diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp | 617 | 
1 files changed, 617 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..412a00095b9b --- /dev/null +++ b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/ShrinkWrap.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,617 @@ +//===- ShrinkWrap.cpp - Compute safe point for prolog/epilog insertion ----===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// This pass looks for safe point where the prologue and epilogue can be +// inserted. +// The safe point for the prologue (resp. epilogue) is called Save +// (resp. Restore). +// A point is safe for prologue (resp. epilogue) if and only if +// it 1) dominates (resp. post-dominates) all the frame related operations and +// between 2) two executions of the Save (resp. Restore) point there is an +// execution of the Restore (resp. Save) point. +// +// For instance, the following points are safe: +// for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { +//   Save +//   ... +//   Restore +// } +// Indeed, the execution looks like Save -> Restore -> Save -> Restore ... +// And the following points are not: +// for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { +//   Save +//   ... +// } +// for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { +//   ... +//   Restore +// } +// Indeed, the execution looks like Save -> Save -> ... -> Restore -> Restore. +// +// This pass also ensures that the safe points are 3) cheaper than the regular +// entry and exits blocks. +// +// Property #1 is ensured via the use of MachineDominatorTree and +// MachinePostDominatorTree. +// Property #2 is ensured via property #1 and MachineLoopInfo, i.e., both +// points must be in the same loop. +// Property #3 is ensured via the MachineBlockFrequencyInfo. +// +// If this pass found points matching all these properties, then +// MachineFrameInfo is updated with this information. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "llvm/ADT/BitVector.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/CFG.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBlockFrequencyInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachinePostDominators.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterClassInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetFrameLowering.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetLowering.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetRegisterInfo.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSubtargetInfo.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Attributes.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Function.h" +#include "llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h" +#include "llvm/Pass.h" +#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" +#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" +#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h" +#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" +#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h" +#include <cassert> +#include <cstdint> +#include <memory> + +using namespace llvm; + +#define DEBUG_TYPE "shrink-wrap" + +STATISTIC(NumFunc, "Number of functions"); +STATISTIC(NumCandidates, "Number of shrink-wrapping candidates"); +STATISTIC(NumCandidatesDropped, +          "Number of shrink-wrapping candidates dropped because of frequency"); + +static cl::opt<cl::boolOrDefault> +EnableShrinkWrapOpt("enable-shrink-wrap", cl::Hidden, +                    cl::desc("enable the shrink-wrapping pass")); + +namespace { + +/// Class to determine where the safe point to insert the +/// prologue and epilogue are. +/// Unlike the paper from Fred C. Chow, PLDI'88, that introduces the +/// shrink-wrapping term for prologue/epilogue placement, this pass +/// does not rely on expensive data-flow analysis. Instead we use the +/// dominance properties and loop information to decide which point +/// are safe for such insertion. +class ShrinkWrap : public MachineFunctionPass { +  /// Hold callee-saved information. +  RegisterClassInfo RCI; +  MachineDominatorTree *MDT; +  MachinePostDominatorTree *MPDT; + +  /// Current safe point found for the prologue. +  /// The prologue will be inserted before the first instruction +  /// in this basic block. +  MachineBasicBlock *Save; + +  /// Current safe point found for the epilogue. +  /// The epilogue will be inserted before the first terminator instruction +  /// in this basic block. +  MachineBasicBlock *Restore; + +  /// Hold the information of the basic block frequency. +  /// Use to check the profitability of the new points. +  MachineBlockFrequencyInfo *MBFI; + +  /// Hold the loop information. Used to determine if Save and Restore +  /// are in the same loop. +  MachineLoopInfo *MLI; + +  // Emit remarks. +  MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE = nullptr; + +  /// Frequency of the Entry block. +  uint64_t EntryFreq; + +  /// Current opcode for frame setup. +  unsigned FrameSetupOpcode; + +  /// Current opcode for frame destroy. +  unsigned FrameDestroyOpcode; + +  /// Stack pointer register, used by llvm.