| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This uses the new layout of the upstream repository, which was recently
migrated to GitHub, and converted into a "monorepo". That is, most of
the earlier separate sub-projects with their own branches and tags were
consolidated into one top-level directory, and are now branched and
tagged together.
Updating the vendor area to match this layout is next.
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=355940
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[mips] Set macros for Octeon+ CPU
This is one of the upstream changes needed for adding support for the
OCTEON+ CPU type, so that we can test Clang builds using the most
commonly available FreeBSD/mips64 reference platform, the Edge Router
Lite.
Requested by: kevans
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354985
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[mips] Set __OCTEON__ macros
This is one of the upstream changes needed for adding support for the
OCTEON+ CPU type, so that we can test Clang builds using the most
commonly available FreeBSD/mips64 reference platform, the Edge Router
Lite.
Requested by: kevans
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[mips] Fix `__mips_isa_rev` macros value for Octeon CPU
This is one of the upstream changes needed for adding support for the
OCTEON+ CPU type, so that we can test Clang builds using the most
commonly available FreeBSD/mips64 reference platform, the Edge Router
Lite.
Requested by: kevans
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354983
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[mips] Add `octeon+` to the list of CPUs accepted by the driver
This is one of the upstream changes needed for adding support for the
OCTEON+ CPU type, so that we can test Clang builds using the most
commonly available FreeBSD/mips64 reference platform, the Edge Router
Lite.
Requested by: kevans
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354982
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[RISCV] Add Custom Parser for Atomic Memory Operands
Summary:
GCC Accepts both (reg) and 0(reg) for atomic instruction memory
operands. These instructions do not allow for an offset in their
encoding, so in the latter case, the 0 is silently dropped.
Due to how we have structured the RISCVAsmParser, the easiest way to
add support for parsing this offset is to add a custom AsmOperand and
parser. This parser drops all the parens, and just keeps the
register.
This commit also adds a custom printer for these operands, which
matches the GCC canonical printer, printing both `(a0)` and `0(a0)`
as `(a0)`.
Reviewers: asb, lewis-revill
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: s.egerton, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook,
apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay,
zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o,
rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65205
llvm-svn: 367553
Merge commit f596f4507 from llvm git (by Sam Elliott):
[RISCV] Add FreeBSD targets
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: simoncook, s.egerton, lenary, psnobl, benna, mhorne,
emaste, kito-cheng, shiva0217, rogfer01, rkruppe, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57795
Patch by James Clarke (jrtc27)
llvm-svn: 367557
Merge commit f596f4507 from llvm git (by Hsiangkai Wang):
[DebugInfo] Generate fixups as emitting DWARF .debug_frame/.eh_frame.
It is necessary to generate fixups in .debug_frame or .eh_frame as
relaxation is enabled due to the address delta may be changed after
relaxation.
There is an opcode with 6-bits data in debug frame encoding. So, we
also need 6-bits fixup types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58335
llvm-svn: 366524
Merge commit f596f4507 from llvm git (by Hsiangkai Wang):
[DebugInfo] Some fields do not need relocations even relax is enabled.
In debug frame information, some fields, e.g., Length in CIE/FDE and
Offset in FDE are attributes to describe the structure of CIE/FDE.
They are not related to the relaxed code. However, these attributes
are symbol differences. So, in current design, these attributes will
be filled as zero and LLVM generates relocations for them.
We only need to generate relocations for symbols in executable
sections. So, if the symbols are not located in executable sections,
we still evaluate their values under relaxation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61584
llvm-svn: 366531
Merge commit f596f4507 from llvm git (by Alex Bradbury):
[RISCV] Don't force absolute FK_Data_X fixups to relocs
The current behavior of shouldForceRelocation forces relocations for
the majority of fixups when relaxation is enabled. This makes sense
for fixups which incorporate symbols but is unnecessary for simple
data fixups where the fixup target is already resolved to an absolute
value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63404
Patch by Edward Jones.
llvm-svn: 369257
Merge commit f596f4507 from llvm git (by Alex Bradbury):
[RISCV] Implement getExprForFDESymbol to ensure RISCV_32_PCREL is
used for the FDE location
Follow binutils in using RISCV_32_PCREL for the FDE initial location.
