diff options
| author | Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-06-02 17:58:47 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ed Schouten <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-06-02 17:58:47 +0000 |
| commit | ec2b103c267a06a66e926f62cd96767b280f5cf5 (patch) | |
| tree | ce7d964cbb5e39695b71481698f10cb099c23d4a /test/Analysis/casts.m | |
Notes
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Analysis/casts.m')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/Analysis/casts.m | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/casts.m b/test/Analysis/casts.m new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..82c29fac904f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Analysis/casts.m @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +// RUN: clang-cc -analyze -checker-cfref -analyzer-store=basic --verify %s && +// RUN: clang-cc -analyze -checker-cfref -analyzer-store=region --verify %s + +// Test function pointer casts. Currently we track function addresses using +// loc::FunctionVal. Because casts can be arbitrary, do we need to model +// functions with regions? +typedef void* (*MyFuncTest1)(void); + +MyFuncTest1 test1_aux(void); +void test1(void) { + void *x; + void* (*p)(void); + p = ((void*) test1_aux()); + if (p != ((void*) 0)) x = (*p)(); +} + +// Test casts from void* to function pointers. Same issue as above: +// should we eventually model function pointers using regions? +void* test2(void *p) { + MyFuncTest1 fp = (MyFuncTest1) p; + return (*fp)(); +} |
