diff options
| author | John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> | 2019-11-21 17:38:49 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> | 2019-11-21 17:38:49 +0000 |
| commit | 2df62d170d7ab12d99bee34ffa8988ced2e95063 (patch) | |
| tree | d466755286cea677077cd2f6d700dc59b1032280 | |
| parent | a29c43d60a7946065a424d9b63a75d5ceec58194 (diff) | |
Notes
| -rw-r--r-- | en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.xml | 436 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml | 178 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/index.xml | 4 |
3 files changed, 435 insertions, 183 deletions
diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.xml index 369af10b3c..32c94c627f 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.xml @@ -4002,170 +4002,332 @@ Relnotes: yes</programlisting> documentation team, security officer, and release engineering teams. Diversity in hardware support broadens the options for &os; consumers by offering new features and usage - opportunities (such as support for 64-bit CPUs, use in - embedded environments, etc.), but these benefits must always + opportunities, but these benefits must always be carefully considered in terms of the real-world maintenance cost associated with additional platform support.</para> - <para>The &os; Project differentiates platform targets into - four tiers. Each tier includes a specification of the - requirements for an architecture to be in that tier, - as well as specifying the obligations of developers with - regards to the platform. In addition, a policy is defined - regarding the circumstances required to change the tier - of an architecture.</para> + <para>The &os; Project differentiates platform targets into four + tiers. Each tier includes a list of guarantees consumers may + rely on as well as obligations by the Project and developers + to fulfill those guarantees. These lists define the minimum + guarantees for each tier. The Project and developers may + provide additional levels of support beyond the minimum + guarantees for a given tier, but such additional support is + not guaranteed. Each platform target is assigned to a + specific tier for each stable branch. As a result, a platform + target might be assigned to different tiers on concurrent + stable branches.</para> </sect2> <sect2> - <title>Tier 1: Fully Supported Architectures</title> - - <para>Tier 1 platforms are fully supported by the security - officer, release engineering, and toolchain maintenance staff. - New features added to the operating system must be fully - functional across all Tier 1 architectures for every release - (features which are inherently architecture-specific, such as - support for hardware device drivers, may be exempt from this - requirement). In general, all Tier 1 platforms must have - build and test automation support either in the FreeBSD.org - cluster, or easily available for all developers. Embedded - platforms may substitute an emulator available in the - FreeBSD.org cluster for actual hardware.</para> - - <para>Tier 1 architectures are expected to be Production Quality - with respects to all aspects of the &os; operating system, - including installation and development environments.</para> - - <para>Tier 1 architectures are expected to be completely - integrated into the source tree and have all features - necessary to produce an entire system relevant for that target - architecture. Tier 1 architectures generally have at least 6 - active developers.</para> - - <para>Tier 1 architectures are expected to be fully supported by - the ports system. All the ports should build on a Tier 1 - platform, or have the appropriate filters to prevent the - inappropriate ones from building there. The packaging system - must support all Tier 1 architectures. To ensure an - architecture's Tier 1 status, proponents of that architecture - must show that all relevant packages can be built on that - platform.</para> - - <para>Tier 1 embedded architectures must be able to cross-build - packages on at least one other Tier 1 architecture. The - packages must be the most relevant for the platform, but may - be a non-empty subset of those that build natively.</para> - - <para>Tier 1 architectures must be fully documented. All basic - operations need to be covered by the handbook or other - documents. All relevant integration documentation must also - be integrated into the tree, or readily available.</para> - - <para>Current Tier 1 platforms are &arch.i386; and - &arch.amd64;.</para> + <title>Platform Targets</title> + + <para>Support for a hardware platform consists of two + components: kernel support and userland Application Binary + Interfaces (ABIs). Kernel platform support includes things + needed to run a &os; kernel on a hardware platform such as + machine-dependent virtual memory management and device + drivers. A userland ABI specifies an interface for user + processes to interact with a &os; kernel and base system + libraries. A userland ABI includes system call interfaces, + the layout and semantics of public data structures, and the + layout and semantics of arguments passed to subroutines. Some + components of an ABI may be defined by specifications such as + the layout of C++ exception objects or calling conventions for + C functions.</para> + + <para>A &os; kernel also uses an ABI (sometimes referred to as + the Kernel Binary Interface (KBI)) which includes the + semantics and layouts of public data structures and the layout + and semantics of arguments to public functions within the + kernel itself.