As explained in the relevant binutils commit
<https://github.com/riscv/riscv-binutils-gdb/commit/a6cbf936e3dce68114d28cdf60d510a3f78a6d40>,
the ADD/SUB pair of relocations is problematic in the presence of
linker relaxation.
This patch has the same end goal as D64715 but includes test changes
and avoids adding a new global VariantKind to MCExpr.h (preferring
RISCVMCExpr VKs like the rest of the RISC-V backend).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66419
llvm-svn: 369375
This series of merges will permit riscv64 kernels and riscv64sf worlds
to build with clang instead of gcc (but still using the bfd linker).
Requested by: jhb
Obtained from: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...bsdjhb:riscv_clang
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354469
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[ARM] VFPv2 only supports 16 D registers.
r361845 changed the way we handle "D16" vs. "D32" targets; there used
to be a negative "d16" which removed instructions from the
instruction set, and now there's a "d32" feature which adds
instructions to the instruction set. This is good, but there was an
oversight in the implementation: the behavior of VFPv2 was changed.
In particular, the "vfp2" feature was changed to imply "d32". This is
wrong: VFPv2 only supports 16 D registers.
In practice, this means if you specify -mfpu=vfpv2, the compiler will
generate illegal instructions.
This patch gets rid of "vfp2d16" and "vfp2d16sp", and fixes "vfp2"
and "vfp2sp" so they don't imply "d32".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375
Pull in r372187 from upstream clang trunk (by Eli Friedman):
[ARM] Update clang for removal of vfp2d16 and vfp2d16sp
Matching fix for https://reviews.llvm.org/D67375 (r372186).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67467
This should fix clang generating invalid opcodes for floating point
operations on armv6.
Requested by: mmel
MFC after: 3 days
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=354097
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add -m(no)-spe to clang
Summary:
r337347 added support for the Signal Processing Engine (SPE) to LLVM.
This follows that up with the clang side.
This adds -mspe and -mno-spe, to match GCC.
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49754
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=352539
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
release 9.0.0 r372316, and update version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=352536
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
release_90 branch r370514, and update version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=351722
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
release_90 branch r369369, and update version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=351708
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang900-import/; revision=351350
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
8.0.1 final release r366581. The only functional change is a fix for a
mismerge of upstream r360816, which properly restores the r2 register
when unwinding on PowerPC64 (See https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20337).
Relnotes: yes
PR: 236062
MFC after: 3 days
X-MFC-With: r349004
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=350177
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=349004
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
8.0.0 final release r356365. There were no functional changes since the
most recent merge, of 8.0.0 rc5.
Release notes for llvm, clang, lld and libc++ 8.0.0 are now available:
https://llvm.org/releases/8.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
https://llvm.org/releases/8.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
https://llvm.org/releases/8.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
https://llvm.org/releases/8.0.0/projects/libcxx/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
PR: 236062
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r344779
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=345345
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r354130, resolve conflicts, and bump version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang800-import/; revision=344177
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r353167, resolve conflicts, and bump version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang800-import/; revision=343806
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang800-import/; revision=343314
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang800-import/; revision=343214
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
7.0.1 release r349250. There were no functional changes since the 7.0.1
rc3 import.
PR: 230240, 230355
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 months
X-MFC-With: r341825
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=342123
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r346007 (effectively 7.0.1 rc2), resolve conflicts, and bump version
numbers.
PR: 230240, 230355
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=340125
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r342383, and bump version numbers.
PR: 230240, 230355
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=338730
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adjust MaxAtomicInlineWidth for i386/i486 targets.
This is to fix the bug reported in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34347#c6. Currently, all
MaxAtomicInlineWidth of x86-32 targets are set to 64. However, i386
doesn't support any cmpxchg related instructions. i486 only supports
cmpxchg. So in this patch MaxAtomicInlineWidth is reset as follows:
For i386, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 0 because no cmpxchg is
supported. For i486, the MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 32 because
it supports cmpxchg. For others 32 bits x86 cpu, the
MaxAtomicInlineWidth should be 64 because of cmpxchg8b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42154
This should fix buildworld on i386, because of our system libraries
missing __atomic_load_8, and possibly other 64 bit atomic functions, for
that architecture.
