aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp')
-rw-r--r--contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp80
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp
index ebe3bfc4b75a..88a28a3be53e 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp
@@ -538,8 +538,8 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) {
return RecursivelyLegalizeResults(Op, ResultVals);
}
-// FIXME: This is very similar to the X86 override of
-// TargetLowering::LowerOperationWrapper. Can we merge them somehow?
+// FIXME: This is very similar to TargetLowering::LowerOperationWrapper. Can we
+// merge them somehow?
bool VectorLegalizer::LowerOperationWrapper(SDNode *Node,
SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Results) {
SDValue Res = TLI.LowerOperation(SDValue(Node, 0), DAG);
@@ -774,8 +774,8 @@ void VectorLegalizer::Expand(SDNode *Node, SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Results) {
ExpandSETCC(Node, Results);
return;
case ISD::ABS:
- if (TLI.expandABS(Node, Tmp, DAG)) {
- Results.push_back(Tmp);
+ if (SDValue Expanded = TLI.expandABS(Node, DAG)) {
+ Results.push_back(Expanded);
return;
}
break;
@@ -783,22 +783,22 @@ void VectorLegalizer::Expand(SDNode *Node, SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Results) {
ExpandBITREVERSE(Node, Results);
return;
case ISD::CTPOP:
- if (TLI.expandCTPOP(Node, Tmp, DAG)) {
- Results.push_back(Tmp);
+ if (SDValue Expanded = TLI.expandCTPOP(Node, DAG)) {
+ Results.push_back(Expanded);
return;
}
break;
case ISD::CTLZ:
case ISD::CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF:
- if (TLI.expandCTLZ(Node, Tmp, DAG)) {
- Results.push_back(Tmp);
+ if (SDValue Expanded = TLI.expandCTLZ(Node, DAG)) {
+ Results.push_back(Expanded);
return;
}
break;
case ISD::CTTZ:
case ISD::CTTZ_ZERO_UNDEF:
- if (TLI.expandCTTZ(Node, Tmp, DAG)) {
- Results.push_back(Tmp);
+ if (SDValue Expanded = TLI.expandCTTZ(Node, DAG)) {
+ Results.push_back(Expanded);
return;
}
break;
@@ -943,10 +943,8 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::ExpandSELECT(SDNode *Node) {
// What is the size of each element in the vector mask.
EVT BitTy = MaskTy.getScalarType();
- Mask = DAG.getSelect(DL, BitTy, Mask,
- DAG.getConstant(APInt::getAllOnesValue(BitTy.getSizeInBits()), DL,
- BitTy),
- DAG.getConstant(0, DL, BitTy));
+ Mask = DAG.getSelect(DL, BitTy, Mask, DAG.getAllOnesConstant(DL, BitTy),
+ DAG.getConstant(0, DL, BitTy));
// Broadcast the mask so that the entire vector is all one or all zero.
if (VT.isFixedLengthVector())
@@ -960,9 +958,7 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::ExpandSELECT(SDNode *Node) {
Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MaskTy, Op1);
Op2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MaskTy, Op2);
- SDValue AllOnes = DAG.getConstant(
- APInt::getAllOnesValue(BitTy.getSizeInBits()), DL, MaskTy);
- SDValue NotMask = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, DL, MaskTy, Mask, AllOnes);
+ SDValue NotMask = DAG.getNOT(DL, Mask, MaskTy);
Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, MaskTy, Op1, Mask);
Op2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, MaskTy, Op2, NotMask);
@@ -1099,25 +1095,45 @@ static void createBSWAPShuffleMask(EVT VT, SmallVectorImpl<int> &ShuffleMask) {
SDValue VectorLegalizer::ExpandBSWAP(SDNode *Node) {
EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
+ // Scalable vectors can't use shuffle expansion.
+ if (VT.isScalableVector())
+ return TLI.expandBSWAP(Node, DAG);
+
// Generate a byte wise shuffle mask for the BSWAP.
SmallVector<int, 16> ShuffleMask;
createBSWAPShuffleMask(VT, ShuffleMask);
EVT ByteVT = EVT::getVectorVT(*DAG.getContext(), MVT::i8, ShuffleMask.size());
// Only emit a shuffle if the mask is legal.
