From fd3bf33fd08e80d77fd2fe1c1a5607beffe5e7f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfram Schneider Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 20:03:58 +0000 Subject: upgrade STANDARDS from POSIX 1003.1-88 to 1003.1-90 using .St macro use ``is expected to conform to'' phrase, not ``conforms to'' Pointed out by: Bruce->NIST-PCTS --- lib/libc/sys/kill.2 | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/libc/sys/kill.2') diff --git a/lib/libc/sys/kill.2 b/lib/libc/sys/kill.2 index 1db80c56d4f4..252a4b4125ac 100644 --- a/lib/libc/sys/kill.2 +++ b/lib/libc/sys/kill.2 @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ .\" SUCH DAMAGE. .\" .\" @(#)kill.2 8.3 (Berkeley) 4/19/94 -.\" $Id$ +.\" $Id: kill.2,v 1.2 1996/08/29 21:24:10 wosch Exp $ .\" .Dd April 19, 1994 .Dt KILL 2 @@ -127,9 +127,8 @@ of the group could not be signaled. .Sh STANDARDS The .Fn kill -function is expected to -conform to IEEE Std 1003.1-1988 -.Pq Dq Tn POSIX . +function call is expected to conform to +.St -p1003.1-90 . .Sh HISTORY A .Fn kill -- cgit v1.3