{savestack,restorestack} +  unsigned SP; + +  /// Entry block. +  const MachineBasicBlock *Entry; + +  using SetOfRegs = SmallSetVector<unsigned, 16>; + +  /// Registers that need to be saved for the current function. +  mutable SetOfRegs CurrentCSRs; + +  /// Current MachineFunction. +  MachineFunction *MachineFunc; + +  /// Check if \p MI uses or defines a callee-saved register or +  /// a frame index. If this is the case, this means \p MI must happen +  /// after Save and before Restore. +  bool useOrDefCSROrFI(const MachineInstr &MI, RegScavenger *RS) const; + +  const SetOfRegs &getCurrentCSRs(RegScavenger *RS) const { +    if (CurrentCSRs.empty()) { +      BitVector SavedRegs; +      const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = +          MachineFunc->getSubtarget().getFrameLowering(); + +      TFI->determineCalleeSaves(*MachineFunc, SavedRegs, RS); + +      for (int Reg = SavedRegs.find_first(); Reg != -1; +           Reg = SavedRegs.find_next(Reg)) +        CurrentCSRs.insert((unsigned)Reg); +    } +    return CurrentCSRs; +  } + +  /// Update the Save and Restore points such that \p MBB is in +  /// the region that is dominated by Save and post-dominated by Restore +  /// and Save and Restore still match the safe point definition. +  /// Such point may not exist and Save and/or Restore may be null after +  /// this call. +  void updateSaveRestorePoints(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, RegScavenger *RS); + +  /// Initialize the pass for \p MF. +  void init(MachineFunction &MF) { +    RCI.runOnMachineFunction(MF); +    MDT = &getAnalysis<MachineDominatorTree>(); +    MPDT = &getAnalysis<MachinePostDominatorTree>(); +    Save = nullptr; +    Restore = nullptr; +    MBFI = &getAnalysis<MachineBlockFrequencyInfo>(); +    MLI = &getAnalysis<MachineLoopInfo>(); +    ORE = &getAnalysis<MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitterPass>().getORE(); +    EntryFreq = MBFI->getEntryFreq(); +    const TargetSubtargetInfo &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget(); +    const TargetInstrInfo &TII = *Subtarget.getInstrInfo(); +    FrameSetupOpcode = TII.getCallFrameSetupOpcode(); +    FrameDestroyOpcode = TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode(); +    SP = Subtarget.getTargetLowering()->getStackPointerRegisterToSaveRestore(); +    Entry = &MF.front(); +    CurrentCSRs.clear(); +    MachineFunc = &MF; + +    ++NumFunc; +  } + +  /// Check whether or not Save and Restore points are still interesting for +  /// shrink-wrapping. +  bool ArePointsInteresting() const { return Save != Entry && Save && Restore; } + +  /// Check if shrink wrapping is enabled for this target and function. +  static bool isShrinkWrapEnabled(const MachineFunction &MF); + +public: +  static char ID; + +  ShrinkWrap() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) { +    initializeShrinkWrapPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); +  } + +  void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { +    AU.setPreservesAll(); +    AU.addRequired<MachineBlockFrequencyInfo>(); +    AU.addRequired<MachineDominatorTree>(); +    AU.addRequired<MachinePostDominatorTree>(); +    AU.addRequired<MachineLoopInfo>(); +    AU.addRequired<MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitterPass>(); +    MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU); +  } + +  MachineFunctionProperties getRequiredProperties() const override { +    return MachineFunctionProperties().set( +      MachineFunctionProperties::Property::NoVRegs); +  } + +  StringRef getPassName() const override { return "Shrink Wrapping analysis"; } + +  /// Perform the shrink-wrapping analysis and update +  /// the MachineFrameInfo attached to \p MF with the results. +  bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override; +}; + +} // end anonymous namespace + +char ShrinkWrap::ID = 0; + +char &llvm::ShrinkWrapID = ShrinkWrap::ID; + +INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(ShrinkWrap, DEBUG_TYPE, "Shrink Wrap Pass", false, false) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineBlockFrequencyInfo) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineDominatorTree) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachinePostDominatorTree) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineLoopInfo) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitterPass) +INITIALIZE_PASS_END(ShrinkWrap, DEBUG_TYPE, "Shrink Wrap Pass", false, false) + +bool ShrinkWrap::useOrDefCSROrFI(const MachineInstr &MI, +                                 RegScavenger *RS) const { +  // This prevents premature stack popping when occurs a indirect stack +  // access. It is overly aggressive for the moment. +  // TODO: - Obvious non-stack loads and store, such as global values, +  //         are known to not access the stack. +  //       - Further, data dependency and alias analysis can validate +  //         that load and stores never derive from the stack pointer. +  if (MI.mayLoadOrStore()) +    return true; + +  if (MI.getOpcode() == FrameSetupOpcode || +      MI.getOpcode() == FrameDestroyOpcode) { +    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Frame instruction: " << MI << '\n'); +    return true; +  } +  for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI.operands()) { +    bool UseOrDefCSR = false; +    if (MO.isReg()) { +      // Ignore instructions like DBG_VALUE which don't read/def the register. +      if (!MO.isDef() && !MO.readsReg()) +        continue; +      Register PhysReg = MO.getReg(); +      if (!PhysReg) +        continue; +      assert(Register::isPhysicalRegister(PhysReg) && "Unallocated register?!"); +      // The stack pointer is not normally described as a callee-saved register +      // in calling convention definitions, so we need to watch for it +      // separately. An SP mentioned by a call instruction, we can ignore, +      // though, as it's harmless and we do not want to effectively disable tail +      // calls by forcing the restore point to post-dominate them. +      UseOrDefCSR = (!MI.isCall() && PhysReg == SP) || +                    RCI.getLastCalleeSavedAlias(PhysReg); +    } else if (MO.isRegMask()) { +      // Check if this regmask clobbers any of the CSRs. +      for (unsigned Reg : getCurrentCSRs(RS)) { +        if (MO.clobbersPhysReg(Reg)) { +          UseOrDefCSR = true; +          break; +        } +      } +    } +    // Skip FrameIndex operands in DBG_VALUE instructions. +    if (UseOrDefCSR || (MO.isFI() && !MI.isDebugValue())) { +      LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Use or define CSR(" << UseOrDefCSR << ") or FI(" +                        << MO.isFI() << "): " << MI << '\n'); +      return true; +    } +  } +  return false; +} + +/// Helper function to find the immediate (post) dominator. +template <typename ListOfBBs, typename DominanceAnalysis> +static MachineBasicBlock *FindIDom(MachineBasicBlock &Block, ListOfBBs BBs, +                                   DominanceAnalysis &Dom) { +  MachineBasicBlock *IDom = &Block; +  for (MachineBasicBlock *BB : BBs) { +    IDom = Dom.findNearestCommonDominator(IDom, BB); +    if (!IDom) +      break; +  } +  if (IDom == &Block) +    return nullptr; +  return IDom; +} + +void ShrinkWrap::updateSaveRestorePoints(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, +                                         RegScavenger *RS) { +  // Get rid of the easy cases first. +  if (!Save) +    Save = &MBB; +  else +    Save = MDT->findNearestCommonDominator(Save, &MBB); + +  if (!Save) { +    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Found a block that is not reachable from Entry\n"); +    return; +  } + +  if (!Restore) +    Restore = &MBB; +  else if (MPDT->getNode(&MBB)) // If the block is not in the post dom tree, it +                                // means the block never returns. If that's the +                                // case, we don't want to call +                                // `findNearestCommonDominator`, which will +                                // return `Restore`. +    Restore = MPDT->findNearestCommonDominator(Restore, &MBB); +  else +    Restore = nullptr; // Abort, we can't find a restore point in this case. + +  // Make sure we would be able to insert the restore code before the +  // terminator. +  if (Restore == &MBB) { +    for (const MachineInstr &Terminator : MBB.terminators()) { +      if (!useOrDefCSROrFI(Terminator, RS)) +        continue; +      // One of the terminator needs to happen before the restore point. +      if (MBB.succ_empty()) { +        Restore = nullptr; // Abort, we can't find a restore point in this case. +        break; +      } +      // Look for a restore point that post-dominates all the successors. +      // The immediate post-dominator is what we are looking for. +      Restore = FindIDom<>(*Restore, Restore->successors(), *MPDT); +      break; +    } +  } + +  if (!Restore) { +    LLVM_DEBUG( +        dbgs() << "Restore point needs to be spanned on several blocks\n"); +    return; +  } + +  // Make sure Save and Restore are suitable for shrink-wrapping: +  // 1. all path from Save needs to lead to Restore before exiting. +  // 2. all path to Restore needs to go through Save from Entry. +  // We achieve that by making sure that: +  // A. Save dominates Restore. +  // B. Restore post-dominates Save. +  // C. Save and Restore are in the same loop. +  bool SaveDominatesRestore = false; +  bool RestorePostDominatesSave = false; +  while (Save && Restore && +         (!(SaveDominatesRestore = MDT->dominates(Save, Restore)) || +          !