| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|  | 
`getopt(3)' should not print a warning for missing argument values.
PR:		bin/29625
Reviewed by:	mikeh
MFC after:	1 week
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=81746
 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|  | 
in my tree for a long time.  bde reviewed this once upon a time and
said it was OK, iirc.  This also obviates the need to put ? in the
optstring argument to preclude the extra warning message which some
people think confuses users.  When I made my getopt cleanups of a long
time ago, this was the compromise reached.  I just neglected to commit
it until now.
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=65421
 | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|  | 
a diagnostis).
Submitted by:	Guy Harris <gharris@flashcom.net>
Notes:
    svn path=/head/; revision=54713
 | 
|   
  
  
   | 
Notes:
    svn path=/vendor/CSRG/dist/; revision=23658
 |