summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll')
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll91
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll b/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll
index 62f26106afb2..c01eef1d0e5d 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/pr18861.ll
@@ -2,42 +2,85 @@
@b = external global i32, align 4
+; Test that LoopUnroll does not break LCSSA form.
+;
+; In this function we have a following CFG:
+; ( entry )
+; |
+; v
+; ( outer.header ) <--
+; | \
+; v |
+; --> ( inner.header ) |
+; / / \ |
+; \ / \ |
+; \ v v /
+; ( inner.latch ) ( outer.latch )
+; |
+; v
+; ( exit )
+;
+; When the inner loop is unrolled, we inner.latch block has only one
+; predecessor and one successor, so it can be merged with exit block.
+; During the merge, however, we remove an LCSSA definition for
+; %storemerge1.lcssa, breaking LCSSA form for the outer loop.
+
; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable
define void @fn1() #0 {
entry:
- br label %for.cond1thread-pre-split
-
-for.cond1thread-pre-split: ; preds = %for.inc8, %entry
- %storemerge1 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc9, %for.inc8 ]
- br i1 undef, label %for.inc8, label %for.cond2.preheader.lr.ph
+ br label %outer.header
-for.cond2.preheader.lr.ph: ; preds = %for.cond1thread-pre-split
- br label %for.cond2.preheader
+outer.header: ; preds = %outer.latch, %entry
+ %storemerge1 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc9, %outer.latch ]
+ br label %inner.header
-for.cond2.preheader: ; preds = %for.inc5, %for.cond2.preheader.lr.ph
- br label %for.cond2
-
-for.cond2: ; preds = %for.body3, %for.cond2.preheader
- %storemerge = phi i32 [ %add, %for.body3 ], [ 0, %for.cond2.preheader ]
+inner.header: ; preds = %inner.latch, %outer.header
+ %storemerge = phi i32 [ %add, %inner.latch ], [ 0, %outer.header ]
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %storemerge, 1
- br i1 %cmp, label %for.body3, label %for.inc5
+ br i1 %cmp, label %inner.latch, label %outer.latch
-for.body3: ; preds = %for.cond2
+inner.latch: ; preds = %inner.header
%tobool4 = icmp eq i32 %storemerge, 0
%add = add nsw i32 %storemerge, 1
- br i1 %tobool4, label %for.cond2, label %if.then
+ br i1 %tobool4, label %inner.header, label %exit
-if.then: ; preds = %for.body3
- store i32 %storemerge1, i32* @b, align 4
+exit: ; preds = %inner.latch
+ %storemerge1.lcssa = phi i32 [ %storemerge1, %inner.latch ]
+ store i32 %storemerge1.lcssa, i32* @b, align 4
ret void
-for.inc5: ; preds = %for.cond2
- br i1 undef, label %for.cond1.for.inc8_crit_edge, label %for.cond2.preheader
+outer.latch: ; preds = %inner.header
+ %inc9 = add nsw i32 %storemerge1, 1
+ br label %outer.header
+}
-for.cond1.for.inc8_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.inc5
- br label %for.inc8
+; This case is similar to the previous one, and has the same CFG.
+; The difference is that loop unrolling doesn't remove any LCSSA definition,
+; yet breaks LCSSA form for the outer loop. It happens because before unrolling
+; block inner.latch was inside outer loop (and consequently, didn't require
+; LCSSA definition for %x), but after unrolling it occurs out of the outer
+; loop, so we need to insert an LCSSA definition to keep LCSSA.
-for.inc8: ; preds = %for.cond1.for.inc8_crit_edge, %for.cond1thread-pre-split
- %inc9 = add nsw i32 %storemerge1, 1
- br label %for.cond1thread-pre-split
+; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable
+define void @fn2() {
+entry:
+ br label %outer.header
+
+outer.header:
+ br label %inner.header
+
+inner.header:
+ %x = load i32, i32* undef, align 4
+ br i1 true, label %outer.latch, label %inner.latch
+
+inner.latch:
+ %inc6 = add nsw i32 %x, 1
+ store i32 %inc6, i32* undef, align 4
+ br i1 false, label %inner.header, label %exit
+
+exit:
+ ret void
+
+outer.latch:
+ br label %outer.header
}