- if (!TLI.isShuffleMaskLegal(ShuffleMask, ByteVT))
- return DAG.UnrollVectorOp(Node);
+ if (TLI.isShuffleMaskLegal(ShuffleMask, ByteVT)) {
+ SDLoc DL(Node);
+ SDValue Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, ByteVT, Node->getOperand(0));
+ Op = DAG.getVectorShuffle(ByteVT, DL, Op, DAG.getUNDEF(ByteVT), ShuffleMask);
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Op);
+ }
- SDLoc DL(Node);
- SDValue Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, ByteVT, Node->getOperand(0));
- Op = DAG.getVectorShuffle(ByteVT, DL, Op, DAG.getUNDEF(ByteVT), ShuffleMask);
- return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Op);
+ // If we have the appropriate vector bit operations, it is better to use them
+ // than unrolling and expanding each component.
+ if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SHL, VT) &&
+ TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SRL, VT) &&
+ TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(ISD::AND, VT) &&
+ TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(ISD::OR, VT))
+ return TLI.expandBSWAP(Node, DAG);
+
+ // Otherwise unroll.
+ return DAG.UnrollVectorOp(Node);
}
void VectorLegalizer::ExpandBITREVERSE(SDNode *Node,
SmallVectorImpl<SDValue> &Results) {
EVT VT = Node->getValueType(0);
+ // We can't unroll or use shuffles for scalable vectors.
+ if (VT.isScalableVector()) {
+ Results.push_back(TLI.expandBITREVERSE(Node, DAG));
+ return;
+ }
+
// If we have the scalar operation, it's probably cheaper to unroll it.
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::BITREVERSE, VT.getScalarType())) {
SDValue Tmp = DAG.UnrollVectorOp(Node);
@@ -1156,9 +1172,10 @@ void VectorLegalizer::ExpandBITREVERSE(SDNode *Node,
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SHL, VT) &&
TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::SRL, VT) &&
TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(ISD::AND, VT) &&
- TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(ISD::OR, VT))
- // Let LegalizeDAG handle this later.
+ TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(ISD::OR, VT)) {
+ Results.push_back(TLI.expandBITREVERSE(Node, DAG));
return;
+ }
// Otherwise unroll.
SDValue Tmp = DAG.UnrollVectorOp(Node);
@@ -1207,9 +1224,7 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::ExpandVSELECT(SDNode *Node) {
Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Op1);
Op2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Op2);
- SDValue AllOnes = DAG.getConstant(
- APInt::getAllOnesValue(VT.getScalarSizeInBits()), DL, VT);
- SDValue NotMask = DAG.getNode(ISD::XOR, DL, VT, Mask, AllOnes);
+ SDValue NotMask = DAG.getNOT(DL, Mask, VT);
Op1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, VT, Op1, Mask);
Op2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, DL, VT, Op2, NotMask);
@@ -1502,9 +1517,8 @@ void VectorLegalizer::UnrollStrictFPOp(SDNode *Node,
if (Node->getOpcode() == ISD::STRICT_FSETCC ||
Node->getOpcode() == ISD::STRICT_FSETCCS)
ScalarResult = DAG.getSelect(dl, EltVT, ScalarResult,
- DAG.getConstant(APInt::getAllOnesValue
- (EltVT.getSizeInBits()), dl, EltVT),
- DAG.getConstant(0, dl, EltVT));
+ DAG.getAllOnesConstant(dl, EltVT),
+ DAG.getConstant(0, dl, EltVT));
OpValues.push_back(ScalarResult);
OpChains.push_back(ScalarChain);
@@ -1536,9 +1550,7 @@ SDValue VectorLegalizer::UnrollVSETCC(SDNode *Node) {
TLI.getSetCCResultType(DAG.getDataLayout(),
*DAG.getContext(), TmpEltVT),
LHSElem, RHSElem, CC);
- Ops[i] = DAG.getSelect(dl, EltVT, Ops[i],
- DAG.getConstant(APInt::getAllOnesValue
- (EltVT.getSizeInBits()), dl, EltVT),
+ Ops[i] = DAG.getSelect(dl, EltVT, Ops[i], DAG.getAllOnesConstant(dl, EltVT),
DAG.getConstant(0, dl, EltVT));
}
return DAG.getBuildVector(VT, dl, Ops);