+ B.CreateIntrinsic(Intrinsic::experimental_widenable_condition,
+ {}, {}, nullptr, "widenable_cond");
+ WidenableCondition->setCallingConv(Guard->getCallingConv());
+ auto *NewCond =
+ B.CreateAnd(ExplicitGuard->getCondition(), WidenableCondition);
+ NewCond->setName("exiplicit_guard_cond");
+ ExplicitGuard->setCondition(NewCond);
+ Guard->eraseFromParent();
+}
+
+static bool explicifyGuards(Function &F) {
+ // Check if we can cheaply rule out the possibility of not having any work to
+ // do.
+ auto *GuardDecl = F.getParent()->getFunction(
+ Intrinsic::getName(Intrinsic::experimental_guard));
+ if (!GuardDecl || GuardDecl->use_empty())
+ return false;
+
+ SmallVector<CallInst *, 8> GuardIntrinsics;
+ for (auto &I : instructions(F))
+ if (isGuard(&I))
+ GuardIntrinsics.push_back(cast<CallInst>(&I));
+
+ if (GuardIntrinsics.empty())
+ return false;
+
+ auto *DeoptIntrinsic = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
+ F.getParent(), Intrinsic::experimental_deoptimize, {F.getReturnType()});
+ DeoptIntrinsic->setCallingConv(GuardDecl->getCallingConv());
+
+ for (auto *Guard : GuardIntrinsics)
+ turnToExplicitForm(Guard, DeoptIntrinsic);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
+ return explicifyGuards(F);
+}
+
+char MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass::ID = 0;
+INITIALIZE_PASS(MakeGuardsExplicitLegacyPass, "make-guards-explicit",
+ "Lower the guard intrinsic to explicit control flow form",
+ false, false)
+
+PreservedAnalyses MakeGuardsExplicitPass::run(Function &F,
+ FunctionAnalysisManager &) {
+ if (explicifyGuards(F))
+ return PreservedAnalyses::none();
+ return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}