(RestorePostDominatesSave = MPDT->dominates(Restore, Save)) || +          // Post-dominance is not enough in loops to ensure that all uses/defs +          // are after the prologue and before the epilogue at runtime. +          // E.g., +          // while(1) { +          //  Save +          //  Restore +          //   if (...) +          //     break; +          //  use/def CSRs +          // } +          // All the uses/defs of CSRs are dominated by Save and post-dominated +          // by Restore. However, the CSRs uses are still reachable after +          // Restore and before Save are executed. +          // +          // For now, just push the restore/save points outside of loops. +          // FIXME: Refine the criteria to still find interesting cases +          // for loops. +          MLI->getLoopFor(Save) || MLI->getLoopFor(Restore))) { +    // Fix (A). +    if (!SaveDominatesRestore) { +      Save = MDT->findNearestCommonDominator(Save, Restore); +      continue; +    } +    // Fix (B). +    if (!RestorePostDominatesSave) +      Restore = MPDT->findNearestCommonDominator(Restore, Save); + +    // Fix (C). +    if (Save && Restore && +        (MLI->getLoopFor(Save) || MLI->getLoopFor(Restore))) { +      if (MLI->getLoopDepth(Save) > MLI->getLoopDepth(Restore)) { +        // Push Save outside of this loop if immediate dominator is different +        // from save block. If immediate dominator is not different, bail out. +        Save = FindIDom<>(*Save, Save->predecessors(), *MDT); +        if (!Save) +          break; +      } else { +        // If the loop does not exit, there is no point in looking +        // for a post-dominator outside the loop. +        SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock*, 4> ExitBlocks; +        MLI->getLoopFor(Restore)->getExitingBlocks(ExitBlocks); +        // Push Restore outside of this loop. +        // Look for the immediate post-dominator of the loop exits. +        MachineBasicBlock *IPdom = Restore; +        for (MachineBasicBlock *LoopExitBB: ExitBlocks) { +          IPdom = FindIDom<>(*IPdom, LoopExitBB->successors(), *MPDT); +          if (!IPdom) +            break; +        } +        // If the immediate post-dominator is not in a less nested loop, +        // then we are stuck in a program with an infinite loop. +        // In that case, we will not find a safe point, hence, bail out. +        if (IPdom && MLI->getLoopDepth(IPdom) < MLI->getLoopDepth(Restore)) +          Restore = IPdom; +        else { +          Restore = nullptr; +          break; +        } +      } +    } +  } +} + +static bool giveUpWithRemarks(MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter *ORE, +                              StringRef RemarkName, StringRef RemarkMessage, +                              const DiagnosticLocation &Loc, +                              const MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { +  ORE->emit([&]() { +    return MachineOptimizationRemarkMissed(DEBUG_TYPE, RemarkName, Loc, MBB) +           << RemarkMessage; +  }); + +  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << RemarkMessage << '\n'); +  return false; +} + +bool ShrinkWrap::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) { +  if (skipFunction(MF.getFunction()) || MF.empty() || !isShrinkWrapEnabled(MF)) +    return false; + +  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "**** Analysing " << MF.getName() << '\n'); + +  init(MF); + +  ReversePostOrderTraversal<MachineBasicBlock *> RPOT(&*MF.begin()); +  if (containsIrreducibleCFG<MachineBasicBlock *>(RPOT, *MLI)) { +    // If MF is irreducible, a block may be in a loop without +    // MachineLoopInfo reporting it. I.e., we may use the +    // post-dominance property in loops, which lead to incorrect +    // results. Moreover, we may miss that the prologue and +    // epilogue are not in the same loop, leading to unbalanced +    // construction/deconstruction of the stack frame. +    return giveUpWithRemarks(ORE, "UnsupportedIrreducibleCFG", +                             "Irreducible CFGs are not supported yet.", +                             MF.getFunction().getSubprogram(), &MF.front()); +  } + +  const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo(); +  std::unique_ptr<RegScavenger> RS( +      TRI->requiresRegisterScavenging(MF) ? new RegScavenger() : nullptr); + +  for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) { +    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Look into: " << MBB.getNumber() << ' ' +                      << MBB.getName() << '\n'); + +    if (MBB.isEHFuncletEntry()) +      return giveUpWithRemarks(ORE, "UnsupportedEHFunclets", +                               "EH Funclets are not supported yet.", +                               MBB.front().getDebugLoc(), &MBB); + +    if (MBB.isEHPad()) { +      // Push the prologue and epilogue outside of +      // the region that may throw by making sure +      // that all the landing pads are at least at the +      // boundary of the save and restore points. +      // The problem with exceptions is that the throw +      // is not properly modeled and in particular, a +      // basic block can jump