</para> + + <para>A &os; kernel may support multiple userland ABIs. For + example, &os;'s amd64 kernel supports &os; amd64 and i386 + userland ABIs as well as Linux x86_64 and i386 userland ABIs. + A &os; kernel should support a <quote>native</quote> ABI as + the default ABI. The native <quote>ABI</quote> generally + shares certain properties with the kernel ABI such as the C + calling convention, sizes of basic types, etc.</para> + + <para>Tiers are defined for both kernels and userland ABIs. In + the common case, a platform's kernel and &os; ABIs are + assigned to the same tier.</para> </sect2> <sect2> - <title>Tier 2: Developmental Architectures</title> - - <para>Tier 2 platforms are not supported by the security officer - and release engineering teams. Platform maintainers are - responsible for toolchain support in the tree. The toolchain - maintainers are expected to work with the platform maintainers - to refine these changes. Major new toolchain components are - allowed to break support for Tier 2 architectures if the - &os;-local changes have not been incorporated upstream. - The toolchain maintainers are expected to provide prompt - review of any proposed changes and cannot block, through their - inaction, changes going into the tree. New features added to - &os; should be feasible to implement on these platforms, - but an implementation is not required before the feature may - be added to the &os; source tree. New features that may be - difficult to implement on Tier 2 architectures should provide - a means of disabling them on those architectures. The - implementation of a Tier 2 architecture may be committed to - the main &os; tree as long as it does not interfere with - production work on Tier 1 platforms, or substantially with - other Tier 2 platforms. Before a Tier 2 platform can be added - to the &os; base source tree, the platform must be able to - boot multi-user on actual hardware. Generally, there must be - at least three active developers working on the - platform.</para> - - <para>Tier 2 architectures are usually systems targeted at Tier - 1 support, but that are still under development. - Architectures reaching end of life may also be moved from Tier - 1 status to Tier 2 status as the availability of resources to - continue to maintain the system in a Production Quality state - diminishes. Well supported niche architectures may also be - Tier 2.</para> - - <para>Tier 2 architectures have basic support for them - integrated into the ports infrastructure. They may have cross - compilation support added, at the discretion of portmgr. Some - ports must built natively into packages if the package system - supports that architecture. If not integrated into the base - system, some external patches for the architecture for ports - must be available.</para> - - <para>Tier 2 architectures can be integrated into the &os; - handbook. The basics for how to get a system running must be - documented, although not necessarily for every single board or - system a Tier 2 architecture supports. The supported hardware - list must exist and be relatively recent. It should be - integrated into the &os; documentation.</para> - - <para>Current Tier 2 platforms are &arch.arm;, &arch.arm64;, - &arch.mips;, &arch.powerpc;, and &arch.sparc64;.</para> + <title>Tier 1: Fully-Supported Architectures</title> + + <para>Tier 1 platforms are the most mature &os; platforms. + They are supported by the security officer, release + engineering, and port management teams. Tier 1 architectures + are expected to be Production Quality with respect to all + aspects of the &os; operating system, including installation + and development environments.</para> + + <para>The &os; Project provides the following guarantees to + consumers of Tier 1 platforms:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Official &os; release images will be provided by the + release engineering team.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Binary updates and source patches for Security + Advisories and Errata Notices will be provided for + supported releases.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Source patches for Security Advisories will be + provided for supported branches.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Binary updates and source patches for cross-platform + Security Advisories will typically be provided at the time + of the announcement.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Changes to userland ABIs will generally include + compatibility shims to ensure correct operation of + binaries compiled against any stable branch where the + platform is Tier 1. These shims might not be enabled in + the default install. If compatibility shims are not + provided for an ABI change, the lack of shims will be + clearly documented in the release notes.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Changes to certain portions of the kernel ABI will + include compatibility shims to ensure correct operation of + kernel modules compiled against the oldest supported + release on the branch. Note that not all parts of the + kernel ABI are protected.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Official binary packages for third party software will + be provided by the ports team. For embedded + architectures, these packages may be cross-built from a + different architecture.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Most relevant ports should either build or have the + appropriate filters to prevent inappropriate ones from + building.