| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`getopt(3)' should not print a warning for missing argument values.
PR: bin/29625
Reviewed by: mikeh
MFC after: 1 week
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=81746
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in my tree for a long time. bde reviewed this once upon a time and
said it was OK, iirc. This also obviates the need to put ? in the
optstring argument to preclude the extra warning message which some
people think confuses users. When I made my getopt cleanups of a long
time ago, this was the compromise reached. I just neglected to commit
it until now.
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=65421
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a diagnostis).
Submitted by: Guy Harris <gharris@flashcom.net>
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=54713
|
|
|
Notes:
svn path=/vendor/CSRG/dist/; revision=23658
|