We should really fix that at some point, but since we have been actually
using cmpxchg8b for years now, it does not seem to matter much...
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=337979
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=337310
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
resolve conflicts.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=337150
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang700-import/; revision=336979
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6.0.1 release (upstream r335540).
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 weeks
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=335799
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EFLAGS copy that lives out of a basic block!" errors on i386.
Pull in r325446 from upstream clang trunk (by me):
[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.
Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.
These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.
Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
Pull in r330264 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Fix PR37100 by teaching the EFLAGS copy lowering to rewrite
uses across basic blocks in the limited cases where it is very
straight forward to do so.
This will also be useful for other places where we do some limited
EFLAGS propagation across CFG edges and need to handle copy rewrites
afterward. I think this is rapidly approaching the maximum we can and
should be doing here. Everything else begins to require either heroic
analysis to prove how to do PHI insertion manually, or somehow
managing arbitrary PHI-ing of EFLAGS with general PHI insertion.
Neither of these seem at all promising so if those cases come up,
we'll almost certainly need to rewrite the parts of LLVM that produce
those patterns.
We do now require dominator trees in order to reliably diagnose
patterns that would require PHI nodes. This is a bit unfortunate but
it seems better than the completely mysterious crash we would get
otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45673
Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.
Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=332833
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported upstream as <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37133>.
Reported by: emaste, ci.freebsd.org
PR: 225330
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=332503
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[X86] Add 'sahf' CPU feature to frontend
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is
to teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather,
it was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature
(see lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
Pull in r328944 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Expose more of the condition conversion routines in the public
API for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch
under review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely
orthogonal and obvious, so landing it. NFC.
Pull in r329414 from upstream llvm trunk (by Craig Topper):
[X86] Merge itineraries for CLC, CMC, and STC.
These are very simple flag setting instructions that appear to only
be a single uop. They're unlikely to need this separation.
Pull in r329657 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Introduce a pass to begin more systematically fixing PR36028
and similar issues.
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the
necessary state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses
are cmovCC and jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily
save and restore the necessary information by simply inserting a
setCC into a GPR where the original flags are live, and then testing
that GPR directly to feed the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the
flags. This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to
come up in practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without
taking advantage of partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't
currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe
EFLAGS currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are
using DF. Currently, they will not be handled by this approach.
However, I have never seen this issue come up in practice. It is
already pretty rare to have these patterns come up in practical code
with LLVM. I had to resort to writing MIR tests to cover most of the
logic in this pass already. I suspect even with its current amount
of coverage of arithmetic users of EFLAGS it will be a significant
improvement over the current use of pushf/popf. It will also produce
substantially faster code in most of the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies,
and the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies
were found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack
adjustment wasn't a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower
all of these copies directly in MI and without require stack
adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things
tripping me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
Pull in r329673 from upstream llvm trunk (by Chandler Carruth):
[x86] Model the direction flag (DF) separately from the rest of
EFLAGS.
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting
EFLAGS actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this
needlessly creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD,
CLD, and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model
this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the
correct datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as
necessary here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
Together, these should ensure clang does not use pushf/popf sequences to
save and restore flags, avoiding problems with unrelated flags (such as
the interrupt flag) being restored unexpectedly.
Requested by: jtl
PR: 225330
MFC after: 1 week
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=332501
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6.0.0 release (upstream r326565).
Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here soon:
<http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 3 months
X-MFC-With: r327952
PR: 224669
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=330384
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6.0.0 (branches/release_60 r325932). This corresponds to 6.0.0 rc3.
MFC after: 3 months
X-MFC-With: r327952
PR: 224669
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=329983
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6.0.0 (branches/release_60 r324090).
This introduces retpoline support, with the -mretpoline flag. The
upstream initial commit message (r323155 by Chandler Carruth) contains
quite a bit of explanation. Quoting:
Introduce the "retpoline" x86 mitigation technique for variant #2 of
the speculative execution vulnerabilities disclosed today,
specifically identified by CVE-2017-5715, "Branch Target Injection",
and is one of the two halves to Spectre.
