From 39e6df996fcd79beb7ea71a2c942103a2b99e68e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:19:23 +0000
Subject: MFhead r210539:   Document that the "ngtee" action no longer accepts
 packet, and   thus don't depend on one_pass flag anymore.

  This is a POLA violation, but it is quite difficult to restore
  the old behavior with new code. Also, the new behavior matches
  behavior of the older "tee" action, and this is more intuitive.
---
 sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'sbin')

diff --git a/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 b/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
index 897cd3fd59ae..2895170411a9 100644
--- a/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
+++ b/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 .\"
 .\" $FreeBSD$
 .\"
-.Dd June 24, 2009
+.Dd July 27, 2010
 .Dt IPFW 8
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -859,9 +859,7 @@ accepted or continues with the next rule, depending on
 sysctl variable.
 .It Cm ngtee Ar cookie
 A copy of packet is diverted into netgraph, original
-packet is either accepted or continues with the next rule, depending on
-.Va net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass
-sysctl variable.
+packet continues with the next rule.
 See
 .Xr ng_ipfw 4
 for more information on
-- 
cgit v1.3