out from the middle. +      updateSaveRestorePoints(MBB, RS.get()); +      if (!ArePointsInteresting()) { +        LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "EHPad prevents shrink-wrapping\n"); +        return false; +      } +      continue; +    } + +    for (const MachineInstr &MI : MBB) { +      if (!useOrDefCSROrFI(MI, RS.get())) +        continue; +      // Save (resp. restore) point must dominate (resp. post dominate) +      // MI. Look for the proper basic block for those. +      updateSaveRestorePoints(MBB, RS.get()); +      // If we are at a point where we cannot improve the placement of +      // save/restore instructions, just give up. +      if (!ArePointsInteresting()) { +        LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "No Shrink wrap candidate found\n"); +        return false; +      } +      // No need to look for other instructions, this basic block +      // will already be part of the handled region. +      break; +    } +  } +  if (!ArePointsInteresting()) { +    // If the points are not interesting at this point, then they must be null +    // because it means we did not encounter any frame/CSR related code. +    // Otherwise, we would have returned from the previous loop. +    assert(!Save && !Restore && "We miss a shrink-wrap opportunity?!"); +    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Nothing to shrink-wrap\n"); +    return false; +  } + +  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n ** Results **\nFrequency of the Entry: " << EntryFreq +                    << '\n'); + +  const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getSubtarget().getFrameLowering(); +  do { +    LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Shrink wrap candidates (#, Name, Freq):\nSave: " +                      << Save->getNumber() << ' ' << Save->getName() << ' ' +                      << MBFI->getBlockFreq(Save).getFrequency() +                      << "\nRestore: " << Restore->getNumber() << ' ' +                      << Restore->getName() << ' ' +                      << MBFI->getBlockFreq(Restore).getFrequency() << '\n'); + +    bool IsSaveCheap, TargetCanUseSaveAsPrologue = false; +    if (((IsSaveCheap = EntryFreq >= MBFI->getBlockFreq(Save).getFrequency()) && +         EntryFreq >= MBFI->getBlockFreq(Restore).getFrequency()) && +        ((TargetCanUseSaveAsPrologue = TFI->canUseAsPrologue(*Save)) && +         TFI->canUseAsEpilogue(*Restore))) +      break; +    LLVM_DEBUG( +        dbgs() << "New points are too expensive or invalid for the target\n"); +    MachineBasicBlock *NewBB; +    if (!IsSaveCheap || !TargetCanUseSaveAsPrologue) { +      Save = FindIDom<>(*Save, Save->predecessors(), *MDT); +      if (!Save) +        break; +      NewBB = Save; +    } else { +      // Restore is expensive. +      Restore = FindIDom<>(*Restore, Restore->successors(), *MPDT); +      if (!Restore) +        break; +      NewBB = Restore; +    } +    updateSaveRestorePoints(*NewBB, RS.get()); +  } while (Save && Restore); + +  if (!ArePointsInteresting()) { +    ++NumCandidatesDropped; +    return false; +  } + +  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Final shrink wrap candidates:\nSave: " +                    << Save->getNumber() << ' ' << Save->getName() +                    << "\nRestore: " << Restore->getNumber() << ' ' +                    << Restore->getName() << '\n'); + +  MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo(); +  MFI.setSavePoint(Save); +  MFI.setRestorePoint(Restore); +  ++NumCandidates; +  return false; +} + +bool ShrinkWrap::isShrinkWrapEnabled(const MachineFunction &MF) { +  const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getSubtarget().getFrameLowering(); + +  switch (EnableShrinkWrapOpt) { +  case cl::BOU_UNSET: +    return TFI->enableShrinkWrapping(MF) && +           // Windows with CFI has some limitations that make it impossible +           // to use shrink-wrapping. +           !MF.getTarget().getMCAsmInfo()->usesWindowsCFI() && +           // Sanitizers look at the value of the stack at the location +           // of the crash. Since a crash can happen anywhere, the +           // frame must be lowered before anything else happen for the +           // sanitizers to be able to get a correct stack frame. +           !(MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SanitizeAddress) || +             MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SanitizeThread) || +             MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SanitizeMemory) || +             MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute(Attribute::SanitizeHWAddress)); +  // If EnableShrinkWrap is set, it takes precedence on whatever the +  // target sets. The rational is that we assume we want to test +  // something related to shrink-wrapping. +  case cl::BOU_TRUE: +    return true; +  case cl::BOU_FALSE: +    return false; +  } +  llvm_unreachable("Invalid shrink-wrapping state"); +}  | 