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that
this is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero
blog post for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative
execution of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by
poisoning the prediction of indirect branches with the address of
that gadget. The gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a
side channel for reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a
load of secret data followed by a branch on the loaded value and then
a load of some predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing
of the processors cache to determine which direction the branch took
*in the speculative execution*, and in turn what one bit of the
loaded value was. Due to the nature of these timing side channels and
the branch predictor on Intel processors, this allows an attacker to
leak data only accessible to a privileged domain (like the kernel)
back into an unprivileged domain.
The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In
many cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches
and a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering
switches in this way and the first step of this patch is to disable
jump-table lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite
explicit indirectbr sequences into a switch over integers.
However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as a
trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures
the processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known
location. The retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto
the stack by the call with the desired target of the original
indirect call. The result is a predicted return to the next
instruction after a call (which can be used to trap speculative
execution within an infinite loop) and an actual indirect branch to
an arbitrary address.
On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this
device. For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register
and so several different retpoline variants are introduced to use a
scratch register if one is available in the calling convention and to
otherwise use direct stack push/pop sequences to pass the target
address.
This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
We also support a target feature that disables emission of the
retpoline thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users
want them. These are particularly useful in environments like
kernels that routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch
their thunk to different code sequences. They can write this custom
thunk and use `-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to
`-mretpoline`. In this case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_eax
__llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
__llvm_external_retpoline_edx
__llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.
There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.
The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are
from precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we
have found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on
them here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.
For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z
retpolineplt` (or use similar functionality from some other linker).
We strongly recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows
the retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.
When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typic al workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately
2%) even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely
due to the small number of indirect branches that occur in
performance sensitive paths of the kernel.
When using these patches on statically linked applications,
especially C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more
dramatic performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch,
indirect-, or virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from
10% to 50%.
However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically
reduce the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting
them to direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to
lower switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++
applications, we *strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call
targets are statically linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both
PGO and ThinLTO. Well tuned servers using all of these techniques saw
5% - 10% overhead from the use of retpoline.
We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality
available as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd
really like to get these patches landed and backported ASAP for
obvious reasons. We're planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0
release streams and get a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked
ASAP for distros and vendors.
This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month:
Eric, Reid, Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit
due to the time sensitive nature of landing this and the need to
backport it. Huge thanks to everyone who helped out here, and
everyone at Intel who helped out in discussions about how to craft
this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at Google, but not an LLVM
contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline design.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723
MFC after: 3 months
X-MFC-With: r327952
PR: 224669
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=328817
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[X86] Make -mavx512f imply -mfma and -mf16c in the frontend like it
does in the backend.
Similarly, make -mno-fma and -mno-f16c imply -mno-avx512f.
Withou this "-mno-sse -mavx512f" ends up with avx512f being enabled
in the frontend but disabled in the backend.
Reported by: pawel
PR: 225488
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=328513
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
update build glue and version numbers.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang600-import/; revision=327657
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
update build glue and version numbers, add new intrinsics headers, and
update OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang600-import/; revision=327330
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang600-import/; revision=327135
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang600-import/; revision=327024
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5.0.1 release (upstream r320880).
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 2 weeks
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=326909
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
upstream release_50 branch. This corresponds to 5.0.1 rc2.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=326496
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5.0.0 release (upstream r312559).
Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here soon:
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
Relnotes: yes
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-with: r321369
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=323245
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
upstream release_50 branch.
MFC after: 2 months
X-MFC-with: r321369
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=322740
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
upstream release_50 branch.
MFC after: 2 months
X-MFC-with: r321369
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=322320
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
upstream release_50 branch. This is just after upstream's 5.0.0-rc1.
MFC after: 2 months
X-MFC-with: r321369
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=321723
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=321238
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=320970
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=320572
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=320397
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=319799
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build glue.
Notes:
svn path=/projects/clang500-import/; revision=319547
|