diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'unit-tests/varmod-loop-varname.mk')
| -rw-r--r-- | unit-tests/varmod-loop-varname.mk | 127 |
1 files changed, 127 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/unit-tests/varmod-loop-varname.mk b/unit-tests/varmod-loop-varname.mk new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d51e2ba76a42 --- /dev/null +++ b/unit-tests/varmod-loop-varname.mk @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +# $NetBSD: varmod-loop-varname.mk,v 1.2 2021/04/04 13:35:26 rillig Exp $ +# +# Tests for the first part of the variable modifier ':@var@...@', which +# contains the variable name to use during the loop. + +.MAKE.SAVE_DOLLARS= yes + + +# Before 2021-04-04, the name of the loop variable could be generated +# dynamically. There was no practical use-case for this. +# Since var.c 1.907 from 2021-04-04, a '$' is no longer allowed in the +# variable name. +.if ${:Uone two three:@${:Ubar:S,b,v,}@+${var}+@} != "+one+ +two+ +three+" +. error +.endif + + +# ":::" is a very creative variable name, unlikely to occur in practice. +# The expression ${\:\:\:} would not work since backslashes can only +# be escaped in the modifiers, but not in the variable name, therefore +# the extra indirection via the modifier ':U'. +.if ${:U1 2 3:@:::@x${${:U\:\:\:}}y@} != "x1y x2y x3y" +. error +.endif + + +# "@@" is another creative variable name. +.if ${:U1 2 3:@\@\@@x${@@}y@} != "x1y x2y x3y" +. error +.endif + + +# In extreme cases, even the backslash can be used as variable name. +# It needs to be doubled though. +.if ${:U1 2 3:@\\@x${${:Ux:S,x,\\,}}y@} != "x1y x2y x3y" +. error +.endif + + +# The variable name can technically be empty, and in this situation +# the variable value cannot be accessed since the empty "variable" +# is protected to always return an empty string. +.if ${:U1 2 3:@@x${}y@} != "xy xy xy" +. error +.endif + + +# The :@ modifier resolves the variables from the replacement text once more +# than expected. In particular, it resolves _all_ variables from the scope, +# and not only the loop variable (in this case v). +SRCS= source +CFLAGS.source= before +ALL_CFLAGS:= ${SRCS:@src@${CFLAGS.${src}}@} # note the ':=' +CFLAGS.source+= after +.if ${ALL_CFLAGS} != "before" +. error +.endif + + +# In the following example, the modifier ':@' expands the '$$' to '$'. This +# means that when the resulting expression is evaluated, these resulting '$' +# will be interpreted as starting a subexpression. +# +# The d means direct reference, the i means indirect reference. +RESOLVE= ${RES1} $${RES1} +RES1= 1d${RES2} 1i$${RES2} +RES2= 2d${RES3} 2i$${RES3} +RES3= 3 + +.if ${RESOLVE:@v@w${v}w@} != "w1d2d3w w2i3w w1i2d3 2i\${RES3}w w1d2d3 2i\${RES3} 1i\${RES2}w" +. error +.endif + + +# Until 2020-07-20, the variable name of the :@ modifier could end with one +# or two dollar signs, which were silently ignored. +# There's no point in allowing a dollar sign in that position. +# Since var.c 1.907 from 2021-04-04, a '$' is no longer allowed in the +# variable name. +.if ${1 2 3:L:@v$@($v)@} != "(1) (2) (3)" +. error +.else +. error +.endif +.if ${1 2 3:L:@v$$@($v)@} != "() () ()" +. error +.else +. error +.endif +.if ${1 2 3:L:@v$$$@($v)@} != "() () ()" +. error +.else +. error +.endif + + +# It may happen that there are nested :@ modifiers that use the same name for +# for the loop variable. These modifiers influence each other. +# +# As of 2020-10-18, the :@ modifier is implemented by actually setting a +# variable in the scope of the expression and deleting it again after the +# loop. This is different from the .for loops, which substitute the variable +# expression with ${:Uvalue}, leading to different unwanted side effects. +# +# To make the behavior more predictable, the :@ modifier should restore the +# loop variable to the value it had before the loop. This would result in +# the string "1a b c1 2a b c2 3a b c3", making the two loops independent. +.if ${:U1 2 3:@i@$i${:Ua b c:@i@$i@}${i:Uu}@} != "1a b cu 2a b cu 3a b cu" +. error +.endif + +# During the loop, the variable is actually defined and nonempty. +# If the loop were implemented in the same way as the .for loop, the variable +# would be neither defined nor nonempty since all expressions of the form +# ${var} would have been replaced with ${:Uword} before evaluating them. +.if defined(var) +. error +.endif +.if ${:Uword:@var@${defined(var):?def:undef} ${empty(var):?empty:nonempty}@} \ + != "def nonempty" +. error +.endif +.if defined(var) +. error +.endif + +all: .PHONY |
