|  | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | 
|---|
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | `getopt(3)' should not print a warning for missing argument values.
PR:		bin/29625
Reviewed by:	mikeh
MFC after:	1 week
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=81746 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | in my tree for a long time.  bde reviewed this once upon a time and
said it was OK, iirc.  This also obviates the need to put ? in the
optstring argument to preclude the extra warning message which some
people think confuses users.  When I made my getopt cleanups of a long
time ago, this was the compromise reached.  I just neglected to commit
it until now.
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=65421 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| | a diagnostis).
Submitted by:	Guy Harris <gharris@flashcom.net>
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=54713 | 
|  | Notes:
    svn path=/vendor/CSRG/dist/; revision=23658 |