| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that there is ongoing discussion about approval requirement
for userland PRNG bits.
Reviewed by: so (des)
Approved by: core (jhb)
Approved by: re (gjb)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=255635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: core (implicit)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=244822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: core (implicit)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=179574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: core (two months ago)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=175650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: core (jhb)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=154289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: core (quite a while ago)
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=146891
|
|
the role of MAINTAINERS into advisory and strict parts. Introduce a
new LOCKS file to document enforced locked parts of the tree.
Strict locks are only added with core approval and will generally
have a renewal timeout.
Clarify that the source tree is a community effort, not a place to stake
out 'turf'.
This will be refined as needed.
With-core-hat-on: Yes
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=146890
|