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>New features which are not inherently + platform-specific will be fully functional on all Tier 1 + architectures.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Features and compatibility shims used by binaries + compiled against older stable branches may be removed in + newer major versions. Such removals will be clearly + documented in the release notes.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 1 platforms should be fully documented. Basic + operations will be documented in the &os; Handbook.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 1 platforms will be included in the source + tree.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 1 platforms should be self-hosting either via the + in-tree toolchain or an external toolchain. If an + external toolchain is required, official binary packages + for an external toolchain will be provided.</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>To maintain maturity of Tier 1 platforms, the &os; Project + will maintain the following resources to support + development:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Build and test automation support either in the + FreeBSD.org cluster or some other location easily + available for all developers. Embedded platforms may + substitute an emulator available in the FreeBSD.org + cluster for actual hardware.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Inclusion in the <userinput>make universe</userinput> + and <userinput>make tinderbox</userinput> targets.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Dedicated hardware in one of the &os; clusters for + package building (either natively or via + qemu-user).</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>Collectively, developers are required to provide the + following to maintain the Tier 1 status of a platform:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Changes to the source tree should not knowingly break + the build of a Tier 1 platform.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 1 architectures must have a mature, healthy + ecosystem of users and active developers.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Developers should be able to build packages on + commonly available, non-embedded Tier 1 systems. This can + mean either native builds if non-embedded systems are + commonly available for the platform in question, or it can + mean cross-builds hosted on some other Tier 1 + architecture.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Changes cannot break the userland ABI. If an ABI + change is required, ABI compatibility for existing + binaries should be provided via use of symbol versioning + or shared library version bumps.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Changes merged to stable branches cannot break the + protected portions of the kernel ABI. If a kernel ABI + change is required, the change should be modified to + preserve functionality of existing kernel modules.</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + </sect2> + + <sect2> + <title>Tier 2: Developmental and Niche Architectures</title> + + <para>Tier 2 platforms are functional, but less mature &os; + platforms. They are not supported by the security officer, + release engineering, and port management teams.</para> + + <para>Tier 2 platforms may be Tier 1 platform candidates that + are still under active development. Architectures reaching + end of life may also be moved from Tier 1 status to Tier 2 + status as the availability of resources to continue to + maintain the system in a Production Quality state diminishes. + Well-supported niche architectures may also be Tier 2.</para> + + <para>The &os; Project provides the following guarantees to + consumers of Tier 2 platforms:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>The ports infrastructure should include basic support + for Tier 2 architectures sufficient to support building + ports and packages. This includes support for basic + packages such as ports-mgmt/pkg, but there is no guarantee + that arbitrary ports will be buildable or + functional.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>New features which are not inherently + platform-specific should be feasible on all Tier 2 + architectures if not implemented.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 2 platforms will be included in the source + tree.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 2 platforms should be self-hosting either via the + in-tree toolchain or an external toolchain. If an + external toolchain is required, official binary packages + for an external toolchain will be provided.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 2 platforms should provide functional kernels and + userlands even if an official release distribution is not + provided.</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>To maintain maturity of Tier 2 platforms, the &os; Project + will maintain the following resources to support + development:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Inclusion in the <userinput>make universe</userinput> + and <userinput>make tinderbox</userinput> targets.</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + + <para>Collectively, developers are required to provide the + following to maintain the Tier 2 status of a platform:</para> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Changes to the source tree should not knowingly break + the build of a Tier 2 platform.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Tier 2 architectures must have an active ecosystem of + users and developers.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>While changes are permitted to break the userland ABI, + the ABI should not be broken gratuitously. Significant + userland ABI changes should be restricted to major + versions.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>New features that are not yet implemented on Tier 2 + architectures should provide a means of disabling them on + those architectures.</para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> </sect2> <sect2> <title>Tier 3: Experimental Architectures</title> - <para>Tier 3 platforms are not supported by the security officer - and release engineering teams. At the discretion of the - toolchain maintainers, they may be supported in the toolchain. - Tier 3 platforms are architectures in the early stages of - development, for non-mainstream hardware platforms, or which - are considered legacy systems unlikely to see broad future - use. Initial support for Tier 3 platforms is worked on - in external SCM repositories. - The transition to &os;'s subversion takes place after - the platform boots multi-user on hardware; sharing via - subversion is needed for wider exposure; and multiple - developers are actively working on the platform. - Platforms that transition to Tier 3 status may be - removed from the tree if they are no longer actively supported - by the &os; developer community at the discretion of the - release engineer.</para> - - <para>Tier 3 platforms may have ports support, either integrated - or external, but do not require it.</para> - - <para>Tier 3 platforms must have the basics documented for how - to build a kernel and how to boot it on at least one target - hardware or emulation environment. This documentation need - not be integrated into the &os; tree.</para> - - <para>Current Tier 3 platforms are &arch.riscv;.</para> + <para>Tier 3 platforms have at least partial &os; support. They + are <emphasis>not</emphasis> supported by the security + officer, release engineering, and port management + teams.</para> + + <para>Tier 3 platforms are architectures in the early stages of + development, for non-mainstream hardware platforms, or which + are considered legacy systems unlikely to see broad future + use. Initial support for Tier 3 platforms may exist in a + separate repository rather than the main source + repository.</para> + + <para>The &os; Project provides no guarantees to consumers of + Tier 3 platforms and is not committed to maintaining resources + to support development. Tier 3 platforms may not always be + buildable, nor are any kernel or userland ABIs considered + stable.</para> </sect2> <sect2> <title>Tier 4: Unsupported Architectures</title> - <para>Tier 4 systems are not supported in any form by the + <para>Tier 4 platforms are not supported in any form by the project.</para> - <para>All systems not otherwise classified into a support tier - are Tier 4 systems.</para> + <para>All systems not otherwise classified are Tier 4 systems. + When a platform transitions to Tier 4, all support for the + platform is removed from the source and ports trees. Note + that ports support should remain as long as the platform is + supported in a branch supported by ports.</para> </sect2> <sect2> <title>Policy on Changing the Tier of an Architecture</title> <para>Systems may only be moved from one tier to another by - approval of the &os; Core Team, which shall make that - decision in collaboration with the Security Officer, Release - Engineering, and toolchain maintenance teams.</para> + approval of the &os; Core Team, which shall make that decision + in collaboration with the Security Officer, Release + Engineering, and ports management teams. For a platform to be + promoted to a higher tier, any missing support guarantees must + be satisfied before the promotion is completed.</para> </sect2> </sect1> diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml index 4e92d31d39..2b173ec615 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/index.xml @@ -13,96 +13,186 @@ <body class="navinclude.developers"> - <p>If you have comments about a port, or wish to provide feedback to - the developers, send it to the relevant mailing list.</p> - <h2>Supported Platforms</h2> - <p>Here is a list of platforms that FreeBSD currently supports.</p> + <p>Here is a list of platforms supported by FreeBSD.</p> - <table> + <table class="tblbasic"> <thead> <tr> - <td>Platform</td> - <td>Mailing List</td> - <td><a href="https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html">Support Tier</a></td> + <td>Platform Name</td> + <td>TARGET_ARCH</td> + <td>11.x <a href="&base;/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html">Support Tier</a></td> + <td>12.x <a href="&base;/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html">Support Tier</a></td> + <td>Projected 13.x <a href="&base;/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html">Support Tier</a></td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> - <td><a href="amd64.html">amd64 (x86-64)</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org</a></td> + <td>64-bit x86</td> + <td><a href="amd64.html">amd64</a></td> + <td>Tier 1</td> + <td>Tier 1</td> + <td>Tier 1</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit x86</td> + <td><a href="i386.html">i386</a></td> + <td>Tier 1</td> + <td>Tier 1</td> <td>Tier 1</td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="arm.html">ARM64</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org</a></td> + <td>PC98</td> + <td><a href="pc98.html">pc98</a></td> <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4</td> + <td>Tier 4</td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="arm.html">ARM</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org</a></td> + <td>64-bit ARMv8</td> + <td><a href="arm.html">aarch64</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> <td>Tier 2</td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="i386.html">i386 (IA-32)</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org</a></td> - <td>Tier 1</td> + <td>32-bit ARMv4/5</td> + <td><a href="arm.html">arm</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit big-endian ARM</td> + <td><a href="arm.html">armeb</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4</td> + <td>Tier 4</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit ARMv6</td> + <td><a href="arm.html">armv6</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit ARMv7</td> + <td><a href="arm.html">armv7</a></td> + <td><a href="#n-armv7">*1</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit MIPS soft-float</td> + <td><a href="mips.html">mips, mipsel</a></td> + <td>Tier 3</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit MIPS hard-float</td> + <td><a href="mips.html">mipshf, mipselhf</a></td> + <td></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit MIPS n32</td> + <td><a href="mips.html">mipsn32</a></td> + <td>Tier 3</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="mips.html">MIPS</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org</a></td> + <td>64-bit MIPS soft-float</td> + <td><a href="mips.html">mips64, mips64el</a></td> <td>Tier 3</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>64-bit MIPS hard-float</td> + <td><a href="mips.html">mips64hf, mips64elhf</a></td> + <td></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit PowerPC</td> + <td><a href="ppc.html">powerpc</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>32-bit PowerPC with SPE</td> + <td><a href="ppc.html">powerpcspe</a></td> + <td></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>64-bit PowerPC</td> + <td><a href="ppc.html">powerpc64</a></td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="ppc.html">PowerPC (ppc)</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org</a></td> + <td>64-bit RISC-V</td> + <td><a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv">riscv64, + riscv64sf</a></td> + <td></td> + <td>Tier 3</td> <td>Tier 2</td> </tr> <tr> + <td>64-bit SPARCv9</td> <td><a href="sparc.html">sparc64</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org</a></td> <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 2</td> + <td>Tier 4 <a href="#n-gcc4">*2</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> + <h3>Notes</h3> + <ol> + <li><a name="n-armv7"></a>armv7 platforms were supported by + armv6 prior to 12.0.</li> + <li><a name="n-gcc4"></a>These platforms will be transitioned to + Tier 4 for 13.0 unless their default toolchain is changed away + from GCC 4.2.1.</li> + </ol> + <h2>Unsupported Platforms</h2> - <table> + <p>These platforms were supported by older versions of FreeBSD.</p> + + <table class="tblbasic"> <thead> <tr> - <td>Project Page</td> - <td>Mailing List</td> - <td><a href="https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html">Support Tier</a></td> + <td>Platform Name</td> + <td>TARGET_ARCH</td> + <td>Last Supported Release</td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> - <td><a href="alpha.html">FreeBSD/alpha Project</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org</a></td> - <td>Tier 4 (support discontinued as of 7.0R)</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td><a href="ia64/index.html">FreeBSD/ia64 Project</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org</a></td> - <td>Tier 2 through FreeBSD 10. Unsupported after.</td> + <td>Alpha</td> + <td><a href="alpha.html">alpha</a></td> + <td><a href="&base;/releases/index.html#rel6-4">6.4</a></td> </tr> <tr> - <td><a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/riscv">FreeBSD/RISC-V Project</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:freebsd-riscv@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-riscv@FreeBSD.org</a></td> - <td>Tier 3 beginning in FreeBSD 12</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td><a href="pc98.html">FreeBSD/pc98 Project</a></td> - <td><a href="mailto:re-pc98@FreeBSD.org">re-pc98@FreeBSD.org</a></td> - <td>Tier 2 until FreeBSD 11. Unsupported after.</td> + <td>Intel IA-64</td> + <td><a href="ia64/index.html">ia64</a></td> + <td><a href="&base;/releases/index.html#rel10-4">10.4</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> - - <p>For general architecture questions, mail <a href="mailto:freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org">freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org</a></p> </body> </html> diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/index.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/index.xml index c0d0aef081..94bb01adce 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/index.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/releases/index.xml @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ </em> </li> - <li><b>10.4</b> (October, 2017) + <li><a name="rel10-4"></a><b>10.4</b> (October, 2017) <em> <a href="10.4R/announce.html">Announcement</a>: <a href="10.4R/relnotes.html">Release Notes</a>: @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ </em> </li> - <li><b>6.4</b> (November, 2008) + <li><a name="rel6-4"></a><b>6.4</b> (November, 2008) <em> <a href="6.4R/announce.html">Announcement</a>: <a href="6.4R/relnotes.html">Release Notes</a>: |
