| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implement the Linux inotify system calls using the native implementation
in vfs_inotify.c.
PR: 240874
Reviewed by: brooks
MFC after: 3 months
Sponsored by: Klara, Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50761
|
|
|
|
| |
MFC after: 1 week
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove /^[\s*]*__FBSDID\("\$FreeBSD\$"\);?\s*\n/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On Linux these system calls have an effect only when used in conjuction
with an I/O scheduler that supports I/O priorities. If no I/O scheduler
has been set for a thread, then by defaut the I/O priority will follow
the CPU nice value. Due to FreeBSD lack of I/O scheduler facilities, the
default Linux behavior is implemented.
Ubuntu 23.04 debootstrap requires Linux ionice which depends on these
syscalls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41153
MFC after: 1 month
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed by:
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35544
MFC after: 1 month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SPDX folks have obsoleted the BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD identifier. Catch
up to that fact and revert to their recommended match of BSD-2-Clause.
Discussed with: pfg
MFC After: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handling of the CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE flag is not implemented due to
difference in fd unsharing mechanism in the Linux and FreeBSD.
Reviewed by: mjg
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39398
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cleanup unneeded includes, sort the rest according to style(9).
No functional changes.
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
| |
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid annoyng messages from glibc-2.35 test suite add the simple
implementation of rseq syscall which is do nothing for now.
I plan to implement it if and when the API stabilizes.
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't emit messages; this isn't any different from a Linux kernel
built without OPTIONS_SECCOMP, so the userspace already needs to know
how to deal with it. This is also similar with how we handle seccomp
in linux_prctl().
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33808
|
|
|
|
| |
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add email and fixup years while here.
Reviewed by: imp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30912
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 252106
Reviewed By: dchagin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No functional changes.
Reviewed By: emaste
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30524
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sponsored By: EPSRC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are similar to our getfhat(2) and fhopen(2) syscalls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27111
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=367773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move dtrace SDT definitions into linux_common module code. Also, build
linux_dummy.c into the linux_common kld -- we don't need separate
versions of these stubs for 32- and 64-bit emulation.
Reported by: several
PR: 250897
Discussed with: emaste, trasz
Tested by: John Kennedy, Yasuhiro KIMURA, Oleg Sidorkin
X-MFC-With: r367395
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27124
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=367433
|
|
No functional change.
Reviewed by: emaste, trasz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27099
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=367395
|