From fd3bf33fd08e80d77fd2fe1c1a5607beffe5e7f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:03:58 +0000
Subject: upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro
 use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to''

Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS
---
 lib/libc/sys/close.2 | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'lib/libc/sys/close.2')

diff --git a/lib/libc/sys/close.2 b/lib/libc/sys/close.2
index b864545f5742..d3bb331836b4 100644
--- a/lib/libc/sys/close.2
+++ b/lib/libc/sys/close.2
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 .\" SUCH DAMAGE.
 .\"
 .\"     @(#)close.2	8.2 (Berkeley) 4/19/94
-.\"	$Id$
+.\"	$Id: close.2,v 1.4 1996/08/29 21:24:03 wosch Exp $
 .\"
 .Dd April 19, 1994
 .Dt CLOSE 2
@@ -138,9 +138,10 @@ An interrupt was received.
 .Xr execve 2 ,
 .Xr fcntl 2
 .Sh STANDARDS
-.Fn Close
-conforms to IEEE Std 1003.1-1988
-.Pq Dq Tn POSIX .
+The
+.Fn close
+function call is expected to conform to 
+.St -p1003.1-90 .
 .Sh HISTORY
 A
 .Fn close
-- 
cgit v1.3