FreeBSD source tree https://cgit-dev.freebsd.org/src/atom?h=releng%2F12.3 2016-12-16T23:05:47Z 2016-12-16T23:05:47Z Matthew Seaman matthew@FreeBSD.org 2016-12-16T23:05:47Z urn:sha1:aeb76c0bb7d53e6ee65bc12c6b75ec8078cbd833 The original problem with conflicting definitions of ${PKG_CMD} was solved by r427523 in ports (see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8677), so this should be safe now. Reviewed by: gjb Approved by: gjb Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8120 2016-11-30T22:00:25Z Glen Barber gjb@FreeBSD.org 2016-11-30T22:00:25Z urn:sha1:ebc7f2b8de85e24aae4235625a2756eae86d16ae Requested by: antoine Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8120 (related) Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation 2016-11-30T07:16:29Z Matthew Seaman matthew@FreeBSD.org 2016-11-30T07:16:29Z urn:sha1:91c915facf29fa2ded409354e49e9b8833c132f3 to create a repo during 'make packages' This would have been useful for a situation I found myself in where pkg(8) had been upgraded to a version that wanted the FBSD_1.5 ABI version but libc.so.7 had not been upgraded, and only provided FBSD_1.4. I found I needed to update libc in order to run pkg, and I also needed to use pkg to update libc... Which is why pkg-static exists, but there's currently no way to tell the build system to use pkg-static instead of pkg. This creates a variable PKG_CMD, default value 'pkg', that can be overridden from the command line. Reviewed by: gjb Approved by: gjb Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8120 2016-02-24T03:05:05Z Glen Barber gjb@FreeBSD.org 2016-02-24T03:05:05Z urn:sha1:3a3f435f98f5bdab7685a03370ccf22a958645e8 architectures we do not provide upstream pkg(8) packages. This is not tied to anything as-is, and likely will break your system if used (based on experience with testing with powerpc). There is an overwhelming amount of evil happening here, so until the issues are fixed, it will not be tied into the 'packages' target. Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation