aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSergio Carlavilla Delgado <carlavilla@FreeBSD.org>2022-02-28 21:04:52 +0000
committerSergio Carlavilla Delgado <carlavilla@FreeBSD.org>2022-02-28 21:04:52 +0000
commitd0407d9baccd8e9d6bde1fcaf974e6d988141f5a (patch)
treed02c7ba79a5118ceba23125f030f0f2b7222eb3d /documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide
parent92d523725e7e9811ef9e48bf485d370822ebf851 (diff)
Diffstat (limited to 'documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide')
-rw-r--r--documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide/_index.adoc6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide/_index.adoc b/documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide/_index.adoc
index 557630327b..e52393a258 100644
--- a/documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide/_index.adoc
+++ b/documentation/content/en/articles/committers-guide/_index.adoc
@@ -3576,7 +3576,7 @@ Tiers are defined for both kernels and userland ABIs. In the common case, a plat
=== Tier 1: Fully-Supported Architectures
Tier 1 platforms are the most mature FreeBSD platforms.
-They are supported by the security officer, release engineering, and port management teams.
+They are supported by the security officer, release engineering, and Ports Management Team.
Tier 1 architectures are expected to be Production Quality with respect to all aspects of the FreeBSD operating system, including installation and development environments.
The FreeBSD Project provides the following guarantees to consumers of Tier 1 platforms:
@@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ Collectively, developers are required to provide the following to maintain the T
=== Tier 2: Developmental and Niche Architectures
Tier 2 platforms are functional, but less mature FreeBSD platforms.
-They are not supported by the security officer, release engineering, and port management teams.
+They are not supported by the security officer, release engineering, and Ports Management Team.
Tier 2 platforms may be Tier 1 platform candidates that are still under active development.
Architectures reaching end of life may also be moved from Tier 1 status to Tier 2 status as the availability of resources to continue to maintain the system in a Production Quality state diminishes.
@@ -3640,7 +3640,7 @@ Collectively, developers are required to provide the following to maintain the T
=== Tier 3: Experimental Architectures
Tier 3 platforms have at least partial FreeBSD support.
-They are _not_ supported by the security officer, release engineering, and port management teams.
+They are _not_ supported by the security officer, release engineering, and Ports Management Team.
Tier 3 platforms are architectures in the early stages of development, for non-mainstream hardware platforms, or which are considered legacy systems unlikely to see broad future use.
Initial support for Tier 3 platforms may exist in a separate repository rather than the main source repository.