diff options
author | Pavel Snajdr <snajpa@snajpa.net> | 2024-04-04 01:09:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-04-04 01:09:19 +0000 |
commit | 30c4eba4eaaef92cbc1b8d2eed6689600a342386 (patch) | |
tree | 1e5cddacf3bf4e005ee69274c24b4d003675ac18 | |
parent | 66929f6829985b9d90dcc0828291e5353e6b3fc9 (diff) | |
download | src-30c4eba4eaaef92cbc1b8d2eed6689600a342386.tar.gz src-30c4eba4eaaef92cbc1b8d2eed6689600a342386.zip |
Fix panics when truncating/deleting files
There's an union in dbuf_dirty_record_t; dr_brtwrite could evaluate
to B_TRUE if the dirty record is of another type than dl. Adding
more explicit dr type check before trying to access dr_brtwrite.
Fixes two similar panics:
[ 1373.806119] VERIFY0(db->db_level) failed (0 == 1)
[ 1373.807232] PANIC at dbuf.c:2549:dbuf_undirty()
[ 1373.814979] dump_stack_lvl+0x71/0x90
[ 1373.815799] spl_panic+0xd3/0x100 [spl]
[ 1373.827709] dbuf_undirty+0x62a/0x970 [zfs]
[ 1373.829204] dmu_buf_will_dirty_impl+0x1e9/0x5b0 [zfs]
[ 1373.831010] dnode_free_range+0x532/0x1220 [zfs]
[ 1373.833922] dmu_free_long_range+0x4e0/0x930 [zfs]
[ 1373.835277] zfs_trunc+0x75/0x1e0 [zfs]
[ 1373.837958] zfs_freesp+0x9b/0x470 [zfs]
[ 1373.847236] zfs_setattr+0x161a/0x3500 [zfs]
[ 1373.855267] zpl_setattr+0x125/0x320 [zfs]
[ 1373.856725] notify_change+0x1ee/0x4a0
[ 1373.859207] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0
[ 1373.859968] do_sys_ftruncate+0x28e/0x2e0
[ 1373.860962] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 1373.861751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[ 1822.381337] VERIFY0(db->db_level) failed (0 == 1)
[ 1822.382376] PANIC at dbuf.c:2549:dbuf_undirty()
[ 1822.389232] dump_stack_lvl+0x71/0x90
[ 1822.389920] spl_panic+0xd3/0x100 [spl]
[ 1822.399567] dbuf_undirty+0x62a/0x970 [zfs]
[ 1822.400583] dmu_buf_will_dirty_impl+0x1e9/0x5b0 [zfs]
[ 1822.401752] dnode_free_range+0x532/0x1220 [zfs]
[ 1822.402841] dmu_object_free+0x74/0x120 [zfs]
[ 1822.403869] zfs_znode_delete+0x75/0x120 [zfs]
[ 1822.404906] zfs_rmnode+0x3f6/0x7f0 [zfs]
[ 1822.405870] zfs_inactive+0xa3/0x610 [zfs]
[ 1822.407803] zpl_evict_inode+0x3e/0x90 [zfs]
[ 1822.408831] evict+0xc1/0x1c0
[ 1822.409387] do_unlinkat+0x147/0x300
[ 1822.410060] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0x33/0x60
[ 1822.410802] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 1822.411458] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Brian Atkinson <batkinson@lanl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Snajdr <snajpa@snajpa.net>
Closes #15983
-rw-r--r-- | module/zfs/dbuf.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/module/zfs/dbuf.c b/module/zfs/dbuf.c index 0ab143bd089f..d43f84e84725 100644 --- a/module/zfs/dbuf.c +++ b/module/zfs/dbuf.c @@ -2633,26 +2633,24 @@ dmu_buf_will_dirty_impl(dmu_buf_t *db_fake, int flags, dmu_tx_t *tx) ASSERT(!zfs_refcount_is_zero(&db->db_holds)); /* - * Quick check for dirtiness. For already dirty blocks, this - * reduces runtime of this function by >90%, and overall performance - * by 50% for some workloads (e.g. file deletion with indirect blocks - * cached). + * Quick check for dirtiness to improve performance for some workloads + * (e.g. file deletion with indirect blocks cached). */ mutex_enter(&db->db_mtx); - if (db->db_state == DB_CACHED || db->db_state == DB_NOFILL) { - dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr = dbuf_find_dirty_eq(db, tx->tx_txg); /* - * It's possible that it is already dirty but not cached, + * It's possible that the dbuf is already dirty but not cached, * because there are some calls to dbuf_dirty() that don't * go through dmu_buf_will_dirty(). */ + dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr = dbuf_find_dirty_eq(db, tx->tx_txg); if (dr != NULL) { - if (dr->dt.dl.dr_brtwrite) { + if (db->db_level == 0 && + dr->dt.dl.dr_brtwrite) { /* * Block cloning: If we are dirtying a cloned - * block, we cannot simply redirty it, because - * this dr has no data associated with it. + * level 0 block, we cannot simply redirty it, + * because this dr has no associated data. * We will go through a full undirtying below, * before dirtying it again. */ |