1 files changed, 0 insertions, 92 deletions
diff --git a/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.sh.cpp b/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.sh.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index d7b4cca63aa1..000000000000
--- a/test/libcxx/language.support/support.dynamic/new_faligned_allocation.sh.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
-// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-// test libc++'s implementation of align_val_t, and the relevant new/delete
-// overloads in all dialects when -faligned-allocation is present.
-
-// Libc++ defers to the underlying MSVC library to provide the new/delete
-// definitions, which does not yet provide aligned allocation
-// XFAIL: LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME
-
-// REQUIRES: -faligned-allocation
-
-// The dylibs shipped before macosx10.14 do not contain the aligned allocation
-// functions, so trying to force using those with -faligned-allocation results
-// in a link error.
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.13
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.12
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.11
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.10
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.9
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.8
-// XFAIL: with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.7
-
-// RUN: %build -faligned-allocation
-// RUN: %run
-
-#include <new>
-#include <typeinfo>
-#include <string>
-#include <cassert>
-
-#include "test_macros.h"
-
-int main() {
-  {
-    static_assert(std::is_enum<std::align_val_t>::value, "");
-    typedef std::underlying_type<std::align_val_t>::type UT;
-    static_assert((std::is_same<UT, std::size_t>::value), "");
-  }
-  {
-    static_assert((!std::is_constructible<std::align_val_t, std::size_t>::value), "");
-#if TEST_STD_VER >= 11
-    static_assert(!std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value, "");
-#else
-    static_assert((std::is_constructible<std::size_t, std::align_val_t>::value), "");
-#endif
-  }
-  {
-    std::align_val_t a = std::align_val_t(0);
-    std::align_val_t b = std::align_val_t(32);
-    assert(a != b);
-    assert(a == std::align_val_t(0));
-    assert(b == std::align_val_t(32));
-  }
-  {
-    void *ptr = ::operator new(1, std::align_val_t(128));
-    assert(ptr);
-    assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % 128 == 0);
-    ::operator delete(ptr, std::align_val_t(128));
-  }
-  {
-    void *ptr = ::operator new(1, std::align_val_t(128), std::nothrow);
-    assert(ptr);
-    assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % 128 == 0);
-    ::operator delete(ptr, std::align_val_t(128), std::nothrow);
-  }
-  {
-    void *ptr = ::operator new[](1, std::align_val_t(128));
-    assert(ptr);
-    assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % 128 == 0);
-    ::operator delete[](ptr, std::align_val_t(128));
-  }
-  {
-    void *ptr = ::operator new[](1, std::align_val_t(128), std::nothrow);
-    assert(ptr);
-    assert(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(ptr) % 128 == 0);
-    ::operator delete[](ptr, std::align_val_t(128), std::nothrow);
-  }
-#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_RTTI
-  {
-    // Check that libc++ doesn't define align_val_t in a versioning namespace.
-    // And that it mangles the same in C++03 through C++17
-    assert(typeid(std::align_val_t).name() == std::string("St11align_val_t"));
-  }
-#endif
-}